1 / 26

High b p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs

High b p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs. G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors. Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama (JAERI-Japan). Scope of JET small ELM experiments. Obtain plasmas with: High confinement (H 98 ~1) with steady state core/edge

connor-howard
Télécharger la présentation

High b p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High bp experiments in JETand access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama (JAERI-Japan)

  2. Scope of JET small ELM experiments • Obtain plasmas with: • High confinement (H98~1) with steady state core/edge • Compatible with high density (n~0.8 nGR or more) • Acceptable ELM size (projected to ITER) • Max loss to divertor ~4MJ in ITER  3-5% Wped  ELM losses 5-10% Wped • Identify access conditions & potential for extrapolation • Compare JET results other experiments  Asdex-U Type II ELMs and JT-60U “grassy” ELMs regimes

  3. Small ELM regimes in Tokamaks: Type II ELMs in ASDEX-Upgrade • Asdex-U: Type II ELMs found in standard H-modes • Quasi Double Null Configuration (QDN) [J Stober, NF 2001] • Favored by high shaping (~0.4) and q (q95>4) • High density (nped>70%nGR, *ped~1-2), N~1.8, p<1 • Also obtained at high Pin/bp – very high n (n*~0.8?) + high d QDN • Change of MHD stability  high n peeling/ballooning [Sips, PPCF 2002] d=0.43, b=3.5 88%ngr d=0.33, b=2.3 50%ngr d=0.43, b=3.2 83%ngr

  4. Small ELM regimes in Tokamaks: Grassy ELMS – JT-60U • JT-60U “grassy” ELMs: [Y Kamada PPCF 2002] • Threshold in p(p>1.7) • High  (~0.4 ~0.6)/ high q95(6.54) • H-mode edge + ITB & Low density (n<0.5nGR) - *ped~0.1 • Strong Shafranov shift stabilizes Type I ELMs  access to second stability

  5. JET Type II Studies [G Saibene EPS 2003, CP Perez PPCF 2004] • Mixed Type I-II ELMs obtained in SN (& QDN) plasmas (~0.45-0.5) at q95<4 and N~ 2. H98~1, n/nGr~1 • Definition: No type I ELMs + Increase of inter-ELM power losses enhanced broadband fluctuations in magnetics and density (WB)  Tped clamped, nped raise reduced Type I Type I-II nped,min~ 70% ngr

  6. JET: QDN and q95 • Contrary to AUG results: high q95reduces/closes access to mixed Type I-II regimes – QDNhas no significant effect bp~ 0.7 – 0.8

  7. JET: QDN and q95 (2) • q95: Type I III transition at low nped – no Type II • q95: average edge refuelling rate increases – not understood (both SN and QDN)

  8. JET/AUG: is identity + QDN geometry the key to Type II ELMy H-modes? • At identity parms: nped & Tped = constant! (nped*~2)- H98~1 • Low Pin: slow density peaking  radiative collapse • Increasing Pin  Type I ELMs + steady state plasma core No Type I ELMS, & pped=constant • Increasing Ip/Bt at constant q  operational space for Type II ELMsclosed between L-H transitionand Type I-III H-mode regime. • Type II  WB modes at ~10kHz + n fluctuations

  9. Grassy ELMs: High p H-modes • High  configuration, QDN (Dsep <1cm) – standard H-mode scenario (li~1.1) – 1.5-1.2MA/2.7T for high p • Results: • H98~1.2, n~0.9nGr and “grassy-like” ELMs obtained (q95~6.8, the only value explored so far) • Grassy ELMs are very small and irregular in size (H) and frequency (high) • What makes these ELM small? (at high pped) • High p Shafranov shift stabilisation  grassy ELMs? • Comparison with standard ELMy H-modes at low p • Comparison with high p, low li H-modes (qo>2, li~0.7, some with weak ion ITB)

  10. Overview of p scan (high li) • Standard Type I ELM activity up to p ~1.5 with H98~1 • From p ~1.6-1.7, regular H bursts disappear completely (H98 ~1.2) • Irregular “grassy” Ha signature

  11. High p (high li): MHD bursty activity (low frequency only) • Type I: “Standard” MHD spectrum at lower p (broadband ELM signature + wb modes inter-ELM) • Grassy ELMs: small MHD bursts at low frequency, no washboard modes 62413 -p ~1.9 62406 - p ~1.35 • Grassy ELMs MHD signature similar to Type I ELMs but MHD bursts extend very little in frequency

