1 / 11

Preliminary Considerations for Structures in Kevin Dahya's Team B: Artificial Gravity, Materials, Re-entry, Radiation Sh

This article explores the preliminary considerations for structures in Kevin Dahya's Team B, including artificial gravity, materials (composites vs. aluminum), re-entry, radiation shielding, and future considerations. It also discusses the pros and cons of artificial gravity, compares different materials, and explores re-entry materials and radiation shielding options.

cbaugh
Télécharger la présentation

Preliminary Considerations for Structures in Kevin Dahya's Team B: Artificial Gravity, Materials, Re-entry, Radiation Sh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AAE 450 Kevin Dahya Team B Structures

  2. Preliminary Considerations • Artificial Gravity • Materials • Composites vs. Aluminum • Re-entry • Radiation Shielding • Future Considerations • Skills

  3. Artificial Gravity? • Pros • Crew better suited for earth’s gravity • No exercise regiment needed on return • Cons • More expensive • More complicated analysis

  4. Materials • Composites • Lighter weight (1.87 g/cm^3) • Stronger • Higher initial cost • Aluminum • Less initial cost • More weight (2.77 g/cm^3) • Less strength • Easier repair ability

  5. PRODUCT COMPARISON TABLE Comparison Table COI Materials Product COI Materials Advantage Comparable Product HR40/CE-3 High Strength M40J/Cyanate Ester HS40/CE-3 High Strength M46J/Cyanate Ester SR40/CE-3 Dimensional Stability with High Modulus M55J/Cyanate Ester TR30S/CE-3 Standard Modulus T300/Cyanate Ester K13710/CE-3 High Modulus HM/Cyanate Ester K1392U/CE-3 UltraHigh Modulus, Low Cost UHM/Cyanate Ester K13C2U/CE-3 UltraHigh Modulus, Moderate Thermal Conductivity K800/Cyanate Ester K13D2U/CE-3 UltraHigh Modulus, High Thermal Conductivity K1100/Cyanate Ester K63312/CE-3 Intermediate Modulus, Low Cost M46J/Cyanate Ester K63712/CE-3 High Modulus, Low Cost HM/Cyanate Ester HR40/301-1 High Strength M40J/Epoxy SR40/301-1 Dimensional Stability M55J/Epoxy TR30S/301-1 Standard Modulus, Low Cost T300/Epoxy K13C2U/301-1 UltraHigh Modulus, Moderate Thermal Conductivity K800/Epoxy K63712/Epoxy High Modulus, Low Cost HM/Epoxy 34-600/301-1 High Strength, Low Cost M46J/Epoxy Materials (cont.)

  6. Materials (cont.)

  7. Re-entryMaterials • High Temperatures (3000 K ?) • German Aerospace Center • Intended for CRV in 2003 • Can Withstand 2073 K • Ready for 2003 • Fiber reinforced ceramic • Space Shuttle experiences 1500 K

  8. Re-entry Materials (cont.) • Inflatable Re-entry Vehicle • Less Weight • Smaller Vehicle • Temperatures? • Cost? • Flown in 1996

  9. Radiation Shielding • Galactic Cosmic Rays • Solar Flares • High Temperature Superconductors • Electromagnetic Shielding • Liquid Hydrogen, Water, Aluminum, Lead • Polyethelyne

  10. Future Considerations • Further analysis of materials • Cost vs. weight • Repair ability • Strength • ERV sizing code • Maximum Efficiency

  11. Skills • AAE 454 • Structures Dept. Swales Aerospace • Femap/Nastran • Pro/Engineer • Autocad

More Related