1 / 21

Redesign of Lotus Europa Front Suspension

Redesign of Lotus Europa Front Suspension. ME 450: Finite Element Analysis Spring 2007 Presented by: Bart Sudhoff, Zachary Lightner, Jim Milligan, Brian Schludecker, David Giles Dr. Nema 4/30/2007. Summary & Introduction. Redesign Front Suspension Upper Control Arm

cairo-newton
Télécharger la présentation

Redesign of Lotus Europa Front Suspension

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Redesign of Lotus Europa Front Suspension ME 450: Finite Element Analysis Spring 2007 Presented by: Bart Sudhoff, Zachary Lightner, Jim Milligan, Brian Schludecker, David Giles Dr. Nema 4/30/2007

  2. Summary & Introduction Redesign Front Suspension Upper Control Arm Top Speed Increase: 120 to 200 MPH Design Issues: New weight of car due to increased engine size New handling characteristics

  3. Original Design • Built in 1970 • 1470cc OHV 4 Cylinder Engine – 78HP • Front Wheel Drive • 4-Speed Transmission • Curb Weight: 1320-1570lbs • Top Speed 120 MPH

  4. New Design • Engine: Lexus V8 4.0L Quad Cam • Transmission: Porsche 5-Speed • Suspension: New Design of Lower/Upper Control Arms, Springs, Shocks • Factor of Safety of 5 • Light Weight • Minimal Deformation

  5. Theoretical Background • Decomposition of model into stiffness, force matrices • Solution in form of nodal displacement matrix • 4-node tetrahedral element displacement solution

  6. Model Details • Upper and Lower Control arms modeled using Pro/E • Constraints • Fix – about the mounting holes • Forces applied at ball joint

  7. Model Details

  8. Model Details

  9. Model Details

  10. Results • 2” thick arm • Stress - 20.06 MPa • Deformation - .102 mm • Safety Factor – Greater than 10

  11. Results • 1.75” thick arm • Stress - 25.1 MPa • Deformation - .128 mm • Safety Factor – Greater than 5

  12. Results • 1.75” thick arm with relief • Stress - 18.9 MPa. • Deformation - .131 mm • Safety Factor – Greater than 5

  13. Results • 1.5” thick arm with relief • Stress - 24.4 MPa • Deformation - .184 mm • Safety Factor – Greater than 5

  14. Results • 1.5” thick arm with relief • Vertical Bump • Stress - 3.82 MPa • Deformation - .0229mm • Safety Factor – Greater than 10 • Rebound • Stress - 14 MPa • Deformation - .106mm. • Safety Factor – Greater than 10

  15. Conclusion • Chose 1 ½” control arm with relief cuts • Passed factor of safety tests • has allowable deformation • Will allow car to go 200 mph

More Related