Elliptical vs Spiral

2. Elliptical vs Spiral NGC 4649 NGC 4649 Visible Far-UV

3. (2500 A) (1500 A)

4. "UV UPTURN"

5. Te ~ 20000 K "UV UPTURN"

6. "Burstein Relation" (SAURON sample ETGs, GALEX) (IUE) bluer Bureau et al., MNRAS, 414, 1887, 2011

7. Minimum Te for FUV output

8. Post AGB . Post EHB .

9. Omega Centauri – FUV CMD EHB and Post-EHB Omega Centauri FUV Image (UIT)

10. UV-Optical Colors in Coma Cluster(Smith et al. 2012) bluer

11. UV-Optical Colors in Coma ClusterColors vs Velocity Dispersion bluer Smith et al., MNRAS, 421, 2982, 2012

12. UV-Optical Colors in Coma ClusterColors vs Age & Metallicity bluer Smith et al., MNRAS, 421, 2982, 2012

13. "Residual Star Formation" (0.1-1 Gyr) in ETG's:Intermediate-Age Populations

14. Distinguishing RSF from UV-Upturn in ETG's (Kaviraj 2007) Strongest UV-upturn At least 30% of ETGs exhibit RSF UV colors

15. Supp-Ex

16. UV CMD for M32 (Brown, et al. 2008)

17. UV CMD for M32 (Brown, et al. 2008) ~ No PAGB stars Few P-EHB stars EHB

18. Simulation: [Fe/H] = -0.25, Y = normal Bimodal HB, 2% in EHB Small scatter in extinction Brown et al. 2008

19. Extended Emission Line Gas in SAURON ETG's (Sarzi 2006)

21. Globular Clusters vs Galaxies (DOR 95)

22. M87 Globulars vs MWGC, Galaxies (Sohn et al. 2006)

23. Supp-Ex

24. Post AGB . Post EHB .

25. * } } ☉ H H P P ☉ m     g Ṁ Ṁ Arial 24 Map: U-I color Contours: Radio Feedback GillSansMT-bold Helv24 Shadowed helvetica calibri

27. Special Fonts  _ _    