1 / 14

SPOILER WAKEFIELDS and MECHANICAL DESIGN

SPOILER WAKEFIELDS and MECHANICAL DESIGN. Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester

cliff
Télécharger la présentation

SPOILER WAKEFIELDS and MECHANICAL DESIGN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SPOILER WAKEFIELDS and MECHANICAL DESIGN Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Manchester, 24/04/2006

  2. Outline • Motivation • Wakefield simulations 2.1 Progress for ESA tests - ESA experiment - Collimator fabrication 2.2 Wakefield studies - Gdfidl/Mafia - Merlin studies 3 Material damage - Geant4/Fluka studies - Ansys studies 4. Future plans

  3. spoiler Motivation Aim : optimal design of the ILC colimators to minimise wakefield effects • Transverse wakefields excited can lead to • emittance dilution • amplification of position jitter at the IP N.Watson 1% halo is enough to damage a thick collimator (L.Keller) • Damage near the edge is easier than in the middle of the solid volume Main goal: the collimators should be able to survive at 2 bunches at 250 GeV and 1 bunch at 500 GeV

  4. People • Birmingham: N.K.Watson (+D.Adey, M.Stockton) • CCLRC: C.Beard,G.Ellwood,J.Greenhalgh,J.O'Dell,L.Fernandez • CERN: F.Zimmermann,D.Schulte [EUROTeV] • DESY: I.Zagorodnov [EUROTeV] • Lancaster: J.Smith,A.Sopczak • Manchester: R.Barlow,A.Bungau,G.Kourevlev, A.Mercer, R.Jones • TEMF, Darmstadt: M.Kärkkäinen,W.Müller,T.Weiland [EUROTeV] • For ESA tests, working closely with • F.Jackson (CCLRC)on optics for wakefield and beam damage studies • M.Woods, P.Tenenbaum, R.Arnold, +…(SLAC)for all aspects • For evolving damage studies, L.Keller, M.Ross, M.Seidel, DESY/SLAC/… Project web: http://hepunx.rl.ac.uk/swmd/

  5. 1500mm ESA – Experimental tests Procedure:(P.Tenenbaum) - insert collimators in beam path (x mover) - move collimator vertically (y mover) - measure centroid kick to beam via BPMs - Analyse kick angle vs collimator position • Commissioning: 4-9 Jan 2006 (4 old collimators) - Successful • Physics: 24 Apr – 8 May (8 new collimators – CCLRC) • People: N. Watson, J. Smith, C.Beard, L. Fernandez, A.Sopczak, F.Jackson Next run : 3 – 17 Jul 2006

  6. ESA View upstream from 3BPM9-11 View downstream from 3C2

  7. ESA View downstream from the 3WS2 3BPM 3-5

  8. ESA – the collimators • Collimators made at RAL (J.Greenhalg, J. O’Dell) • The full set of collimators is at SLAC (four of • these are in the sandwich box, second • sandwich yet to be prepared) • Carry out a swap of the sandwiches at the • beamline -> measurements with 8 collimators • within 2 weeks is a big step forward • Commissioning run starts on 24 April

  9. Wakefields – Gdfidl / Mafia (J.Smith - Lancaster, C. Beard -Astec) • Gdfidl/Mafia simulationsof longitudinal wakes are in acceptable agreement ( Cho’s results (EPAC paper) – still to be understood; result of assumed symmetry ?) • Performed comparison with ABCI for very simple configurations (pillbox cavity as test, with varying bunch length) • + R.Jones (expertise in this field area) However • Short timescale for getting results to compare with test data at SLAC, even shorter for prediction of kicks

  10. Wakefields in Merlin The Existing Code: • Wakefield formalism implemented in Merlin • Wakefield effects previously studied by R.Barlow, G. Kourevlev, A. Mercer • SLAC tests were simulated -> good agreement with the data when higher order modes are included • But : the wakepotential – the same for all accelerator components

  11. Wakefields in Merlin r’, θ’ Changes and Additions to the Code: Cm = ∑ r’m cos (mθ’) Sm = ∑ r’m sin (mθ’) wL = ∑ W’m (s) rm [Cm cos (mθ) – Sm sin (mθ)] wX = ∑ mWm (s) rm-1 {Cm cos [(m-1)θ] – Sm sin[ (m-1)θ]} wY = ∑ mWm (s) rm-1 {Sm cos [(m-1)θ] – Cm sin[ (m-1)θ]} • define new derived classes : SpoilerWakeProcess (Cm, Sm), WakePotentials (aperture information), SpoilerWakePotentials (longitudinal and transverse wakes) • Work currently ongoing (A.Bungau, R.Barlow) s z r, θ

  12. Material Damage – Geant4 /Fluka Simulate energy deposits (Fluka – L.Fernandez, Geant4 – A.Bungau) ->instantaneous T rise Beam profile as in ILC FF9 optics at SP2/4 locations Various spoiler design considered (solid material/combination of two materials) Results passed on for transient state studies • Discussions started with • L.Keller (Nov 2005) • Agreement between three • codes: EGS/Fluka/Geant4 0.6 Xo of Ti alloy leading taper (gold), graphite (blue), 1 mm thick layer of Ti alloy 0.3 Xo of Ti alloy each side, central graphite part (blue). [L.Fernandez, ASTeC] A.Bungau (Manchester)

  13. Material Damage - ANSYS • Study of steady/transient state heating effects: • used Edep from Fluka/Geant4 • good agreement between simulation • and analytic calculations • predicted the stress induced in a 3d • solid (variation with different spoiler • geometries and beam impact • locations) G. Ellwood (RAL) • Studies from beam damage compiled into a proposal • To be discussed with people from SLAC/DESY • Various EPAC’06 abstracts were submitted • EUROTeV reports submitted for review (Fluka and Geant4 studies)

  14. Future Plans • Analyse the data from the first round of tests 24/4 – 08/05 • Compare with analytic calculations and e.m. simulations • Design/build a new set of collimators to test at ESA (input also from ECHO-3D code) • Extend the damage simulations into real experimental tests with beam • Post-April 2007 : development of real collimators (not just jaws material+geometry)

More Related