1 / 17

Problem definition and Analysis

Problem definition and Analysis. Scope. Define what to study (and what not). Too much = wasted work!. Key object classes (order, delivery, ...) and actions. Actions cause state change of objects. Necessary for understanding and modeling. Performance indicators

chogan
Télécharger la présentation

Problem definition and Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Problem definitionand Analysis

  2. Scope Define what to study (and what not). Too much = wasted work! Key object classes (order, delivery, ...) and actions. Actions cause state change of objects. Necessary for understanding and modeling. Performance indicators (system time, resource occupation, cost, ...) Problems to be addressed Solution alternatives Account for expected future developments

  3. Objects and actions Objects have a life cycle, consisting of states. For example, for the passport case, citizen and civil servant objects do matter. A citizen can be in various states: e.g. not involved, entered, being judged, being instructed, away for 2nd photo, back, being helped, finished. Servant's states: idle, judging, instructing, processing. Passport actions? Ferry objects and actions?

  4. Performance indicators Passport case: average lead time, standard deviation. maximum queue size (facilities). occupation rate of civil servant. Ferry case? Average lead time and standard deviation for A to B and for B to A cars.

  5. Problems and solutions Passport case: Long queues (possibly, depending on demand) Solutions: approve more, skip judgement, appointment system Ferry case? Which new ferry to buy Consider future developments extrapolate trends beware special circumstances!

  6. Analysis Parameters: - maximal capacity of key resource(s) - r : arrival intensity divided by capacity (both measured in nr of cases per time unit) Capacity and intensity can be estimated or assumed. Analyze extreme cases: - small r - r almost 1

  7. Passport problem case: citizen needing document resource: civil servant performance measured by system time (wait time + service time). Problem: long queues. Proposed solutions: - less strict judgement - oblige photo from preferred shop

  8. Passport analysis Analyze extreme cases. Passport/photo example: acceptratio a, with 0 < a < 1 average time to instruct photo remake: t average time to create document: u Average resource time needed for client: u+a.t (= waiting time in absence of queues) Average influx r clients per u + a.ttime units. r ≥1: not enough resource capacity; infinite waiting time. Assuming M/M/1 queue (appendix F), we obtain an average service time of (u + a.t)/ (1-r).

  9. M/M/1 passport queue time / (u + a.t )

  10. Passport case Simulation needed? Can you think of additional constraints that preclude the problem's analysis? Proposed solutions: - less strict judgement - oblige photo from preferred shop - introduce an appointment system Give comment on proposals Beware of tunnel vision!

  11. Ferry problem case: car needing to cross resource: ferry performance measured by system time (wait time + service time). Problem: new ferry needed Proposed alternatives: - faster, less cars - slower, more cars

  12. Ferry analysis Ferry example: cycle time: c; up to n≥10 places per cycle (batch size) capacity: n/c cars per time unit Input: r (n/c) cars per time unit; r <1. Minimum average waiting time c/2. Processing: fixed timec/2. Low influx (e.g. r≤ 0.3): negligible probability of more than n waiting cars. average system timec + e.

  13. Ferry queue time / c r

  14. Two ferries are proposed. For ferry 1, cycle time c equals 6 minutes, n equals 10. For ferry 2, cequals 8 minutes and n equals 15. systime ferry 2 systime ferry 1 system time (minutes) intensity (cars per minute)

  15. Standard deviation important for traffic studies. measured times: 5,11,13, 7,14; average: 10 measured times: 8,11,10, 9,12; average: 10 How do the two ferries compare w.r.t. stdev?

  16. Ferry case Simulation needed? M/D/1 queue with batches extra time for getting on/off Give essential characteristics. Choice between alternatives depends on traffic intensity. Increase expected? Decision based on mean throughput time m and standard deviation s. For only plm. 15% of cases, throughput time exceeds m+s.

  17. Classwork/Homework Classwork: Exercises on page 6 and 10 of lecture notes. Analyze DCT case, pose additional questions, propose strategies. Homework: Study chapter 3 and appendix F of lecture notes. Special attention to Little's formula and M/M/1. Assignment (individual, discussions encouraged): Write DCT report (2 pags A4), defining concepts pertaining to the case. Indicate a few promising solution strategies. (give evidence by analysis) Mail to m.voorhoeve@tue.nl

More Related