1 / 28

Approaching usability testing at your level Sit anywhere  Rice Majors University of Colorado Boulder

Approaching usability testing at your level Sit anywhere  Rice Majors University of Colorado Boulder. Rice Majors Faculty Director of Libraries Information Technology University of Colorado Boulder AMICAL Conference – April 2012 – American University of Sharjah. Today’s agenda.

clint
Télécharger la présentation

Approaching usability testing at your level Sit anywhere  Rice Majors University of Colorado Boulder

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Approaching usability testing at your levelSit anywhere Rice MajorsUniversity of Colorado Boulder Rice Majors Faculty Director of Libraries Information Technology University of Colorado Boulder AMICAL Conference – April 2012 – American University of Sharjah

  2. Today’s agenda • Why do usability testing? • Looking at some existing models & methodologies • How to get started and scale upward • Preparing for results

  3. Why would a library do usability testing? Talk in small groups & we will share

  4. Your website • For your website, usability is a necessary condition for survival • If a website is difficult to use, people leave • There's no such thing as a user reading a website manual • Paradigmatic shift from publisher-focus to user-focus • Why wouldn’t you want your web presence to be easy to use?

  5. Your intranet • For intranets, usability = employee productivity • Spending 10% of your time on usability will more than double your (Web) quality metrics • Somewhat lower return for software & physical items

  6. Purchased / subscription products • Use the data to validate purchase & subscription decisions • Use the data to help the vendor(s) make data-driven decisions about interface and experience enhancements

  7. Why I am doing user testing • Research goals – generate data to compare the user experiences of discovery tools (to help libraries and vendors) • Business goals – untangle some known challenges with our web “experience” • How do we pass a user back and forth between our website and our web-based platforms (Encore, Research Pro, various databases)? • How do we guide a user toward different paths of article discovery based on their needs (“I have a citation” vs. “I have a topic”)?

  8. Models & methodologies

  9. Some existing models • Lots of studies, more and less formal, published on the web and in articles • University of Minnesota and the usability lab • Explore issues of discovery • Assess the effectiveness of Primo (across many metrics) • University of Michigan and the guerilla testing • Compare a single set of design options • Validate a single design decision

  10. Common Methodologies • Card sorts • Open sort – design (“Sort using your own categories”) • Closed sort – validate (“Sort using the provided categories”) • Task completion – assess or validate • Find representative users • Ask the users to perform representative tasks • Observe what the users do, where they succeed, and where they have difficulties with the user interface • Shut up and let the users do the talking

  11. A “real” task I used • encore.colorado.edu • Find all recordings the library owns by The Beatles. Somehow remind yourself to look at these again later. (10 minutes) • If you need to log in, use these provided login credentials, using the Public Patron login prompt: • Last Name Testpatron • ID Number 1234567890 • PIN 0wh1ne (first digit is a zero)

  12. What was good/bad about the design of that task? Talk in small groups & we will share

  13. The good… … the bad • Beatles is a non-unique term in bibliographic data • Task probably involved using facets / refinement features • Involved understanding how formats are represented in results • (User would realize the library has recordings) • “Recordings” • FRBR • Library may have licensed content as well • More than one way to complete the task • Hard to assess whether the user would actually be reminded

  14. Getting started…

  15. Starting can be the hardest part • Identifying goals can make this seem daunting • You have a robust web presence • You have a sense that there are many areas for improvement • Anything you do is better than not doing anything • C.f. shelf-reading

  16. Framing a single question • Possible starting point: Ask users to validate a single decision • What are the actual questions you get? • Printout(s) of possible webpage(s) – possibly just mocked up • “If you wanted to find an article, where would you start?” • “When does Norlin library close today?”

  17. What question would be your first question? Talk in small groups & we will share

  18. Starting simple • Administrative support for this (more on this later!) • Quiet place for doing the test • Mostly time and interest • Designing a test • Recruiting participants • Conducting the tests • Reviewing your data • Laptops have built-in cameras/mics • One license of Morae (or equivalent)

  19. Scaling upward • Work toward making testing normal • Dedicated space? • Ours is shared with other functions (the IT dept. testing new OS bundles; troubleshooting off-campus access) • Proper usability lab is probably out of reach, and that’s ok • Does a library need to do eye-tracking? • Does a library need to have a note-taker AND a video recording?

  20. Finding participants

  21. Finding participants • I started with posters, Twitter/Facebook • But my real success came when a student forwarded the opportunity to a listserv • There is no substitute for real users • Use library employees only for intranet testing

  22. Finding participants • Do you have time for one question to help us improve the library website? • Incentives for longer participation – food for a little time, gift cards for longer amounts of time? • If incentives are not possible, then frame things as single decisions as much as you can • It doesn’t take many participants • Reach consensus (or not) in 6-10 participants • An absence of consensus is informative

  23. What happens once we have results from our testing? (A few thoughts of preparation)

  24. Those darn results • Be prepared for results that may surprise you • The problems may not be where you thought they were • Be prepared for inconclusive results

  25. Accepting the results • Be prepared for a new power structure • What is your existing power structure? (Design by Committee?) • Emotional decisions and data-driven decisions • “I spent a lot of time on this” and/or “those users are dumb” vs. “the design needs improving” • Craigslist is very easy to use

  26. What are the first three things you will do when you return to your library? Talk in small groups & we will share

  27. Further reading • Dumas, J.S., & Redish, J.C. (1993). A practical guide to usability testing. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing, 1993. • Dumas, J.S., & Loring, B.A. (2008). Moderating usability tests: Principles and practices for interacting. Burlington, Mass.: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2008. • Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: How to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York: Wiley, 1994.

  28. Thank you!Rice.majors@colorado.edu Rice Majors Faculty Director of Libraries Information Technology University of Colorado Boulder AMICAL Conference – April 2012 – American University of Sharjah

More Related