1 / 18

Western IPM Center – Projects and Directions

Western IPM Center – Projects and Directions. Rick Melnicoe Director, Western IPM Center. Vision Statement. The Center is a partnership of stakeholders that will facilitate integrated pest management for the region. Mission Statement.

clark
Télécharger la présentation

Western IPM Center – Projects and Directions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Western IPM Center – Projects and Directions Rick Melnicoe Director, Western IPM Center

  2. Vision Statement The Center is a partnership of stakeholders that will facilitate integrated pest management for the region.

  3. Mission Statement The Western Region Integrated Pest Management Center will work with stakeholders to create collaborative relationships that identify and address critical pest management needs that are responsive to economic, environment and human health and safety concerns.

  4. Western IPM Center Organization USDA Stakeholders Co-Director. & AA to WCC-069 Center Director Advisory Committee Asst. Director Steering Committee Work Groups Networks Comment Coordinators PMSP Coordinators Regional IPM Grant Panel Mgr. Writer

  5. *Steve Balling, Del Monte Foods Sue Blodgett, Montana State Univ. Barry Brennan, Univ. of Hawaii Carrie Foss, Washington St. Univ. *Mike Harrington, WAAESD *Linda Herbst, Univ. of California *Tom Holtzer, Colorado St. Univ. Steve Hopkins, USEPA Paul Jepson, Oregon St. Univ. Jack Lloyd, Univ. of Wyoming *Rick Melnicoe, Univ. of California *Jennifer Miller, NW Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides Laura Quakenbush, Colorado Dept. of Agriculture *Phil Rasmussen, WSARE Becky Sisco, Western Region IR-4 Carla Thomas, WPDN Doug Walsh, WCC-69 Ex Officio Members Mike Fitzner, USDA-CSREES Wilfred Burr, USDA-OPMP *Steering Committee members Advisory Committee

  6. Non-Land Grant APHIS Tribal Government NGO – The Nature Conservatory? Crop Protection Industry Crop Consultant Urban Consultant Minor Crop - 2 Major Crop Additional Advisory Committee Membership (to be filled)

  7. Programs • Work Groups • Information Networks • Emerging/Critical Issues • RFP • Special funds • Pest Management Strategic Plans • Crop Profiles (mostly updates)

  8. Crop Insect Losses and Impact Assessment Working Group Principal Investigator: Peter Ellsworth, Arizona Objectives: In collaboration with scientists and stakeholders initially throughout the low desert areas of AZ and southern CA, we will serve as the forum for discussion and development of crop insect loss and impact assessment in key economic crops of this region starting first with cotton, leafy vegetables, and melons. We will periodically assemble diverse sources of information and perspective in the evaluation of crop losses and the associated causes and underlying costs. Outcomes: Detailed assessments of the role of insects and insecticides in the production of cotton, melons and leafy vegetables (key low desert crops). Economists, entomologists, other pest managers, regulators, policy-makers, and other state, regional and Federal interests will have ready access to a set of data that pareses out not only what is “sprayed” on crops, but also what the “intent” or target of those sprays and other pest management inputs. We will be able to provide any interested parties specific information about crop loss and how it is associated with specific insects and other factors. This should help to guide new and existing research, implementation and outreach efforts in IPM.

  9. PNW Workgroup Meeting Coordinator and 2003 – 2004 Summary Impacts & Achievements Report Principal Investigator: Tom Jahns, Alaska Objectives: Collaborate regionally with other state PI’s (AK, ID, OR, WA, MT and UT) to develop intra/interstate crop profiles, pest management strategic plans, rank and prioritization of emerging issues and the development of regional publications. Coordinate three meetings a year to encourage continued collaboration among these states in the western region and participate in “Alignment to the IPM Roadmap” development projects developed by other regional PIs. Outcomes: Collaborative meetings between regional PI’s will lead to priority setting and future project assignments and collaborations for the region in support of the WIPM Center objectives. A report will be submitted detailing the activities and priorities of this workgroup annually.

  10. Regional Work group on IPM Consequences of Herbicide Tolerant & Insect Resistant (HTIR) Crops Principal Investigator: Patrick Byrne, Colorado Objectives: To organize a work group of Western agricultural professionals in the areas of herbicide tolerant and/or insect resistant crops and initiate a series of video conferences for the work group in late spring 2004. a set of priorities will be developed for research and information needs and a strategy for addressing them. We will develop a prototype web site that will provide coordinated access to HTIR information resources. Outcomes: This effort will improve communication and collaboration within the region among workers concerned with HTIR crops. A prototype web site providing access to information resources will be developed. A plan will be developed that will identify priority information needs for Western HTIR crops, and a strategy for addressing those needs.

