1 / 11

ES&H Status of Construction and Technical System Installations

ES&H Status of Construction and Technical System Installations. Michael Scharfenstein Project ES&H Coordinator. Subcontracted Work Goals. GC managed Injury rate concern Project responsibility 90 days of field work remaining The goal is Zero future incidents

Télécharger la présentation

ES&H Status of Construction and Technical System Installations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ES&H Status of Construction and Technical System Installations Michael Scharfenstein Project ES&H Coordinator

  2. Subcontracted Work Goals • GC managed • Injury rate concern • Project responsibility • 90 days of field work remaining • The goal is Zero future incidents • CF & Technical Systems Installation • Maintaining exemplary safety record • Direct subcontractor management • Detailed work planning

  3. Project-specific ISEMS Implementation • LCLS Directorate Integrated Safety Management Plan • LCLS Work Authorization Procedure • LCLS Project ES&H Plan • Job Safety Analysis • Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings • PM/UTR manages each subcontract • Leads to success • TCCO Project Health and Safety Plan • Job Safety Analysis • Daily Pre-Task Planning Meeting • Pre-Task Checklist • Superintendents assigned geographically

  4. PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCEThrough April 2008 DART Rate • Total Project Hours • 1.8 M Hours worked • SubContractors • 484 K Hours worked • DART Rate 3.7 (9 Incidents) • TRC Rate 4.6 (2 Incidents) • LCLS Collaboration • 1,300 K Hours worked • DART Rate 0.3 (2 Incidents) Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort. DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate of < 0.25 and a Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0.65 per 100 FTEs.

  5. Project Safety(Contractor/Technical Systems/Collaboration)

  6. TCCo Incident Distribution

  7. TCCo Stewardship • October ’06 thru April ’07 Ramp Up to Full Production : Procedural Violations • Stand Down of Construction Activities : All Hands Meeting • Review of Work Planning Process for field work – JSA process inadequate • Check/correction of existing documentation • PMT changes • Deficiency Notices • May ’07 thru November ’07 Full Production : Injuries • Multi-day Stand Down of Construction Activities : Corrective Action Plan • Procedural violations transition to injures • Paperwork ineffectively utilized by CM/GC and trade contractors • PE changes • Deficiency Notices & Fines • Communication with Corporate TCCo • Safety Stewardship Committee Established • Full time on-site medic (+30hr OSHA) • UTRs added – focus on safety

  8. TCCo Stewardship cont’d • December ’07 thru April ’08 : Injuries continue • Two incident associated with one sub • PM removed • Work stopped • 90 Days (to the end of field work) • Focus on effective work planning & execution sought • Plan for joint observation developed • Attendance at daily morning work planning meetings • JSA review with workers throughout the day • Identification / monitoring of specific trades or tasks for safe work practices • Must communicate with the worker • The goal is Zero!

  9. CF & Technical Systems Stewardship • Excellent Safety Record • 100K+ hours w/o injury • S20, MMF, Injector, BC 1 & 2 • Issues addressed immediately • Positive Results • Project Managers / UTRs / Installation Managers • Direct management of subcontractors • Communicate ES&H Expectations • Guide them to success • Enforcement when needed • Thorough Work Planning and Control • Aggressive ISM management • Ownership of safety a condition of employment • The goal is to maintain Zero!

  10. Conclusion • Past TCCo safety performance is not acceptable • LCLS providing more prescriptive direction • Past 2 months = acceptable performance • Maintain CF & Technical System direct managed work performance • The goal is Zero!

  11. end of presentation

More Related