160 likes | 253 Vues
Investigating anchor connections under seismic loading to enhance structural safety, prevent failures, and optimize anchor design for evenly distributing beam weight. Utilizing computer simulations, experimental tests, and analytical studies to improve seismic anchor design provisions.
E N D
Behavior and Design of Cast-in-Place Anchors under Simulated Seismic Loading (NEES-Anchor) Chadd Lane Jian Zhao Assistant Professor WisCamp Undergraduate Research Summer 2009 University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
Abstract Motivation: • Structural safety • Cracks in the cement, broken anchors, or shifting of the beams. • Maximize structural safety • Saving time and money
INTRODUCTION • Behavior of anchor connections • Concrete cracking in tension • Current design regulations • Limited guidance
Problem Statement: • How does one maximize structural safety with the number of anchors, anchor design, and location? • How does one disperse the weight of a large beam evenly among all the anchors?
Key Terminology Concrete Spall Cone— Steel Breakage— Anchor Pullout— Bond Failure— Edge Distance and Spacing Reduction—
Key Terminology continued • Spalled concrete— split, chip, or to break into smaller pieces
Key Terminology coninued • A material can be loaded in: a) compression b) tension c) shear
Approach: • Computer simulation • failure rate of cement and anchors • Real life seismic loading simulation. • Confirm computer simulations • How the cement and anchors should look when they fail. • Understand the full nature of cement and anchors. • Calculations • How to disperse the weight of the large beam evenly amongst all anchors evenly
Anchor Failure Example • One of the anchor bolts was fractured • The other bent under a combined tension and shear action. • The top layer of concrete spalled such that the hairpin, with an intention to help the anchor connection to resist shear, was displaced outside the anchor connection. • Note that the failure of the anchor connection might have contributed to the total collapse of the industrial building.
Experimental tests • The experimental tests include the ongoing single-anchor tests at UWM and the anchor group tests (to be conducted at Illinois in 2010). • Anchors in every test group are subjected to these loadings: tension and shear • The loading frame shown right are set for the various loading patterns. Meanwhile • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3z4YLUqOysI
Experimental tests example • The anchor position is chosen to enable concrete breakout failure. • The same configurations will be cast and tested with various anchor reinforcements to explore practical and effective reinforcement details that can prevent the concrete breakout failure modes. • Headed bars and reinforcement cages are under consideration.
Analytical studies • The single anchor tests will be simulated using finite element models to optimize the anchor reinforcement details. • The proposed design procedures will be incorporated in the MathCAD programs.
RESEARCH • Using the NEES facility at the University of Illinois. • Obtain detailed experimental - cyclic shear and combined tension-shear. • Evaluate current seismic anchor design provisions and develop new • design methodologies and the use of anchor reinforcements. • Create fiber-based connection interface models. • Promote a timely transfer of knowledge
EDUCATION, OUTREACH, & Training • This UWM project is being led by Dr. Zhao • Two graduate students Joshua Johnston and Derek Petersen from UWM and one graduate student from UC are working on the project. • Two undergraduate students Alice Muehlbauer and Chadd Lane.
SUMMARYNEES-Anchor • Seismic behavior and design of cast-in-place anchors/studs using NSF NEES facility and local resources. • Anchor tests that simulate a combination of concrete breakout failure under shear and/or tension. • The focus will be also on the improvement of anchor behavior through using anchor reinforcements. • The research program will generate critical knowledge that advances the seismic design of anchor connections, as well as providing essential information for future revision of anchorage design regulations.
Thanks • Dr. Zhao and his team • WisCamp and McNair Staff and students • All other people that played a roll in this great experience.