1 / 22

Leading Edge Thinking in Education & Learning Theory: Its Application in Developmental Supervision

Leading Edge Thinking in Education & Learning Theory: Its Application in Developmental Supervision. Rev. Dr. Michelle Oberwise Lacock Aurora Health Care Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

chung
Télécharger la présentation

Leading Edge Thinking in Education & Learning Theory: Its Application in Developmental Supervision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Leading Edge Thinking in Education & Learning Theory: Its Application in Developmental Supervision Rev. Dr. Michelle Oberwise Lacock Aurora Health Care Milwaukee, Wisconsin

  2. Glickman, Carl D., Stephen P. Gordon, and Jovita M. Ross-Gordon. SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2010.

  3. Paradigm Shift • Collegial supervision is the province for the Training Supervisor and SES • Reflective inquiry and professional dialogue • Knowledge of Self, Beliefs and Educational Philosophy • Culturally Responsive • Integration of Adult learning and adult development • Variety of tools

  4. Developmental Supervision • What is it? Kno Knowledge Interpersonal Skills Technical Skills

  5. Supervisor’s task:

  6. Educational Philosophies: Essentialism Idealism – Absolutes Realism – Natural Laws • Supervisory process: • Teaches truths about supervising. • Knowledgeable about absolute standards. • SES digest truths = good supervisors

  7. Educational Philosophies Experimentalism • Reliance on the scientific method • Humans create their own laws, principles and machines, which are based on reality and morality. • Knowledge is interaction between scientific person and environment • Supervisory process: • Supervisor conveys knowledge • Guides trial and error / exploratory learning • SES learns about truths of their times • SES experiments and grows continually

  8. Educational Philosophies Existentialism Only looking within oneself to discern truth Human dignity and worth = truth Human beings hold capacity to form own destiny • Supervisory process: • Supervisor full commitment to SES choice • Supervisor provides the environment to explore mental capabilities & protect the SES’ right to discover • Supervisor does not dispense information, they are facilitators • SES must learn for oneself through self-discovery and make decisions

  9. Where you Stand depends on where you Sit • Location (historical context) • Dominant/Minority cultures • Cultural assumptions • Culturally responsive • Ethnocentric • denial, defense, minimization • Ethnorelative • acceptance, adaptation, integration

  10. Supervisor’s Strategies • Nondirective Interpersonal Approach • Collaborative Interpersonal Approach • Directive Informational Interpersonal Approach • Directive Control Interpersonal Approach

  11. Supervisory Behavior Continuum

  12. Outcomes of Personal Conference ApproachOutcome • Nondirective SES self plan • Collaborative Mutual Plan • Directive Informational Training Supervisor suggested plan • Directive Control Training Supervisor assigned plan

  13. Use of Directive Control Ideally only used for a short duration when… • SES at very low developmental levels • SES does not have awareness, knowledge or inclination to act • A task/decision does not concern the SES • In an emergency to stabilize unstable situation

  14. Use of Directive Informational • SES at fairly low developmental levels • SES does not possess knowledge about an issue • SES feels confused, inexperienced, or at a loss • When time is short, constraints clear, and quick, concrete action required

  15. Use of Collaborative Behaviors To be used when both SES & Supervisor: • Have similar expertise • Both responsible for carrying out a decision • Commit to solving a problem Also used when SES is functioning at moderate or mixed developmental levels

  16. Use of Nondirective Behaviors • SES functioning at high developmental levels • SES possesses most of the knowledge/expertise about an issue • SES has full responsibility for carrying out decision • SES is committed to solving a problem and the outcome does not impact Supervisor

  17. Applying Developmental Supervsion • The long term goal of developmental supervision • Supervisory student development toward a point where the SES, facilitated by supervisors can assume full responsibility for instructional improvement of themselves and the students they are supervising. • Purpose, hope, growth and development for all of our students

  18. Case 1 • An SES is co-supervising a group of extended students with you • Conflict begins to arise between SES (Roman Catholic) and one of the students who is Buddhist. • Emotions are rising, and the SES is becoming more frustrated and begins to use profanity in the conflict. The expression on the students face is a mixture of anger, surprise and hurt. What approach would you use?

  19. Case 2 • An SES (female from a country outside the US where English is not their first language) has submitted theory papers and the three papers did not pass. The supervisor is ethnic male from the US). • It has been a year and many short drafts have been written and no real progress has been made. What approach would you use?

More Related