1 / 17

Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology

Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology. 1. Statistical distributions. Why are we interested in “average” growing conditions over time? Average = SIGNAL. Means we must shoot for an average or mean when we sample. Suggests we also must know the variability about this mean.

cais
Télécharger la présentation

Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Statistical Principles in Dendrochronology

  2. 1. Statistical distributions • Why are we interested in “average” growing conditions over time? • Average = SIGNAL. Means we must shoot for an average or mean when we sample. • Suggests we also must know the variability about this mean. • Which means we must be familiar with statistical distributions, which are defined by mean and variance: • e.g., the normal distribution, the t-distribution, the z-distribution, the Weibull distribution

  3. 1. Statistical distributions • population • samples are drawn • uncertainty = sampling error = noise • maximize signal (= average), minimize noise • be aware of sampling bias: examples? • easy access • physical limitations (altitude, health) • low budget • downright laziness!

  4. 1. Statistical distributions • samples are drawnfrom a population • descriptive statistics arecalculated (e.g. mean, median,mode, standard deviation,minimum, maximum,range) • frequency distributionis calculated

  5. 2. Central Limit Theorem • a. Sample statistics have distributions. • b. These are normally distributed (considers both mean and variance). • c. As one increases sample size, our sample statistic approaches the population statistic. Example: from a population of five trees, we can only sample three. For the year 1842, the five trees had the following ring widths: 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.50 2.00 population mean = ? average of all sample means = ?

  6. 2. Central Limit Theorem population mean = 1.15 (0.50+0.75+1.00)/3 = 0.75 (0.50+0.75+1.50)/3 = 0.92(0.50+0.75+2.00)/3 = 1.08(0.50+1.00+1.50)/3 = 1.00(0.50+1.00+2.00)/3 = 1.17(0.50+1.50+2.00)/3 = 1.33(0.75+1.00+1.50)/3 = 1.08(0.75+1.50+2.00)/3 = 1.42(1.00+1.50+2.00)/3 = 1.50 average of all sample means = 1.14 (rounding error here) 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.50 2.00

  7. 2. Central Limit Theorem Sample size means everything! The more samples one collects, the closer one obtains information on the population itself! • Average conditions become more prominent. • The variability about the mean becomes less prominent. • Notice relationship with S/N ratio! Signal increases while noise decreases!

  8. Y X 3. Sampling Design • A procedure for selecting events from a population • Pilot sample (or pretest) • Simple random sample • random number generators are handy for x/y selection

  9. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 3. Sampling Design • Systematic random sample • select k-th individual from gridded population • lay out a line = transect, sample individual nearest the pre-selected point

  10. 3. Sampling Design • Stratified random sample • population is layered into strata and then we conduct random or systematic sampling within each cell

  11. 8 4 5 1 8 1 9 5 2 3. Sampling Design • Stratified, systematic, unaligned = point sampling • Hybrid technique, favored among geographers

  12. 8 4 5 1 8 1 9 5 2 3. Sampling Design • Stratified, systematic, unaligned = point sampling • Hybrid technique, favored among geographers

  13. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 3. Sampling Design • Transect = line sampling, but must have a random component! (How can this be accomplished?) • Many variations: • Sample all individuals along the transect (row 1) • Sample quadrats along the transect (row 2) • Sample all individuals within a belt (row 3)

  14. 3. Sampling Design • Targeted sampling = non-random sampling • Is this a legitimate technique? • It is often necessary because of: • Time constraints • Budget constraints • Lack of field labor • Physical limitations of field labor • Topographic limitations • Advantages? • Maximize information with minimum resources • Target areas where samples are known to exist • Less time needed and less money wasted

  15. 3. Sampling Design • Targeted sampling = non-random sampling • Used in practically all types of dendro research: fire history, climate reconstruction, insect outbreak studies, …

  16. X X X X X X X X 3. Sampling Design • Specifically sample only trees that have best record of fire scars. (dots = trees, circles = trees collected with fire scars, X’s = fire scars, but not sampled = poor record.) • What issues must we consider? Topography, slope, aspect, hydrology, tree density: all affect susceptibility to scarring by fire. Shallow slope area Valley bottom Steep slope area

  17. 3. Sampling Design • Complete inventory is possible • Sample all trees that have fire scars, regardless of number of scars or quality of preservation, but … • Not very efficient (time, money, labor) • Benefits are considerable, though.

More Related