1 / 14

Mariner Speech and Debate Club

Mariner Speech and Debate Club. Meeting #3 Tuesday, October 23, 2012. Affirmative and Negative Team Responsibilities. Affirmative Team- WE WANT CHANGE! Prove that change is needed Provide a workable plan to create change to make things better Negative Team- NO CHANGE- STATUS QUO

chika
Télécharger la présentation

Mariner Speech and Debate Club

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mariner Speech and Debate Club Meeting #3 Tuesday, October 23, 2012

  2. Affirmative and Negative Team Responsibilities • Affirmative Team- WE WANT CHANGE! • Prove that change is needed • Provide a workable plan to create change to make things better • Negative Team- NO CHANGE- STATUS QUO • Attack the affirmative team’s case with clash and counterarguments • Show benefits of the status quo • Each speaker will have between 3-5 minutes- this is NOT a lot of time…time flies by when you are in front of the podium.

  3. Speak Responsibilities- 1A • 1st Affirmative speaker • Introduce self and team members • Clearly state the topic • Define terms • Tell the judges what the main points of your case will be (what you intend to prove)

  4. Speaker Responsibilities- 1N • 1st Negative Speaker • Introduce self and team members to audience • Clearly state your opinion to the topic • Tell the judges what you main point will be

  5. Speaker Responsibilities- 2A • 2nd Affirmative speaker • Responds to Negative team’s remarks • Attacks the Negative team’s main points • Presents evidence to prove your team’s 1st main point. • Restates your team’s position

  6. Speaker Responsibilities- 2N • 2nd Negative speaker • Responds to Affirmative team’s remarks • Attacks the Affirmative team’s main points • Presents evidence to prove your team’s 1st main point. • Restates your team’s position

  7. Speaker Responsibilities- 3A • 3rd Affirmative speaker • Responds to Negative team’s remarks • Attacks the Negative team’s main points • Presents evidence to prove your team’s 2nd main point. • Restates your team’s position

  8. Speaker Responsibilities- 3N • 3rd Negative speaker • Responds to Affirmative team’s remarks • Attacks the Affirmative team’s main points • Presents evidence to prove your team’s 2nd main point. • Restates your team’s position

  9. Speaker Responsibilities- 4A • 4th Affirmative speaker • Responds to Negative team’s remarks • Attacks the Negative team’s main points • Presents evidence to prove your team’s 3rd main point (final point). • Restates your team’s position

  10. Speaker Responsibilities- 4N • 4th Negative speaker • Responds to Affirmative team’s remarks • Attacks the Affirmative team’s main points • Presents evidence to prove your team’s 3rd main point (final point). • Restates your team’s position

  11. NEGATIVE BLOCK! • Negative block is when the negative team goes back to back- this takes place with the 4th negative speaker and 5th negative speaker • Remember…burden of proof, where it allows for the affirmative team to start and end the debate.

  12. Speaker Responsibilities- 5N • 5thNegative speaker • Reviews the entire debate and explains the main reasons why the negative team should win the debate.

  13. Speaker Responsibilities- 5A • 5th Affirmative Speaker • Restate your team’s main points that were argued throughout the debate • Respond to the main points that the last two negative speakers discussed • Explain the main reasons why the affirmative team should win the debate.

  14. Judging a Debate • Judges base their decision on • Quality of evidence presented • Persuasive appeal • Overall team effort

More Related