350 likes | 447 Vues
Learn about APUFIDC's crucial role under JnNURM in urban infrastructure development, its functions, and the progress made in implementing reforms and projects in Andhra Pradesh.
E N D
APUFIDC: Mandate & ProgressOne Day Integrated Training Programme to Municipal Commissioners, HyderabadJuly 19, 2011 M.I. Ahmed Chief Engineer, APUFIDC
JnNURM • State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for JnNURM (GO MA 123, dt. 04.02.2006) • Functions of SLNA : • Project appraisal • Obtaining sanction of projects from SLSC, • Management of grants and Maintenance of Revolving Fund, • Periodic Reporting to GoI on progress, • Certifying quality of work and progress of reform to GoI • Monitoring physical, financial, and reform progress
About JnNURM • Reform-linked urban infrastructure investment programme launched in 2005. Has four streams of funding managed by two Ministries in GoI:
JnNURM: Mission Statement Reforms driven, fast track development of cities on efficiency in urban infrastructure, service delivery mechanism, community participation, and accountability of ULBs towards citizens
JnNURM: Objectives • Focused attention to integrated development of infrastructure services in cities covered under the Mission • Secure effective linkages between asset creation and asset management so that infrastructure services created in cities are not only maintained efficiently but also become self-sustainable • Ensure adequate investment of funds to fulfill deficiencies in urban infrastructure services • Planned development of identified cities, so that urbanisation takes place in a dispersed manner • Scale up delivery of civic amenities and provision of utilities with emphasis on universal access to poor • urban renewal, i.e. redevelopment of inner city areas to reduce congestion
State achievements: Implementation of JnNURM • Sanction of Projects: 2nd highest in the country (251 costing Rs. 11,877 cr) • Completion: highest number – 66 projects and 1,06,861 houses • ACA drawn = 66% (Rs. 4686/6466 cr) – highest (Rs. 563 cr pending with GoI) • Adoption of Reforms: Maximum progress achieved amongst all states (14 state level reforms completed; Rent Control Reform, Earmarking of land - current financial year; property title certification system – March, 2012)
Non-Mission Cities Rs crore Coverage: Out of 125 towns and cities, 95 are covered (4 Mission Cities (inc. Tirupati – recently declared) and 91 small and medium towns)
Sanctions vis-à-vis Allocation Rs. crore AP has received sanction of nearly Rs. 2000 cr over and above allocation by GoI.
Sector-wise Sanction: UI&G and UIDSSMT Rs. crore 81% of UI&G and UIDSSMT project sanction (Rs. 6313 crore) pertain to WS, UGD, and SWD sectors
JnNURM: Agency-wise Sanction Rs. crore Agency, Project Cost, No. of Projects, Share of sanction
Agency-wise ProgressUIDSSMT / IHSDP Rs. crore IHSDP * Includes partially commissioned schemes
Action Plan – ULB Level Reforms Out of 6 ULB reforms, the following 3 reforms are completed: Double Entry Accrual based Accounting e-Governance Earmarking of Budget for the Poor 4. Another reform (seven point charter – March, 2012) is on target.
5a. User Charges – WS - Over 70 % of O & M Charges are realised ULB Reforms - Progress 5b. User Charges – SWM- Over 70 % of O & M Charges are realised 6. Property Taxation: i. Coverage – More than 85 % Achieved ii. Collection Efficiency – 90% Achieved iii. GIS Survey is under progress
UIDSSMT • The purpose of the project • Whether DPR provisions being met or not • If not what are the short comings • How they can be addressed • Whether new infrastructure is being integrated with new scheme • Quality of infrastructure created • Source drawl - Permission from the Irrigation department • Construction of STPs
Disposal of waste water – storm water drains • Roads project – whether all the roads are inter connected or not • Whether all the benefits as per DPR viz: • Water supply HSCs – can be released or not – if cannot be released the reasons need to be indicated • Sewer Connections - can be released or not – if cannot be released the reasons need to be indicated • If required Financial assistance will be provided by APUFIDC
Completion reports 1 Whether all the completion/as built drawings furnished or not 2 Whether the defect liability period is in currency or not 3 Whether training imparted to ULB staff or not 4 Whether trial run and commissioning of WTPs/STPs witnessed by ULB or not 5 Whether the executing agency providing the necessary help after trial run and commissioning and during additional maintenance and defect liability period to ULB or not
IHSDP • IHSDP - stand alone projects • The purpose of the project • Whether DPR provisions being met or not • If not what are the short comings • How they can be addressed • Whether whole slum approach is adopted or not • Quality of infrastructure created
Connected to the main water supply system or not • Connected to the sewerage system or not • Disposal of waste water – storm water drains • Whether all the benefits viz: • Water supply HSCs • Sewer Connections
A opportunity was provided to 13 ULBs to execute IHSDP projects – they failed to meet • Quality standards • Huge time over runs – cost over runs • Multi Utility community centers – huge delay – site identification • TIPM agencies not happy with the way the adverse reports are attended and furnished • All ULBs are executing similar nature of works – CC roads, SWDs, Street lighting, water supply lines & sewer lines etc • The then Principle Secretary had great faith in ULBS
What should the commissioners need to do to take up JNNURM –II PROJECTS? • They should build the capacity of all the staff working in the ULBs • They need to put in place • Standard preparation of Estimates • Good Quality management tools • Good Work monitoring systems • Transparent e- procurement of tenders • Integration all old and new systems – Water supply, Sewerage system, Storm water drainage system, road net work etc • The short comings can be brought to the notice of the C& DMA with suggestions how to overcome the same