1 / 107

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD. Hamid Zand GT STRUDL Users Group Las Vegas, Nevada June 22-25, 2005. AISC ASD and LRFD. AISC = American Institute of Steel Construction ASD = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth Edition LRFD = Load and Resistance Factor Design

buck
Télécharger la présentation

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD Hamid Zand GT STRUDL Users Group Las Vegas, Nevada June 22-25, 2005

  2. AISC ASD and LRFD • AISC = American Institute of Steel Construction • ASD = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth Edition • LRFD = Load and Resistance Factor Design AISC Third Edition

  3. AISC Steel Design Manuals • 1963 AISC ASD 6th Edition • 1969 AISC ASD 7th Edition • 1978 AISC ASD 8th Edition • 1989 AISC ASD 9th Edition • 1986 AISC LRFD 1st Edition • 1993 AISC LRFD 2nd Edition • 1999 AISC LRFD 3rd Edition

  4. ASD and LRFDMajor Differences • Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based on the forces and moments capacity • Static analysis is acceptable for ASD but nonlinear geometric analysis is required for LRFD • Beams and flexural members • Cb computation

  5. ASD Load Combinations • 1.0D + 1.0L • 0.75D + 0.75L + 0.75W • 0.75D + 0.75L + 0.75E D = dead load L = live load W = wind load E = earthquake load

  6. ASD Load Combinations Or you can use following load combinations with the parameter ALSTRINC to account for the 1/3 allowable increase for the wind and seismic load • 1.0D + 1.0L • 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W • 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E • PARAMETER $ ALSTRINC based on the % increase • ALSTRINC 33.333 LOADINGS 2 3

  7. LRFD Load Combinations • 1.4D • 1.2D + 1.6L • 1.2D + 1.6W + 0.5L • 1.2D± 1.0E + 0.5L • 0.9D± (1.6W or 1.0E) D = dead load L = live load W = wind load E = earthquake load

  8. Deflection Load Combinationsfor ASD and LRFD • 1.0D + 1.0L • 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W • 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E D = dead load L = live load W = wind load E = earthquake load

  9. Forces and Stresses • ASD = actual stress values are compared to the AISC allowable stress values • LRFD = actual forces and moments are compared to the AISC limiting forces and moments capacity

  10. ASTM Steel Grade • Comparison is between Table 1 of the AISC ASD 9th Edition on Page 1-7 versus Table 2-1 of the AISC LRFD 3rd Edition on Page 2-24 • A529 Gr. 42 of ASD, not available in LRFD • A529 Gr. 50 and 55 are new in LRFD • A441 not available in LRFD • A572 Gr. 55 is new in LRFD • A618 Gr. I, II, & III are new in LRFD • A913 Gr. 50, 60, 65, & 70 are new in LRFD • A992 (Fy = 50, Fu = 65) is new in LRFD (new standard) • A847 is new in LRFD

  11. Slenderness Ratio • Compression KL/r≤ 200 • Tension L/r≤ 300

  12. Tension Members • Check L/r ratio • Check Tensile Strength based on the cross-section’s Gross Area • Check Tensile Strength based on the cross-section’s Net Area

  13. Tension Members ASD ft = FX/Ag≤ FtGross Area ft = FX/Ae≤ FtNet Area LRFD Pu = FX ≤ ϕt Pn = ϕt Ag Fyϕt = 0.9 for Gross Area Pu = FX ≤ ϕt Pn = ϕt Ae Fuϕt = 0.75 for Net Area

  14. Tension Members ASD(ASD Section D1) Gross Area Ft = 0.6Fy Net Area Ft = 0.5Fu LRFD(LRFD Section D1) Gross Area ϕt Pn = ϕt Fy Agϕt = 0.9 Net Area ϕt Pn = ϕt Fu Aeϕt = 0.75

  15. Compare ASD to LRFD ASD 1.0D + 1.0L LRFD 1.2D + 1.6L 0.6Fy(ASD) × (1.5) = 0.9Fy(LRFD) 0.5Fu(ASD) × (1.5) = 0.75Fu(LRFD) ASD × (1.5) = LRFD

  16. Tension Members

  17. Tension Members • Member is 15 feet long • Fixed at the top of the member and free at the bottom • Loadings are: • Self weight • 400 kips tension force at the free end • Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes • Steel grade is A992 • Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes

  18. Tension Members ASD W18x46 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989 LRFD W10x49 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989

  19. Tension Members ASD W18x46 Area = 13.5 in.2 FX = 400.688 kips Ratio = 0.989 LRFD W10x49 Area = 14.4 in.2 FX = 640.881 kips Ratio = 0.989

