1 / 13

Social Influence 1: Conformity

Social Influence 1: Conformity. 21 January 2004. Why Conform?. Our sanity depends to some degree on the belief that everyone sees the same world that we see

brick
Télécharger la présentation

Social Influence 1: Conformity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Influence 1:Conformity 21 January 2004

  2. Why Conform? • Our sanity depends to some degree on the belief that everyone sees the same world that we see • If this belief is challenged, we’d rather change what we see (or what we say we see) than admit to ourselves (or others) that we see a different world

  3. Conformity • Conformity • Acting at odds with your beliefs or perceptions because of pressure from others • Compliance vs internalization • Normative vs. Informational pressure/influence • Cialdini littering experiment • Drisball & Muller jaywalking experiment

  4. Jaywalking (Drisball & Muller) 45 40 35 30 % jaywalking 25 20 15 10 5 JW No JW BL

  5. Solomon Asch: Compliance in an Unambiguous Situation

  6. Asch Line Judgment Experiments Stimulus A B C

  7. You cannot be serious!

  8. Asch • Results: • 33% went along with the group on a majority of the trials • 25% remained completely independent • 75% conformed at least once • When tested alone (no confederates), subjects got more than 98% of the judgments correct • When tested with confederates, they only got 66% of the judgments correct

  9. Why conform? • Confusion • Informational pressure • Embarrassment • Normative pressure • 2 more versions of the experiment • Compliance, NOT internalization

  10. Ambiguous situation Autokinetic effect Informational pressure: 1 year follow-up Internalization, NOT compliance Version B of the experiment and what that tells us Sherif (1936)

  11. How to reduce conformity? • Preferences vs Facts • Crutchfield (1955) • Asch-type paradigm but with drawings • No conformity • Why? • Lone Dissenters • Devil’s advocates • Other versions of Asch

  12. Minority Influence • How do minority groups change things? • Moscovici experiment: a minority of confederates give a plausible but incorrect answer in front of a majority of subjects • Minorities must be consistent: • Direct effect • Latent effect

  13. Moscovici Data:Direct Effect 9 8 7 6 % Ss saying “green” 5 4 3 2 1 consistent inconsistent not present Confederates

More Related