SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

Collimator Wakefields

miriam avatar
miriam
31 diapositives · 444 Views · Sep 01, 2014

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of wakefield interactions in round and 3D collimators, focusing on both inductive and diffractive regimes. We discuss the numerical simulation of wakefields using tools like CST MICROWAVE STUDIO and GdfidL, alongside analytical estimates and comparisons with SLAC experimental data. Key parameters examined include the collimator length, tapering effects, and kick dependent characteristics. The findings contribute to the optimization of collimator designs for accelerators, enhancing performance for future experiments like XFEL.

Collimator Wakefields - slide 1
01 / 31Collimator Wakefields
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Collimator Wakefields
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. Collimator Wakefields Igor Zagorodnov BDGM, DESY 25.09.06

  2. ECHO CST MS ABCI MAFIA GdfidL VORPAL PBCI Tau3P K. Yokoya, CERN-SL/90-88, 1990 F.-J.Decker et al., SLAC-PUB-7261, 1996 G.V. Stupakov, SLAC-PUB-8857, 2001 P. Tenenbaum et al, PAC’01, 2001 B. Podobedov, S. Krinsky, EPAC’06, 2006 I. Zagorodnov, K.L.F. Bane, EPAC‘06, 2006 K.L.F. Bane, I.A. Zagorodnov, SLAC-PUB-11388, 2006 I. Zagorodnov et al, PAC‘03, 2003 and others References Codes Used by me

  3. Outline • Round collimators • Inductive regime • Diffractive regime • Near wall wakefields • Resistive wakefields • 3D collimators (rectangular, elliptical) • Diffractive regime • Inductive regime • Simulation of SLAC experiments • XFEL collimators • Effect of tapering and form optimization • Kick dependence on collimator length

  4. Effect of the kick

  5.  [mrad] a [mm] b [mm] l [mm] Q [nC]  [mm] Round collimator. Inductive TESLA 20 17.5 0.4 20 1. 0.3 NLC 20 17.5 0.2 20 1. 0.1 Inductive

  6. Round collimator. Inductive

  7. Round collimator. Diffractive Figure 2:Kick factor vs. collimator length. A round collimator (left), a square or rectangular collimator (s = 0.3 mm, right).

  8. Round collimator

  9. Round collimator. Resistive wall wakes Analytical estimations are available. To be studied. Can the total wake be treated as the direct sum of the geometric and the resistive wakes? Numerical modeling is required. Discrepancy between analytical estimations and measurements. Transverse geometric kick for long collimator is approx. two times larger as for the short one.

  10. 3D collimators. Regimes

  11. 3D collimators. Regimes

  12. 3D Collimators. Diffractive Regime S.Heifets and S.Kheifets, Rev Mod Phys 63,631 (1991) I. Zagorodnov, K.L.F. Bane, EPAC‘06, 2006

  13. 3D collimators. Diffractive Regime

  14. 3D collimators. Inductive Regime

  15. 3D collimators. Inductive Regime ECHO GdfidL

  16. 3D collimators. Inductive Regime ECHO GdfidL

  17. Round: 2D vs.3D Blue-3D Green-2D accurate 3D collimators. Inductive Regime

  18. 3D collimators. Inductive Regime Dipolar Quadrupolar I estimate that error in this numbers is about 5%

  19. Simulations of SLAC experiment 2001

  20. Simulations of SLAC experiment 2001

  21. XFEL collimators. Tapering Inductive When a short bunch passes by an out-transition, a significan reduction in the wake will not happen until the tapered walls cut into the cone of radiation, i.e until

  22. XFEL collimators. Tapering Geometry of the “step+taper” collimator for TTF2 Collimator geometry optimization. Optimum d ~ 4.5mm

  23. 10 / 20 mm 4.5 mm d mm 3.4 mm taper 20 mm taper (d=4.5mm) step+taper (d=4.1mm) step (d=3.4mm) XFEL collimators. Tapering Geometry of the “step+taper” absorber for XFEL

  24. Acknowledgements to K. Bane, M. Dohlus, B. Podobedov G. Stupakov, T. Weiland for helpful discussions on wakes and impedances, and to CST GmbH for letting me use CST MICROWAVE STUDIO for the meshing.