1 / 21

Cell Segmentation in Microscopy Imagery Using a Bag of Local Bayesian Classifiers

Cell Segmentation in Microscopy Imagery Using a Bag of Local Bayesian Classifiers. Zhaozheng Yin RI/CMU, Fall 2009. Motivation. Accurate segmentation is challenging. Segmentation using a single threshold yields poor results:.

cardea
Télécharger la présentation

Cell Segmentation in Microscopy Imagery Using a Bag of Local Bayesian Classifiers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cell Segmentation in Microscopy Imagery Using a Bag of Local Bayesian Classifiers Zhaozheng Yin RI/CMU, Fall 2009

  2. Motivation • Accurate segmentation is challenging Segmentation using a single threshold yields poor results: Segmentation using a singe global Bayesian classifier also generates bad results:

  3. Our Solution • A bag of local Bayesian classifiers: • Local Bayesian classifiers (experts) are learned from clustered training image patches. • Any new pixel to be classified is assigned a posterior probability about how likely it is a cell or background pixel based on the mixture-of-experts model.

  4. System Overview Train and combine a bag of local Bayesian classifiers: Using the Bayes’ rule on each local Bayesian classifier, we have : where: is the feature around pixel x, for example, intensity, gradient etc. represents pixel class (Cell or Background ) is the weight dependent on the input (different from boosting) A new input pixel is classified by Maximum a Posteriori (MAP):

  5. Training (get ) • Spectral clustering on local histograms (a) Compute local histograms around N sample pixels (b) Compute a pair-wise similarity matrix among the N histograms. (c) Group the N histograms into K clusters.

  6. Training (get ) 2. Train local Bayesian classifiers (d) Achieve local histogram clusters from the spectral clustering (e) Obtain corresponding clustered image patches (f) Train local Bayesian classifiers from the clustered image patches

  7. Classification • First , we calculate a local histogram around , and then compute the similarity between and every histogram cluster, , where represents the histogram of cluster . • The weighting function on classifier is defined as • We combine the local Bayesian classifiers as • Pixel is classified by

  8. Classifier 2 Classifier 3 Classifier 1 h=5 win size h=10 h=15

  9. Results

  10. Cyan square: miss detection Yellow circle: false alarm Red: our detection Green contour: ground truth

  11. Cyan square: miss detection Yellow circle: false alarm Red: our detection Green contour: ground truth

  12. Cyan square: miss detection Yellow circle: false alarm Red: our detection Green contour: ground truth

  13. Cyan square: miss detection Yellow circle: false alarm Red: our detection Green contour: ground truth

  14. Cyan square: miss detection Yellow circle: false alarm Red: our detection Green contour: ground truth

  15. Input: Cell posterior probability: Ground truth labeling:

  16. Bayesian Classifiers on DIC Images • We use intensity and gradient features on DIC images 10 bin Ix (intensity) 10 bin Gx (gradient magnitude)

  17. Cluster k=1 k=2 k=3 Win sz h = 5 h = 10 h = 20

  18. Conclusion • We propose a bag of local Bayesian classifier approach for cell segmentation in microscopy imagery. • Our approach is validated on four types of cells of different appearances captured by different imaging modalities and device settings with 92.5% average accuracy.

More Related