  20. Tension Members Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 640.881 / 400.688 = 1.599 Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD LRFD = (1.5) × ASD Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD LRFD W10x49 Area = 14.4 in.2

  21. Tension Members Code Check based on the ASD9 and using W10x49 FX = 400.734 kips Ratio = 0.928 Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 640.881 / 400.734 = 1.599 LRFD W10x49 Ratio = 0.989

  22. Tension Members ASD Example # 1 Live Load = 400 kips W18x46 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989 LRFD Example # 1 Live Load = 400 kips W10x49 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989 Example # 2 Dead Load = 200 kips Live Load = 200 kips W14x43 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989 Code check W14x43 based on the ASD9 W14x43 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 1.06

  23. Compression Members • Check KL/r ratio • Compute Flexural-Torsional Buckling and Equivalent (KL/r)e • Find Maximum of KL/r and (KL/r)e • Compute Qs and Qa based on the b/t and h/tw ratios • Based on the KL/r ratio, compute allowable stress in ASD or limiting force in LRFD

  24. Compression Members ASD fa = FX/Ag≤ Fa LRFD Pu = FX ≤ ϕc Pn = ϕc Ag Fcr Whereϕc = 0.85

  25. Limiting Width-Thickness Ratiosfor Compression Elements ASD b/t = h/tw = LRFD b/t = h/tw =

  26. Limiting Width-Thickness Ratiosfor Compression Elements Assume E = 29000 ksi ASD b/t = h/tw = LRFD b/t = h/tw =

  27. Compression Members ASDKL/r≤ C′c (ASD E2-1 or A-B5-11) LRFD(LRFD A-E3-2)

  28. Compression Members ASDKL/r > C′c (ASD E2-2) LRFD (LRFD A-E3-3)

  29. Compression Members LRFD

  30. Compression Members ASDLRFD Fcr / Fa = 1.681 LRFD Fcr = ASD Fa× 1.681

  31. Compression Members ASD (ASD C-E2-2) LRFD λc = Maximum of ( λcy , λcz , λe )

  32. Compression Members LRFD Where:

  33. Compression Members Flexural-Torsional Buckling

  34. Qs Computation ASD LRFD

  35. Qs Computation Assume E = 29000 ksi ASD LRFD

  36. Qs Computation ASD LRFD

  37. Qs Computation Assume E = 29000 ksi ASD LRFD

  38. Qa Computation ASD LRFD

  39. Compression Members

  40. Compression Members • Member is 15 feet long • Fixed at the bottom of the column and free at the top • Loadings are: • Self weight • 100 kips compression force at the free end • Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes • Steel grade is A992 • Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes

  41. Compression Members ASD W10x49 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941 LRFD W10x54 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944

  42. Compression Members ASD W10x49 Area = 14.4 in.2 FX = 100.734 kips Ratio = 0.941 LRFD W10x54 Area = 15.8 in.2 FX = 160.967 kips Ratio = 0.944

  43. Compression Members Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 160.967 / 100.734 = 1.598 Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD LRFD Fcr = (1.681) × ASD Fa Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD LRFDW10x54 Area = 15.8 inch

  44. Compression Members Code Check based on the ASD9 and use W10x54 FX = 100.806 kips Ratio = 0.845 Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 160.967 / 100.806 = 1.597 LRFD W10x54 Ratio = 0.944

  45. Compression Members ASD Example # 1 Live Load = 100 kips W10x49 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941 LRFD Example # 1 Live Load = 100 kips W10x54 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944 Example # 2 Dead Load = 50 kips Live Load = 50 kips W10x49 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.921 Code check W10x49 based on the ASD9 W10x49 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941

  46. Flexural Members • Based on the b/t and h/tw ratios determine the compactness of the cross-section • Classify flexural members as Compact, Noncompact, or Slender • When noncompact section in ASD, allowable stress Fb is computed based on the l/rt ratio. l is the laterally unbraced length of the compression flange. Also, Cb has to be computed • When noncompact or slender section in LRFD, LTB, FLB, and WLB are checked • LTB for noncompact or slender sections is computed using Lb and Cb. Lb is the laterally unbraced length of the compression flange

  47. Flexural Members ASD fb = MZ/SZ≤ Fb LRFD Mu = MZ ≤ ϕb Mn Where ϕb = 0.9

  48. Limiting Width-Thickness Ratiosfor Compression Elements ASD LRFD Assume E = 29000 ksi

  49. Flexural MembersCompact Section ASD(ASD F1-1) Fb = 0.66Fy LRFD(LRFD A-F1-1) ϕb Mn = ϕb Mp = ϕb Fy ZZ ≤ 1.5Fy SZ Where ϕb = 0.9

  50. Flexural MembersCompact Section Braced at 1/3 Points

More Related