SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Graduation Report District Data June 2012

chase-lyons avatar
chase-lyons
19 diapositives · 355 Views · Nov 06, 2014

Graduation Report District Data June 2012. Kenmore-Town of Tonawanda UFSD September 11, 2012. 3 Year Trend Graduation Rates. Current Seniors as of June Includes KE, KW, ALP, OSP, Out of District SWD Not Cohort as reported to SED. N= 560/671. N= 561/629. N= 570/649.

Graduation Report District Data June 2012 - slide 1
01 / 19Graduation Report District Data June 2012
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Graduation Report District Data June 2012
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Graduation Report District DataJune 2012 Kenmore-Town of Tonawanda UFSD September 11, 2012

  2. 3 Year Trend Graduation Rates • Current Seniors as of June • Includes KE, KW, ALP, OSP, Out of District SWD • Not Cohort as reported to SED N= 560/671 N= 561/629 N= 570/649

  3. 3 Year GED and Drop-Out Data • Research: • History of academic failure • Retained 2 or more times • Frequent discipline referrals • Excessive absenteeism

  4. Grade 12 Course Requirement Not Achieved • Students who failed to meet course requirements to graduate • Percentages include students who failed multiple courses

  5. Diploma Types • Represents breakdown of June diplomas • Phase-out of local diploma for general education students • General education Freshman entering 9/08 – only Regents diploma

  6. ELA Regents • 2010-11 was the first administration of the shortened Regents exam • Our results have fluctuated due to shift to CCLS • SWD achievement has dropped a little with approximately 56% passing with a 65-100

  7. Integrated Algebra Regents • District Results • Includes Middle School students • 100% of Middle School students passed • SWD achievement has remained relatively stable N=599 N=671

  8. Geometry Regents • Third administration this year • SWD passing (65% - 100%) continues to fluctuate from year to year dependent upon numbers and types of students N=558 N=456 N=524

  9. Algebra 2/Trig Regents • Second June administration this year • Our results continue to reflect state achievement • There were SWD who sat for this exam – results varied N=375 N=315

  10. Global Studies Regents • Relatively consistent achievement rates • SWD passing rates continue to rise N=615 N=598 N=631

  11. US History Regents • Yearly fluctuations in performance for both General Ed and SWD N=619 N=562 N=556

  12. Earth Science Regents • This year includes both HS and MS students (4th year) • Almost 100% of Middle School students passed • Percentage of SWD passing increased by 10% N=628 N=648 N=627

  13. Living Environment Regents • Percentage of General Ed passing remains relatively constant • SWD percentage passing fluctuates slightly from year to year N=615 N=572 N=578

  14. Chemistry Regents • Percent passing continues to rise N=372 N=368 N=260

  15. Physics Regents • Results continue to fluctuate from year to year, depending upon the test difficulty and number of students enrolled N=68 N=46 N=63

  16. 5 Year AP Trend • Scores of 3, 4, 5 are generally accepted at many colleges • 530 (54%) out of 981 exams taken achieved 3, 4, or 5 • Encourage students to enroll in AP – more challenging coursework

  17. On-Going Initiatives Related to Graduation Rates and Regents • Instructional Improvement Plan refinement • Data Teams/LASW • Formative assessments • Curriculum mapping continuation/refinement • Co-Teaching • Learning Center • NovaNet

  18. Next Steps • Develop DCIP as a Focus District • Develop SCEP for two High Schools • Continue to align ELA and Math to the CCLS • Continue to align the rest of subject areas to CCLS – Literacy Across the Disciplines • Continue development of CTE through Perkins Grant (4th Program Application)

  19. Next Steps Cont’d • Continue to refine IB in both High Schools • Monitor the first year of the Big Picture Program • Refine and investigate new ways to track student achievement data • Integrate SLO discussions