1 / 27

Instructional Improvement Systems

Instructional Improvement Systems. Wednesday, February 13, 2013 Suzan Kinaci, MA Department of Education Marsha Ward, OH Department of Education DeDe Conner, KY Department of Education Joyce Popp, ID Department of Education. Massachusetts. Massachusetts. Initial Proposed Visions

cece
Télécharger la présentation

Instructional Improvement Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Instructional Improvement Systems • Wednesday, February 13, 2013 • Suzan Kinaci, MA Department of Education • Marsha Ward, OH Department of Education • DeDe Conner, KY Department of Education • Joyce Popp, ID Department of Education

  2. Massachusetts

  3. Massachusetts Initial Proposed Visions • Massachusetts Teaching and Learning - RTTT • Curriculum – Model Curriculum Units • Assessment – Assessment Bank • Digital Library • SIF & P-20 - SLDS Evolution as of Summer 2011 • Edwin • Edwin Analytics • Edwin Teaching & Learning Stock photo.  Release for web use of this photo on file.

  4. Massachusetts, cont. Edwin - Analytics (Build) • Student Profiles • Analytic tools, Reporting, Dashboards • EWIS Edwin Teaching and Learning (Procure) • Joint procurement with Ohio • Comprehensive, integrated, standards-based single-sign-on • Curriculum Tools – MCUs, Lesson Plans, Curr. Maps • Assessment Tools – Formative, Interim Assessments, Public & Secure item banks, ability to create/deliver online, paper-based and performance-based assessments

  5. Massachusetts, cont. Edwin Teaching and Learning (cont.) • Assessment Reporting & Dashboards • Digital Resources – high quality, vetted resources available through federated searches – PBS Learning Media and other publishers • Career/Vocational Technical Education • Parallel efforts • IDM • Portal • SLC • LRMI/LR • ETDU • Timeline • 20% of RTTT ET&L LEAs by end of SY2012-13 • 90% by end of grant – Summer 2014

  6. Massachusetts, cont. Areas of Progress • Joint Procurement – requirements through award • Collaboration with other IIS states • Sharing resources • Sharing best practices • Sustainability planning • Marketing Ongoing Challenges • SIF implementation • Data Quality • Multiple Competing initiatives • Content tagging

  7. Massachusetts and Ohio How about that joint procurement? • Why? • RTTT CIO/IIS meetings • Build or Buy – Buy! • Lead state • T&Cs • Similar requirements • How? • Agreed-upon priorities • Economies of scale • Shared resources Would we do it again? YES • Benefits? • Credibility • Broader district input • Two sets of reviews • Sharing strengths • Requirements validation • Best practices • Challenges • Different procurement processes • More schedules to juggle • More consensus to reach

  8. OHIO

  9. Ohio Initial IIS Structure and Components: • Online access to electronic curriculum, resources and tools aligned to the revised standards • Curriculum customization for differentiated instruction • Online formative and interim assessments • Data-analysiscapabilities including early-warning indicatorsfor teachers, administrators, parents, and students

  10. Photo(s) are stock photos.

  11. Ohio, Cont. RttT requirement to have a qualifying IIS • State IIS • Qualifying LEA IIS State IIS Adoption Rate Based on LEA RttT Scopes of Work • Year 1 – 30% • Year 2 – 38% • Year 3 – 45% Commitment Letters due in March

  12. Ohio, Cont. Thinkgate Implementation Timeline Core UAT February/March 2013 Ohio Pilot April/May 2013 RttT LEA Rollout Completed by March 2014 Non-RttT LEA Rollout Photo(s) are stock photos.

  13. Kentucky

  14. Kentucky Scope of IMS defined by: • Senate Bill 1 (2009) laid out an aggressive plan to transform education in Kentucky – Unbridled Learning • new, more rigorous standards • new assessments • assessment literacy for educators • a new accountability system Designed with the following goals in mind: • Better prepare students for life after high school and to compete globally • College/career-readiness for ALL

  15. large images Continuous Improvement Photo(s) are stock photos.

  16. Kentucky, cont. IMS Data: • Utilize statewide SIS/LDS to populate- data refreshed weekly • Student-level data includes – demographics, programs, courses, grades and assessments. • Teacher-level data includes – teacher demographics, classroom rosters • Materials Available – Pearson, State-created, District/School-created, PD360 & Common Core 360, Model Curriculum framework, Hippo Campus, KET Encyclopedia; Kentucky Learning Depot, KY Virtual Library, Partnership for 21st Century Skills, SAS, Thinkfinity, Kentucky iTunes U. • Standards – English/Language Arts & Mathematics

  17. Kentucky, cont. Common Core Standards Use: • Kentucky academic standards and aligned instructional resources available. • Classroom standards mastery and item analysis reports help guide instruction Includes a drag-and-drop lesson planner with the characteristics of highly effective teaching and learning Stock photo.  Release for web use of this photo on file.

  18. Kentucky, cont. Assess Admin Module • Includes a test item bank with more than 11,000 questions aligned to E/LA and mathematics standards • Create express tests or design a test using your own questions • Supports assessment FOR learning VIDEO LINK Stock photo.  Release for web use of this photo on file.

  19. Kentucky, cont. Rollout • Pilot districts Spring 2011; full rollout to all 174 districts November 2011. • Webinar training – for teachers/administrators • Face-to-Face – for train the trainer • On-demand training • Summer 2012 – Capacity Building Training Regionally through Co-ops

  20. Kentucky Lessons Learned • Communication is key • Information isn’t always shared • Peer pressure works. Share successes. • Monitor and report on use • Use drives data quality • Data being used in a different way can bring issues to light. • Help Desk(s) play critical role • Training resource • Boots on the ground – “gather intelligence”

  21. Idaho

  22. Idaho Define Ultimate Goal – Foundational • Tools to improve student achievement • Ease of use • Relevant data to the classroom • Excellent resources for teachers and administrators • Classroom assessment – formative data Assessment – Standards – Curriculum • Assessments to show progress on constant and predictive level. • Individualized instruction based on standards mastery • Lesson plans design • Expedient feedback on student’s progress and understanding • Specific Concepts and Theories

  23. Idaho, cont. Digital Content • Standards aligned videos • 24 X 7 Learning environment for students and teachers • Flipped classroom • Student Engagement State approved item repository • Ease of creation for relevant assessments • Items aligned to common core standards • District Management of Assessments • End of Course • Benchmark Stock photo. 

  24. Using Statewide Longitudinal Data SLDS File Set Transmit Data from District to State Data Quality Checked • School Calendar • Student Demographics • Student Course Enrollment • Student Daily Attendance • Staff Demographics • Staff Assignments • Teacher Attendance • Special Ed Details • Gifted Student Details • Student Test Results • Student Discipline Tracking ISDE Students Come First System (CORE) SchoolNet (IIS) Portal

  25. Instructional Improvement System Views Teachers Administrators Students 25 Stock photo.  Release for web use of this photo on file.

  26. Mastery reporting, differentiation, and item analysis small images Stock photo.  Release for web use of this photo on file. Fictitious names.

  27. Contacts & Additional Resources Contact information: Suzan Kinaci, SKinaci@doe.mass.edu Marsha Ward, Marsha.Ward@ode.state.oh.us Dede Conner, Dede.Conner@education.ky.gov Joyce Popp, jpopp@sde.idaho.gov Corey Chatis, corey.chatis@sst-slds.org

More Related