200 likes | 334 Vues
This document provides an overview of the ITER Computational Shield Benchmark conducted from October 31 to November 2, 2007, during the IAEA Technical Meeting in Vienna. The benchmark assesses the performance of the revised nuclear data library, FENDL-2.1, against its predecessor, FENDL-2.0. The analysis includes neutron and photon fluxes, helium and hydrogen production in stainless steel, and validation of computational methodologies for ITER applications. The results highlight marginal differences in calculated neutron fluxes, particularly in deep penetration areas of the TF coil.
E N D
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft EFF-DOC-975 ITER Computational Shield Benchmark U. Fischer, A. Serikov Association FZK-Euratom Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IAEA TM on Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices. Vienna, October 31 – November 2, 2007
Background • FENDL-2.1 • Revision to FENDL-2.0 (1995/96) • Compiled November 2003, see report INDC(NDS)-451 • Working libraries prepared by IAEA/NDS, see INDC(NDS)-467 (2004) • New reference data library for ITER neutronics calculations • ITER nuclear analyses service – enabling activities (CAD – MCNP benchmark) • QA specification document for ITER neutronic analyses • Need for • Qualification benchmark analyses • Validation fusion benchmark experiments • Start with computational benchmark typical for ITER applications U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
ITER Computational Shield Benchmark • ITER 1D blanket/shield/VV/TF-coil configuration • Set up as part of the FENDL-1 benchmarking efforts Reference: M. Sawan, FENDL Neutronics Benchmark: Specifications for the calculational and shielding benchmark, INDC(NDS)-316, December 1994 • Applied for benchmarking of FENDL-1.0 multigroup data against ENDF/B-V data using ONEDANT discrete ordinates code Reference: M. Sawan, Results of the neutronics and shielding calculational benchmark, IAEA Advisory Group Meeting on Completion of FENDL-1, Del Mar, CA, December 5-9, 1995 • Suitable computational benchmark for ITER neutronics calculations • Benchmarking of FENDL-2.1 vs. FENDL-2.0 and –1.0 (MC data) • No benchmark results available for FENDL-1.0/2.0 MC data • Need to re-run benchmark for those data too! U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
FENDL Data Evaluations U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
FENDL-2.1 Original Data Sources U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
ITER Computational Shield Benchmark Vertical cross-section Horizontal cross-section U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
ITER Computational Shield Benchmark Inboard radial build U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Total neutron fluxes U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Total neutron flux profile (FENDL-2.1) U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Total neutron flux profiles: FENDL-2.1 vs. 2.0 Relative difference (F2.1 – F2.0)/F2.1 100 U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Neutron flux spectra: FENDL-2.1 vs. 2.0 Relative difference (F2.1 – F2.0)/F2.1 U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Total photon flux profiles: FENDL-2.1 vs. 2.0 Relative difference (F2.1 – F2.0)/F2.1 U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Outboard nuclear heating profile: FENDL-2.1 vs. 2.0 Relative difference (F2.1 – F2.0)/F2.1 U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Helium production in SS-316 (FENDL-2.1) Total and elemental decomposition Ni U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Helium production in SS-316: FENDL-2.1 vs. 2.0 Relative differences (F2.1 – F2.0)/F2.1 Ni U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Helium production cross-sections of Fe FENDL-2.0 vs. 2.1 FENDL-2.0 FENDL-2.1 U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Hydrogen production in SS-316: FENDL-2.0 vs. 2.1 Relative differences (F2.1 – F2.0)/F2.1 U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Hydrogen production cross-sections of Fe FENDL-2.1 vs. 2.0 FENDL-2.1 FENDL-2.0 (total) U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Hydrogen production cross-sections of Fe FENDL-2.0: total vs. partials (n,p) total (n,n’p) U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007
Conclusions • FENDL-2.1 vs. 2.0 • No significant differences of calculated neutron fluxes except for region of TF coil (deep penetration) where FENDL-2.1 results are 10-12 % higher. • Similar trend is observed for photon fluxes and nuclear heating. • Significant discrepancies found for He and H production data • FENDL-2.0 total gas production cross-sections not reliable, use partials • FENDL-2.1 total gas production cross-sections consistent with partials • Differences in He production data severe, indication of deficient cross-sections in FENDL-2.0 • Differences in hydrogen production correspond to differences in neutron fluxes (using partial production cross-sections) • Experimental validation of gas production data required ! U. Fischer, A. Serikov, ITER computational shield benchmark - IAEA TM, Vienna, October 31- November 2, 2007