1 / 13

PWP / LAW Book Short Comings & System Improvement

PWP / LAW Book Short Comings & System Improvement. PWP – PLAN HEADS. Zonal Rly. submits PWP proposals to Rly. Board on 12 plan heads ( Except PH – 11NL,PH-14 GC & PH-17 Comp.). Separate PWP is submitted for PH- 31 - Track Renewals.

claudia-rivera
Télécharger la présentation

PWP / LAW Book Short Comings & System Improvement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PWP / LAW Book Short Comings & System Improvement

  2. PWP – PLAN HEADS • Zonal Rly. submits PWP proposals to Rly. Board • on 12 plan heads ( Except PH – 11NL,PH-14 GC & PH-17 Comp.). • Separate PWP is submitted for PH- 31 - Track • Renewals. • Various 12 plan heads are mentioned below :-

  3. PWP – Guide lines by Rly.Board. • Rly. Board communicates Ceiling (C) (Projected- • - BG for PWP Year) to Zonal Railways. • Throw Forward (T) under various Plan Head is • calculated as mentioned below. • Throw Forward = Total cost of – Expected Exp. up • in 09-10 works in PH.to end of 08-09. • Cont…..

  4. PWP – Guide lines by Rly.Board. • Norms (N) :- For each Plan head Norms laid down • by Rly. Board is mentioned below :- • PH- 29 , 51 , 52 & 53 - 2. • PH- 32 ( Bridges ) - 5. • Other Plan heads - 3. • Margin to propose work :- Based on ceiling , • Norms and throw forward , margin to propose • work is calculated as follows:- • Margin to Propose works = N x C - T

  5. PWP Proposals - Short comings • Proposals are framed without detailed survey, • detailed drawings, design and in case of Traffic • facility works without approval of yard plans by • all deptt. (For NL,GC & DL first FLS is sancd. & after submission of • DPR Project is sancd.) • After sanctioning works, large variation in • quantities and value at the stage of preparation • of detailed estimates , requiring sanction of • detailed estimate at Railway Board’s level • causing delay. • Cont…..

  6. PWP Proposals - Short comings • Major changes in scope of work after sanction of • works specially in case of traffic facility works & • works in PH 42 (Workshop). • After sanction of works, abnormal delay in approval • of plans by various departments as initially detail • plans were not prepared.

  7. PWP Proposals - Short comings • Abnormal delay in sanction of detailed estimate • due to delay in approval of plans by all departments. • All above reasons leads to delay of more than a • year in starting execution of works.

  8. System improvement - Suggestion./Recommendations • In first year’s PWP, list of works costing Rs.2.5 Cr • and more should be approved by Railway Board • with tentative cost for detail survey , planning, • designing , preparation and approval of plans, • preparation of detailed estimate and detailed • project report. This system is already existing for NL , • DL & GC Projects , were initially survey is sanctioned • & at later stage Project is sanction. • Cont…..

  9. System improvement - Suggestion./Recommendations • In second year’s PWP after submission of • detailed project report along with survey report , • design, approved plans and estimate, Railway • Board should sanction the work finally. After • sanction of work by Railway Board, sanction of • detailed estimate should not be required so that • immediately after inclusion of work in Pink Book • Railway can go ahead with tendering process. • Work should not be sanction if margin to propose • work is negative. Sanction should be limited to • extent of available margin to propose work .

  10. System Improvement - Powers required . • After initial inclusion of works in PWP , power to engage agency for detailed survey, designing, consultancy, preparation of plans, estimate and detailed project report should be given at the level of JA Grade officer without finance vetting & without annual ceiling limit. This should be similar to power of calling quotations.

  11. LAW Book- System improvement Suggestions./Recommendations. • Traffic facility works should be included in LAW Book • after approval of Engineering Scale Plan by all • departments. List of such works should be approved • 6 months in advance of processing LAW Book. • Bridge works, should be included in LAW • only after approval of structural drawing. List of such • works should be approved 6 months in advance of • processing LAW Book.

  12. LAW Book- System improvement Suggestions./Recommendations. • Work should not be sanction if margin to • propose work is negative. Sanction should be • limited to extent of available margin to propose • work. • Number of works in LAW Book should be • limited to resources available in divisions to • complete work within 2 years of sanction.

More Related