1 / 27

Trade policy analysis: choosing the appropriate methodology

Trade policy analysis: choosing the appropriate methodology. Marc Bacchetta ERSD/WTO. Outline. Research based policy making Criteria for choosing a methodology Key methodologies Modelling assumptions Required resources. Research based policy making.

Télécharger la présentation

Trade policy analysis: choosing the appropriate methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Trade policy analysis: choosing the appropriate methodology Marc Bacchetta ERSD/WTO

  2. Outline • Research based policy making • Criteria for choosing a methodology • Key methodologies • Modelling assumptions • Required resources

  3. Research based policy making • Research based information on policies is needed at different stages of the policy making process • Proposal • Policy dialogue with stakeholders • Implementation

  4. Dialogue • Dialogue between researchers and policy stakeholders is crucial • Researchers may help policy makers specify questions • Researchers should guide the choice of appropriate methodologies

  5. Methodology: the question • Which approach is best suited to answer the question at stake given existing constraints ?

  6. Choice of methodology is not necessarily straightforward • The question should dictate the choice of a methodology ... • But there are various constraints: • Time and resources • Sunk costs (incl. familiarity with certain methodologies, institutional constraints) • Fashion

  7. Key approaches • Descriptive statistics • Modelling approaches: • Ex ante vs ex post approaches • Econometric vs simulation models • Partial vs general equilibrium

  8. Ex ante vs ex post approaches • Ex ante simulation involves projecting the effects of a policy change on a set of economic variables of interest • Can answer “what if” questions • Ex post approaches use historical data to conduct an analysis of the effects of past trade policy • Can answer “what if” questions if estimated parameters are used for simulation (which assumes that past relations continue to be relevant)

  9. Econometric vs simulation models • In econometric models, parameter values are estimated using statistical techniques • Parameter values come with confidence intervals • Parameter estimation is resource intensive • Results are specific to one country or group of countries • In simulation models, parameters are typically drawn from a variety of sources and some are calibrated

  10. Descriptive statistics (1) • Trade flows analysis • Example: assessment of trade patterns and/or trade performance • Conceptual tools • Revealed comparative advantage, intra-industry trade, export diversification, etc. • Empirical tools • Entropy indices, revealed comparative adv.

  11. Trade performance and competitiveness assessment • Trade in services • Merchandise trade • Trade performance • Growth and pattern in the direction of trade • Composition of trade • Export concentration and principal products • Competitiveness, specialization and complementarity • International competitiveness of exports • Export specialization • Trade complementarity and intensity • ...

  12. Indices • Export specialization index • Trade complementarity index • with

  13. Descriptive statistics (2) • Trade policy analysis • Example: trade policy assessment • Conceptual tools • Effective protection, non tariff barriers, bound and applied tariffs, tariff escalation, etc. • Empirical tools • Averages, dispersion indices, coverage ratios, etc.

  14. Trade policy assessments • Trade policy reviews • Trade and investment regime • Trade policies by measure and by sector • Tariff profiles • NAMA tariff simulations

  15. Econometric estimation of gravity equations • Can be used to study the impact of trade policy variables on trade flows • Example: effect of regional trade agreement • Ex post: not well suited for making predictions • No welfare effects

  16. Econometric estimation of gravity equations • Reasonable data requirements • Reasonable entry costs • Cost of econometric software package ? • Importance of integrating theory with estimation

  17. Econometric estimation of economic consequences of trade • Example: assessment of the distributional effects of trade policy • Ex post • Variable level of econometric sophistication • Variable data requirements

  18. Partial equilibrium simulations • Focuses on a specific market or product and ignores interactions with other markets • Best suited for the analysis of sectoral policies, or when interactions with other markets are expected to be limited • Allows to include more market relevant details than GE models • Ex: assessing the welfare effect of a reduction of the tariff on wheat

  19. Partial equilibrium simulations • A number of partial equilibrium models have been developed to simulate international trade policy changes • Those include SMART, ATPSM, SWOPSIM • Data requirements are manageable • Elasticities are crucial

  20. General equilibrium simulations • GE explicitly accounts for all the links between sectors of an economy – households, firms, governments and the rest of the world • Imposes constraints s.t. income equals expenditure • Trade off between detail and breadth of coverage • Assesses effects of policy changes on aggregate and sectoral variables, including: • Income, production, employment, relative factor and product prices, etc.

  21. General equilibrium simulations • Single or multiple country models • Highly intensive in data and parameters • SAM, behavioural parameters, elasticities • GTAP provides data and a simple model • Entry cost is significant • High risk of misinterpretation

  22. Paper on Turkey • Glenn Harrison, Thomas Rutherford and David Tarr (2003) “Trade Liberalization, poverty and Efficient Equity,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 71 (1), June 2003, 97-128. •  Policy application—joining a Customs Union with the European Union (not membership). •  Small Open Economy model with 40 households, 20 rural and 20 urban. •  Economic Theory suggests that for developing countries trade liberalization should shift production toward labor intensive products. That should be pro-poor.

  23. In Turkey the authors did not find this. They estimated that the poor lost. Why? • They show that estimation of factor intensities is crucial to a sensible link between trade policy and poverty analysis. • Input-Output tables notoriously fail to accurately report factor intensities. Capital’s share is a residual. In Agriculture, labor’s earnings are underreported, so it is the most capital intensive sector in IO tables. Services sectors are also problematical. •  In Turkey locomotives are reported as 100% labor; textiles are capital intensive.

  24. Perverse results may be obtained if estimates are based on IO table factor intensities. The lesson learned for future applications is that factor intensities should be estimated outside of the input-output model. • The authors caution consumers of these models to ask producers how they have obtained the values of their factor intensities. • The study identifies sectors where an increase in the tariff rates will increase the welfare of the poor. The authors caution, however, that political economy reasons suggest that these models should not be used for industrial policy to help the poor. Likely to be abused like the many other arguments to depart from tariff uniformity.

  25. Partial vs general equilibrium models

  26. Conflicting results • Policy makers don’t like conflicting results • In most cases different results reflect different assumptions • Such differences are difficult to avoid • What matters is the presentation of the results

  27. References • Piermartini, R. and R. Teh (2005) Demystifying modelling methods for trade policy, WTO Discussion Paper No. 10 • Bowen, H.P., A. Hollander and J.-M. Viaene (1998) Applied international trade analysis, University of Michigan Press • Abler, D. (2006) Approaches to measuring the effects of trade agreements, CATPRN Paper 2006-1

More Related