International Strategic Alliances: Design and Management

1. 8 International Strategic Alliances: Design and Management

2. Strategic Alliances Issues • Increasingly popular strategy to develop new product and to expand into new markets • However, strategic alliances are very risky and unstable • Failure rate of 30% to 60% • Even profitable alliances can be torn by conflict

3. Exhibit 8.1: Implementing a Strategic-Alliance Strategy

4. Exhibit 4.3: The Value Chain(not included in the exam)

5. Where to Link in the Value Chain • Alliance combining same value-chain activities are to gain efficiencies, merge talents, or share risks • Upstream/downstream alliances serve the objective of low-cost supply/manufacturing • Operations/marketing alliances provide access to markets • Depends on the objective that the firm seeks to achieve

6. Criteria for Choosing Partners • Seek out companies with compatible management styles • Seek a partner that will provide the “right” level of mutual dependency • Avoid the “anchor” partner • Anchor partner: a partner that holds back the strategic alliance because it cannot or will not provide its share of the funding

7. Criteria for Choosing Partners (cont.) • Be cautious of the “elephant-and-ant” complex • Occurs when two companies are greatly unequal in size • Assess operating-policy differences with potential partners • Assess the difficulty of cross-cultural communication with a likely partner

8. Choosing an Alliance Type • Three main types of strategic alliances • Informal international cooperative alliances • Formal international cooperative alliances • International joint venture

9. Informal International Cooperative Alliance • Non-legally binding agreements between companies from two or more countries • Agreements of any kind • Provide links anywhere on their value chains • Limited involvement between companies

10. Formal Cooperative Alliances • Higher degree of involvement than informal alliances • Formal contract • Popular in high tech industries because of high costs and risks

11. International Joint Ventures (IJV) • Separate legal entity owned by two or more parent companies from different countries • No need for equal ownership • Equity based on cash or other contributions • Ex.: One partner brings technology while other partner brings financial contributions

12. Exhibit 8.5: Types of Alliances

13. Negotiating the Agreement • IJV negotiation issues • equity contributions • management structure • “prenuptial” agreements

14. Exhibit 8.6: Selected Questions for a Strategic-Alliance Agreement

15. Organizational Design in Strategic Alliances • Depends on the type of alliance chosen • Informal ICAs often have no formal design issues • Formal ICAs may require separate organization unit housed in one company • IJV—Parent companies set up separate legal entity

16. Decision-making Control • Majority ownership does not necessarily control • Operational decisions • Strategic decisions • In IJVs, strategic decision making takes place at the level of IJV’s board of directors or top management.

17. Management Structures • Dominant parent: controls or dominates strategic decision making • Often has majority ownership • Treats the IJV as wholly owned subsidiary • Shared management: both parent companies contribute approximately the same number of managers to the alliance organization

18. Management Structures • Split control management control: partners usually share strategic decision making and split functional decision making • Independent management structure: alliance managers act more like managers from a separate company • IJVs often recruit managers from outside the parent companies

19. Management Structures • Rotating management: key positions rotate among partners • Popular in developing countries • Trains management talent and transfers expertise

20. Choosing a Strategic Alliance Management Structure • If partners have similar technologies or know-how and contribute equally • Shared management structure preferred • If partners have different technologies but contribute equally • Split management structure preferred • If one partner has dominant equity position • Dominant management structure more likely

21. Human Resource Management in Strategic Alliances • HRM functions include recruiting and staffing for alliance positions • The HRM functions of an IJV are more complex • Managers (and sometimes workers) come from two or more firms or from two or more cultures

22. Critical HRM Problems and Issues • HRM planning: Employees need to know strategic intent of alliance. • Parent involvement: As alliances get older and larger, they tend to develop their own HRM practices. • Staffing the alliance management and technical personnel—crucial and risky decision • Staffing the alliance workforce • Assigning managers strategic or operations tasks

23. Critical HRM Problems and Issues • Performance assessment—needed for retention, promotion and salary decisions • Loyalty—managers may often feel dual loyalty • To parent and to alliance • Career development—must provide clear information on how alliance assignments fit within careers • Cultural differences • Training

24. Commitment and Trust • Commitment: putting forth extra effort to make the venture work • Attitudinal commitment: willingness to dedicate resources and efforts and face risks to make the alliance work • If partners demonstrate these aspects of commitment, alliance will develop based on fair exchange. • Occurs when partners believe that they receive benefits from the relationship equal to their contributions

25. Calculative Commitment • Commitment also has a practical side: calculative commitment • Alliance partner evaluations, expectations, and concerns regarding potential rewards from the relationship • Businesses require tangible outcomes for a relationship to continue

26. Trust • Commitment and trust go hand in hand • Credibility trust: confidence that the partner has the intent and ability to meet promised obligations and commitments • Benevolent trust: confidence that the partner will behave with goodwill and with fair exchange

27. Exhibit 8.8: The Trust/Commitment Cycle

28. Why Is Trust Important? • When there is no trust, partners hold back or take advantage of each other. • Formal contracts can never identify all issues that will arise • Technology and knowledge also include tacit elements that can only be learned through trust.

29. Building and Sustaining Trust and Commitment • Pick your partner carefully • Know each side’s strategic goals • Seek win-win situations • Go slowly • Invest in cross-cultural training • Invest in direct communication • Find the right levels of trust and commitment

30. Exhibit 8.9: The “Right” Levels of Trust and Commitment

31. Assessing the Performance of an International Strategic Alliance • If strategic intent is to produce immediate results, standard financial and efficiency measures can be used. • Other strategic alliance provide indirect strategic benefits. • IJV and ICA performance criteria: often must include criteria other than financial, such as organizational learning.

32. If the Alliance Does Not Work • Negotiate an end or improve implementation • Know when to quit/invest more • Avoid “escalation of commitment” • Companies continue in an alliance longer than necessary because of financial and emotional investments. • Plan end—“prenuptial agreements” • Death not always failure