1 / 39

Stereo matching Class 10

Stereo matching Class 10. Read Chapter 7 http://cat.middlebury.edu/stereo/. Tsukuba dataset. Stereo. Standard stereo geometry Stereo matching Correlation Optimization (DP, GC) General camera configuration Rectification Plane-sweep. Standard stereo geometry.

britanni-howell
Télécharger la présentation

Stereo matching Class 10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stereo matchingClass 10 Read Chapter 7 http://cat.middlebury.edu/stereo/ Tsukuba dataset

  2. Stereo • Standard stereo geometry • Stereo matching • Correlation • Optimization (DP, GC) • General camera configuration • Rectification • Plane-sweep

  3. Standard stereo geometry pure translation along X-axis

  4. Standard stereo geometry

  5. Stereo matching • Search is limited to epipolar line (1D) • Look for most similar pixel ?

  6. Aggregation • Use more than one pixel • Assume neighbors have similar disparities* • Use correlation window containing pixel • Allows to use SSD, ZNCC, Census, etc.

  7. Comparing image regions Compare intensities pixel-by-pixel I(x,y) I´(x,y) Dissimilarity measures • Sum of Square Differences

  8. Comparing image regions Compare intensities pixel-by-pixel I(x,y) I´(x,y) Similarity measures Zero-mean Normalized Cross Correlation

  9. Comparing image regions Compare intensities pixel-by-pixel I(x,y) I´(x,y) Similarity measures Census only compare bit signature (Real-time chip from TYZX based on Census)

  10. Small windows disparities similar more ambiguities accurate when correct Large windows larger disp. variation more discriminant often more robust use shiftable windows to deal with discontinuities Aggregation window sizes (Illustration from Pascal Fua)

  11. Occlusions (Slide from Pascal Fua)

  12. Real-time stereo on GPU (Yang and Pollefeys, CVPR2003) • Computes Sum-of-Square-Differences (use pixelshader) • Hardware mip-map generation for aggregation over window • Trade-off between small and large support window 290M disparity hypothesis/sec (Radeon9800pro) e.g. 512x512x36disparities at 30Hz GPU is great for vision too!

  13. Exploiting scene constraints

  14. Ordering constraint surface slice surface as a path 6 5 occlusion left 4 3 2 1 4,5 6 1 2,3 5 6 2,3 4 occlusion right 1 3 6 1 2 4,5

  15. Uniqueness constraint • In an image pair each pixel has at most one corresponding pixel • In general one corresponding pixel • In case of occlusion there is none

  16. use reconstructed features to determine bounding box Disparity constraint surface slice surface as a path bounding box disparity band constant disparity surfaces

  17. Similarity measure (SSD or NCC) Optimal path (dynamic programming ) Stereo matching • Constraints • epipolar • ordering • uniqueness • disparity limit • Trade-off • Matching cost (data) • Discontinuities (prior) Consider all paths that satisfy the constraints pick best using dynamic programming

  18. Hierarchical stereo matching Allows faster computation Deals with large disparity ranges Downsampling (Gaussian pyramid) Disparity propagation

  19. Disparity map image I´(x´,y´) image I(x,y) Disparity map D(x,y) (x´,y´)=(x+D(x,y),y)

  20. Example: reconstruct image from neighboring images

  21. Energy minimization (Slide from Pascal Fua)

  22. Graph Cut (general formulation requires multi-way cut!) (Slide from Pascal Fua)

  23. Simplified graph cut (Roy and Cox ICCV‘98) (Boykov et al ICCV‘99)

  24. Stereo matching with general camera configuration

  25. Image pair rectification

  26. ~ image size (calibrated) Planar rectification Distortion minimization (uncalibrated) Bring two views to standard stereo setup (moves epipole to ) (not possible when in/close to image)

  27. Polar rectification (Pollefeys et al. ICCV’99) Polar re-parameterization around epipoles Requires only (oriented) epipolar geometry Preserve length of epipolar lines Choose  so that no pixels are compressed original image rectified image Works for all relative motions Guarantees minimal image size

  28. original image pair planar rectification polar rectification

  29. Example: Béguinage of Leuven Does not work with standard Homography-based approaches

  30. Example: Béguinage of Leuven

  31. Stereo camera configurations (Slide from Pascal Fua)

  32. Multi-camera configurations (illustration from Pascal Fua) Okutami and Kanade

  33. Multi-view depth fusion (Koch, Pollefeys and Van Gool. ECCV‘98) • Compute depth for every pixel of reference image • Triangulation • Use multiple views • Up- and down sequence • Use Kalman filter Allows to compute robust texture

  34. Plane-sweep multi-view matching • Simple algorithm for multiple cameras • no rectification necessary • doesn’t deal with occlusions Collins’96; Roy and Cox’98 (GC); Yang et al.’02/’03 (GPU)

  35. Next class: structured light

More Related