1 / 8

Assessing CLIL learners‘ subject-specific written discourse competence

Assessing CLIL learners‘ subject-specific written discourse competence. Debbie Coetzee-Lachmann Osnabrück University Debbie.coetzee-lachmann@uos.de. The study in brief. Focus: subject-specific written discourse competence

cole
Télécharger la présentation

Assessing CLIL learners‘ subject-specific written discourse competence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessing CLIL learners‘ subject-specific written discourse competence Debbie Coetzee-Lachmann Osnabrück University Debbie.coetzee-lachmann@uos.de

  2. The study in brief • Focus:subject-specific written discourse competence • Sample: 84 10th grade grammar school learners following geography in English • Aim: Develop rating scales, formulate hypotheses about strengths and weaknesses of subject-specific writing • Theoretical framework: socioliterate approach and SFL • Methodolgy: assessing 467 samples of writing using three sets of scales

  3. Theoretical assumptions • Communities use social semiotic systems to construct ideational, interpersonal and textual meanings • The discourse conventions of subject communities are standardised • Teachers have to familiarise learners with these conventions

  4. Geography competence test • Developed in co-operation with educational experts in geography • Tasks involved integrated application of higher order subject-specific competences and production of an extended reponse • Administered at four grammar schools in Lower Saxony Example of task and response: handout

  5. Scales: • Six holistic scales, specified per task, used to assess the degree of task fulfilment. Each scale describes seven levels of performance. • Seven analytic scales with five levels each, used to assess accuracy and appropriateness of textual realisation of meaning (organisation, linking, language use). • Six sets of dichotomous and three-point scales, specified per task, used to assess the correctness and completeness of the content (meaning constructed).

  6. Defining subject-specific task-based written discourse competence The willingness and ability to realise meaning in a written text that meets the requirements of a specific task (content and mini-genre, e.g. description) and that follows subject-specific conventions (models of subject matter and register)

  7. Challenges and solutions • Identifying criteria – presenting possible criteria and preliminary scales to experts • Covering all possible variations in the performances – testing and retesting of scales by different groups

  8. The way ahead • Develop a better understanding of subject-specific discourse through research • Develop teachers’ understanding of subject-specific discourse and their ability to guide learners through their initiation into the discourse community • Start joined projects with members of the different subject communities

More Related