1 / 6

Status and way forward

Status and way forward. G. Marque-Pucheu EADS October 4 th , 2006. WI scope. Analysis of Incident area networking technologies (Air Interface) based on industry responses received on March 20, 2006.

burian
Télécharger la présentation

Status and way forward

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status and way forward G. Marque-Pucheu EADS October 4th, 2006

  2. WI scope • Analysis of Incident area networking technologies (Air Interface) based on industry responses received on March 20, 2006. • Should use work already done in TIA/TR8.8 and APIC/BBTG and consider 801.11ma, 802.16e, EV-DO and WCDMA. • Shall include a peer review. • Duration: 1 year (April 06-April 07)

  3. Issues • Start of work by EADS/Thalès linked to start of EC funded CHORIST project • Effective start in September • Very heterogeneous proposal • CDMA based proposal mainly covers JAN aspects and analysis of IAN remains somewhat generic (BelAir document) • 802.11 Motorola proposal focus mainly on IAN • EADS & Thalès proposals need to be merged and detailed • More generally, all proposals are of qualitative nature and do not properly address performance issues

  4. Clarification required for progress • To make progress on reformating of proposals, clarification on architecture and performance is required • EADS analysis leads to refining Connection 2 into Connection 2 (PSCD-Vehicle mounted mobile terminal) and Connection 2’ (Vehicle-vehicle) • Link budget requirements are significantly different due to lower power of PSCDs, body losses, deep indoor penetration,… versus roof mounted antenna systems and high power mobiles • Throughput requirements are also significantly different (ad hoc backbone versus end user connection)

  5. Why uniform assumptions are required, in line with actual users requirements • Assume a low power PSCD (100 mW) inside a building, with some body loss (7 dB), transmitting to receiver outside of the building. • 120 dB path loss • Receiver will get –107 dBm (20-120-7) • Noise will be –167 dBm/Hz • To achieve 1 bit/s/Hz, at 5 dB SNR (current technology), maximum transmitted bandwidth will be 300 kHz (55dBHz) • Maximum rate is 300 kbit/s and Shannon limit is slightly above 400 kbit/s • Current analog voice is supporting 144 dB path loss! • Conversely, rates in the range 10-100 Mbit/s is quite easily achievable for higher power transmitter in vehicles (Connection 2’)

  6. Way forward • EADS will present clarification proposal to build a framework for more uniform and more documented proposals, to pave the road for further progress • To lead to quantitative link attributes requirements • As committed, EADS and Thalès will also propose a merged, updated proposal • Inputs about indoor penetration and propagation and required application bandwidths (PS grade video f.e.) are welcome

More Related