1 / 15

Disturbance Monitoring Work Group Status Report

Disturbance Monitoring Work Group Status Report. By R. Peter Mackin P.E. Planning Coordination Committee Meeting #14 Salt Lake City, UT October 26-27, 2006. Overview. Monitor Installation Status Generator Performance Monitor RFP Compliance with PRC-002 System Probing Tests

bryson
Télécharger la présentation

Disturbance Monitoring Work Group Status Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Disturbance Monitoring Work GroupStatus Report By R. Peter Mackin P.E. Planning Coordination Committee Meeting #14 Salt Lake City, UT October 26-27, 2006 2108 Marchita Way, Carmichael, CA 95608; Phone (916) 359-3986

  2. Overview • Monitor Installation Status • Generator Performance Monitor RFP • Compliance with PRC-002 • System Probing Tests • Outside Data Requests • Disturbance Monitoring White Paper • July 24, 2006 Disturbance • Guidelines for Disturbance Analysis

  3. Monitor Installation Status • All Monitors in the WECC Plan are either committed or in-service. • The one remaining uninstalled monitor should be in-service by the 1st quarter of 2007.

  4. Monitor Installation Status

  5. Generator Performance Monitor RFP • First RFP Received only two responses • Both bids were over 4 times the allocated budget, so the DMWG rejected both bids. • DMWG is has revised the functional specifications to clarify the requirements. • Plan to release the revised RFP later this year. • Responses to this new RFP will be due after the first of next year.

  6. NERC Standard PRC-002 • Requires that each region establish requirements for disturbance monitors • CMG recommended that WECC be found Level 1 non-compliant with this standard • “should” instead of “shall” • WECC still meets all applicable NERC Disturbance Monitoring Requirements

  7. NERC Standard PRC-002 • The DMWG has started the process to revise the WECC standard required by PRC-002. • Replace all “should”s with “shall”s • Reformat to meet the new WECC Standards formatting requirements • Will follow the WECC Standard Development Process

  8. NERC Standard PRC-002 • Status: • Standard Authorization Form has been drafted and should be forwarded on to “Standards Triage Committee” soon. • Once drafting group has been designated, notification will be sent to WECC members per the WECC Standards Development Process.

  9. System Probing Tests • Tests were performed on June 13 & Aug. 22. • Tests were performed by BPA in coordination with WECC technical groups including the DMWG and M&VWG. • Tests included the following staged events: • energization of the Chief Joseph dynamic brake, • insertion of brief sine waves and square waves by modulation of the Pacific HVDC Intertie, • insertion of sustained random noise by modulation of the Pacific HVDC Intertie.

  10. System Probing Tests • The main objectives of these tests include the following: • obtain a seasonal benchmark for dynamic performance of the WECC system, • develop comparative data to evaluate and refine the realism of WECC modeling tools, and • refine and validate methods that identify power system dynamics with minimal or no use of probing signals.

  11. Data Requests By Outside Entities • DMWG surveyed members regarding this subject. • Survey results were not conducive to development of a WECC wide policy. • Only area of consensus was the requirement for an NDA. • Current plan is to provide monitor data contacts to the data requestor so the data requestor can request the data directly from the data owners.

  12. Whitepaper • Disturbance Monitoring Whitepaper • Support for this effort is waning. • Current draft will be retained, but no more effort will be expended at this time.

  13. Disturbance Monitor Data Requests • The DMWG has sent out informal data requests for the following WECC disturbances: • July 24, 2006: Simultaneous multiple contingencies • At approximately 3:28 p.m. there was a separation between Alberta and the rest of the WECC. • Also, at almost the same time, the Vantage-Hanford #1 line relayed, tripping approximately 1600 MW of generation via RAS. • Prolonged oscillations occurred following the trips. • Informal data request to all disturbance monitor owners requesting data for this disturbance. • Currently there are no plans to analyze this event.

  14. Guidelines for Disturbance Analysis • The DMWG will be working with PNNL and the EIPP (Eastern Interconnection Phasor Project) to develop a set of guidelines for disturbance analysis. • EIPP funding is no longer available • Other funding sources are being pursued, but project is currently on hold.

  15. Questions?

More Related