1 / 14

HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!),

HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!), Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp Agust,www,...rempi/hcl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007km.ppt Comparison of VHW andf KM data comparison of independent collected data

chapa
Télécharger la présentation

HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!),

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HCl, V, v´=14, vs J´, power and operator(!), • Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp Agust,www,...rempi/hcl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007km.ppt • Comparison of VHW andf KM data • comparison of independent collected data • Power dependence effects • J ´ dependence effects • - relevant to relative mass intensities

  2. From KM:

  3. 35Cl+ Ca. Normalized to H35Cl+ J´=5 J´=6 J´=7

  4. H+ J´=0 J´=7 J´=6 No clear trend

  5. Comment: I(35Cl+)/I(H35Cl+) increases for J´>4, i.e as J´=5 <J´=6<J´=7 whereas I(H+)/I(H35Cl+) is approximatelly constant It is pitty that J´= 8 was not recorded The following experiment was a test for the relative peak intensities for J´=7:

  6. Suggests that the focus point is not on the beam(?) From:Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp i.e.km data From:Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass Vstate Q7-02007km.pxp

  7. Comment: -Hence it looks as if the I(35Cl+) / I(H35Cl+) -ratio is reproducable Now lets compare these results with those from Wang, i.e.

  8. J´=7 H35Cl+ J´=7 35Cl+ VHW KM: From:Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass Vstate Q7-02007km.pxp Agust,heima, ..../REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-210907vhwak.pxpi.e. From VHW, J´=7

  9. J´=7 J´=7 VHW KM From:Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp i.e.km data Agust,heima, ..../REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-210907vhwak.pxpi.e. From VHW, J´=7

  10. Comment:slides 7 & 8 => • VHW and KM compare nicely about the relative structure/intensities • for J´=7 (V, v´=14) • What about J´=8? • Look at agust,heima,......HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-250907vhw.pxp • VHW did perform three independent measurements on J´=8: • Two 210907 (showing peak on high mass side) and • One 250907 (showing no peak on high mass side) • They “roughly” look the same, hence I decided to look at the • one from 250907:

  11. Power dependence: Normalized: H35Cl+ 35Cl+ J´=8

  12. 5 windows H+ 0 window

  13. J´=8 J´=7 VHW KM .agust,heima,......HCl,agust07-/HCl VQ7,8,PvsI-250907vhw.pxp From:Agust,heima,...REMPI/HCl/HCl,agust07-/HClmass V(14)state Q0-7-161007kmak.pxp i.e.km data

  14. Comment: • J´=8 very little power dependence of relative intensities: • possibly slight change in I(H+)/I(H35Cl+) and I(35C+)/I(H35Cl+) (?) • I(35Cl+) / I(H35Cl+) almost the same for J´=7 and 8.

More Related