1 / 14

EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY

EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY. ISSUE 1. National Academy of Sciences Review ·  NAS review of state of the science regarding CAFOs and Air Quality Response: ·   National Center white papers on air quality : Odor mitigation (includes H2S) Ammonia Particulate matter (PM) Site selection

charissa-douglas
Télécharger la présentation

EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY ISSUE 1. National Academy of Sciences Review · NAS review of state of the science regarding CAFOs and Air Quality • Response: ·  National Center white papers on air quality: • Odor mitigation (includes H2S) • Ammonia • Particulate matter (PM) • Site selection • Health effects of odor • Others (?) ·Recommended point of departure for NAS review. ·National Center—resource scientists/engineers.

  2. National Center for Manure & Animal Waste Management • White Papers, 2001: State-of-the-art summaries on: • Odor Mitigation,Sweeten, Jacobson, Heber, et al. • Particulates,Auvermann, Bottcher, Heber, Meyer, Parnell, Worley. • Ammonia,Arogo, Westerman, Heber, Robaarge, Classen. • Site Selection,Jacobson, et al. • Health effects,Schiffman, Bottcher, Auvermann. • December 11-12, 2001

  3. EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY • ISSUE 2. Revised Emission Factors • Response: • National Center White Papers address: • Emission concentrations, rates, emission factors. • Emission control practices (odor, PM, H2S, NH3, VOC) • Research & development needs. * Before emissions regulations can be developed: • Develop & evaluate standardized methodologies for emission measurement & calculation of emission rates. • Validate models • Develop control practices for emissions.

  4. Air Quality Emissions: Descriptors Emission Descriptors 1. Concentration = mass/vol. g/m3, or OU/m3. 2. Emission rate = mass released/unit time (kg/day) = concentration x airflow rate 3. Flux = mass/unit time/unit area (kg/day/m2). 4. Emission factor = emission rate/process size descriptor = mass/unit time/capacity (or throughput), kg/day/head. 5. Emissions inventory = source or category emissions contribution to airshed, kg/yr, or tons/yr.

  5. EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY • ISSUE 3. Revised methane emission methodology: • EPA is correct in questioning prior estimates • Methane emissions not a direct function of VS excretion. • Develop & validate CH4 model based on operational factors—management, treatment, climate, etc.

  6. EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY • ISSUE 4. Revision of boundary conditions • Off-site transfers of manure. • Response: • BMP’s exist to mitigate emissions on or off-site. • Chronic vs. acute emissions—frequency & duration of application.

  7. EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY • ISSUE 5. Monetization of emissions control (quantifying benefits). • Economics vs. health effects issue. • Response: • Exposure studies lacking. • Community/neighbor validation. • Implementation costs—new vs. retrofit; longevity of control practices. • Sustainable livestock & poultry industries. • Limit unintended consequences

  8. EPA/ELG/NODA—AIR QUALITY • ISSUE 6. Conjunctive Multi-Media Protection. • Response: • Research, development, technology transfer needs: • Air-shed scale vs.localized/site-specific situations. • Appropriate models based on appropriate criteria. • Interagency cooperation • Statement regarding air quality requirements in ELG’s should be retained. • Not ready for regulatory action

  9. Research & Development Needs: --Odor/odorant/PM-- • Emission characterization— • Emission rates, Flux, Emission factors. • Specific to: species, facility type, manure/wastewater system components, climate, soils. • Variability—diurnal, seasonal, climatic, management practices. • Secondary PM, from NH3, NOx, etc. • Chemical & biological markers.

  10. Research & Development Needs: Odor/odorant/PM • Control Practices: • Kinetic release mechanisms • Relationships among: odor, odorants, particulates • Cost-effective control technologies • Innovative air treatment processes—exhausts, surface-treatment, etc. • Science-based dispersion models—appropriate to CAFOs & and ground level sources.

  11. Research & Development Needs: • Public health concerns: • Appropriate health indicators— • Odor, odorants, PM • Field validation • Acceptability criteria • Dose-response relationships • Mitigation strategies -- address validated health & exposure concerns.

  12. Controlling Odor, PM, & Ammonia • Holistic Systems approaches needed: • Whole farm management • Species –specific technology • Site/source-specific –tailored • Contaminant-specific—odor,PM, NH3 • Conjunctive management, Water & Air • Reducing NH3 losses • CNMP approach

  13. Research & Development Needs Technology Transfer • Develop interagency programs--research, education, technology transfer, technical & financial assistance. • Evaluate innovative control technologies. • Deliver cost-effective mitigation technologies to CAFO producers!

  14. U.S. Program Needs: Air Contaminants • Conjunctive policies, multimedia protection: • Air quality • Water quality • Global atmospheric considerations. • Integrated interagency programs: • Interagency programs • Research, education, tech.transfer, tech. & financial assist. • Linked, Coordinated • Example-- 1990 President’s/USDA-Water Quality Initiative • Adequate funding commitment !

More Related