  11. Incorporation of IPM Guidelines in NRCS Conservation Planning Principal Investigator: Ronda Hirnyck Objectives: Facilitate a team of pest management experts to design a methodology and process for collaborating with NRCS. Identify or design a process/system for incorporating IPM guidelines into NRCS Conservation plans. Identify additional funding sources to build an IPM Planner that would satisfy NRCS planning requirements. Facilitate relationships with multiple government agencies to promote collaboration and reduce duplication of effort. Outcomes: The workgroup will recommend an NRCS process and system which incorporates IPM guidelines into NRCS Conservation plans.

  12. Working Group for Curly Top Virus Biology, Transmission, Ecology and Management Principal Investigator: Rebecca Creamer, New Mexico Objectives: Assemble a working group which will include university, government, extension and commodity-based individuals to assess the current status of curly top and set priorities for research on beet curly top virus. Organize research on beet curly top virus genetics in the western United States. Organize research to assess the genetics and biology of populations of the beet leafhopper vector, Circulifer tenellus within the western U.S., to study the role of weed hosts, and to examine strategies for managing curly top. Outcomes: This is a two-year proposal with one work group meeting per year. At the initial meeting, the status of the research will be assessed and priorities for needed research into curly top virus will be identified. An action plan will be developed to determine which components of the group will accomplish which aspects of the needed work. The group will decide who will work together to seek funding for the top priority research. It is expected that preliminary research will be coordinated to obtain information needed to secure grant funding. During the second year it is expected that the group will have secured funding for the top priorities and have developed sufficient preliminary information to seek funding for other aspects of curly top research.

  13. Climatic Data and Analyses for Applications in Agriculture and Natural Resources Principal Investigator: Paul Jepson, Oregon Objectives: Coordinate collection and dissemination of weather and climate data and information in the western U.S. and serve as a forum for discussion of related issues. Identify weather and climate issues and support research related to agriculture and natural resources in the West. Map climatic elements in the West over a range of scales. Promote application of weather-and climate-based products in agricultural and natural resource management. Promote access to real time climate elements and products in order to improve monitoring of natural resources issues (i.e. drought, agriculture, fire). Outcomes: Maintenance and enhancement of the Western Regional Climate Center’s integrated data base of the major climatic databases in the West. Development of a set of distributed databases that will be compatible with the goals and objectives of the Unified Climate Access network (UCAN). Coordination of issues surrounding data collection and quality control/assurance, and resulting recommendations to appropriate organizations as needed to promote and ensure useful, high-quality data sets to support agriculture and natural resource research and applications. Improved algorithms for turf water management. Support for monitoring and assessment of drought. Development and enhancement of stochastic climate models (“weather generators”), and their application in agriculture and natural resources management. Improved understanding of climate variability and its effects on agricultural and natural resources management. Identify a common format for real-time data to be exchanged (such as UCAN and SHEF). Develop a list of sources of real-time weather and climate data. Develop tools needed to be able to use climate data available on the internet from any climate network. Provide information on the WCC-102 web site.

  14. Establishment of a Small Fruits Work Group for Oregon and Washington Principal Investigator: Tom Peerbolt, Oregon Objectives: Create a Pacific Northwest Small Fruits Work Group to identify and make recommendations concerning IPM needs and resources. Identify and prioritize IPM research projects. Develop, coordinate and disseminate a funding database and elicit research proposals. Outcomes: The work group will involve all aspects of the caneberry community – growers, field men, processors and researchers and will serve as the nucleus for information gathering and dissemination concerning IPM needs and research projects for caneberries. By encouraging and supporting IPM research, the work group will enlarge the role of IPM for small fruits, which will help to ameliorate the environment. The work group will help focus IPM research and forestall duplication of effort by uniting a number of organizations and small fruits professionals, many who are already working on various aspects of IPM, for a single collaborative effort in the Pacific Northwest.

  15. The Western Regional Urban Residential and Institutional IPM Work Group Principal Investigator: Rebecca Hines, Washington Objectives: Establish a multi-state, multi-organization work group to enhance communication and collaborations regarding Urban Residential/Institutional IPM> Identify the needs and obstacles for people servicing accounts in Urban Residential/Institutional pest control to shift to an IPM practice. Identify the needs and obstacles for consumers, institutions, and businesses receiving IPM practice. Develop a regional plan, including funding, for moving toward short-term and long-term goals. Outcomes: Report findings on obstacles and needs and possible projects that might be proposed to overcome obstacles and meet needs in Urban Residential/Institutional IPM.

  16. Information Networks • Alaska Information Network – Jahns • Arid Southwest IPM Network – Ellsworth, Palumbo, Baker • Mountain West IPM Network – McDonald • Hawaii Information Network – Kawate • Idaho Information Network – Hirnyck, Bechinski • Oregon Information Network – Jenkins, Jepson • Washington State Information Network – Daniels

  17. Future Programs • Regional IPM Grants Program • Assume management in 2004/05 • Pest Management Alternatives Program • May assume management of regionally restructured program in 2004/05

  18. Directions • Identification of newly emerging issues • From stakeholders • PMSPs • Provide funding for addressing issues • Expansion of Advisory Committee • Seek additional base funding

More Related