  12. MHD spectra with Grassy ELMs [J Stober, IAEA 2004] ASDEX-upgrade JET

  13. p scan in low liH-modes - shapes • Early heating scenario – no sawteeth (qo~2) – li~0.8-0.85 • Plasma shape: k and d ~ high li H-modes, but SN (note that Dsep <1cm but 2nd x-point is not in vacuum) SN low li – QDNhigh libp~1.9 for both plasmas

  14. p scan in low liH-modes – overview of results • pi increased from~1.0 to 1.9  Type I ELMs observed up to the highest p

  15. Global parameters comparisons at high p • Global confinement similar at high p • Grassy ELM onset confinement and pped are not degraded (cfr Type III ELMs) • High-li, high bp: higher pedestal collisionality for similar pped • Lower limitfor n* for grassy ELMs existence not explored

  16. ELM losses of grassy ELMs • Grassy ELMs: • ELM energy losses <5% Wped(~15% for low li high p ) • Dn/nped- DT/Tped and DW/Wped below typical H-mode values

  17. Low b H-modes – q95 scan Low b H-modes – n scan ELM affected depth – reference • Low p H-modes (p <1): Type I ELM affected depth (LELM) unchanged with ELM size (n and q95) - Depth smaller only for Type III ELMs [Loarte PPCF 2002, PoP 2004]

  18. ELM affected depth – high bp • High p Grassy ELMs  reduction of LELM Change of MHD? • Correlation of LELM with pnot observed for the low li H-modes, High bp/high li H-modes High bp/low li H-modes

  19. Jedge and GrassyELM onset • Link between Grassy ELMs and high p ? • Pedestal stabilisation by Shafranov shift (Ds) both high & low li have similar Ds • The current profile is much broader in the low li pulses, for the same p • Higher edge current (or lower shear) at low li may change the pedestal MHD stability  Type I • Collisionality? High li  n*~0.4, Low li  n*~0.2 (JT-60U n*~0.1) • Caveat: high li equilibrium near to DN, the low li are pure SN

  20. bp – n*/q operational space • AUG sim – Type II q95 =4.2 • QDN – SN Type I-II q95=3 – 3.6 • QDN grassy, high bp – q95=6.7 • SN high bp Type I – q95=7.7

  21. AUG high bp (q95~6.3) SN vs QDN • ASDEX-upgrade equilibria – H-modes with bp~2

  22. AUG: “grassy” ELMs favored by QDN [J Stober, IAEA 2004] QDN pure Grassy ELMs SN mixed Type I-Grassy SN QDN n* ped similar for SN and QDN

  23. Conclusions (1) • High plasma shaping (d, k, QDN)  common element to all small ELM experiments in JET: • At low bp, mixed Type I-II ELMs are observed in SN and QDN – increasing q95 closes off access to high nped and no Type II ELMs. • Type II: MHD/n broadband fluctuations: WB modes  increased transport • High bp: “threshold” similar to JT-60U, but • Grassy ELMs in QDN – high nped (n*~0.4) – high li • Type I ELMs in SN, lower nped (n*~0.2) – lower li. • Asdex-U results (improved H-modes and, more recently, high bp H-modes)  “continuum” between the two type of small ELMs (n*, but MHD?) with QDN still essential.

  24. Conclusions (2) • Role of QDN to obtain steady state Type II ELM pedestal: • Type II ELMs obtained in JET in an identity (= high d QDN) with Asdex-U: Type II ELM phases correlated to enhanced MHD (and n) fluctuations (with n*~2). • Enhanced particle losses obtained – power losses still rather weak (Pin effect) • Increasing Pin or Ip/Bt Type I ELMs come back  • High n* and/or low Tped (resistive MHD) may be necessary to Type II ELMs onset and total Type I ELM suppression. • Insight in ELM physics (in particular role of magnetic geometry) but no direct extrapolability to hot plasmas.

  25. Conclusions (3) • “Grassy” ELMs obtained at high bp • ELMs with low energy losses obtained in high p H-modes – with H98~1.2 and n/nGr~0.9 (demonstrated at q95~7) • The reduction of ELM size correlated to shrinking of the ELM affected depth: change in MHD unstable modes? • In JET, high p is not sufficient to obtain grassy ELMs • The operational space for Grassy ELMs still to be explored • Is high q95 a necessary condition? And QDN shape? • Low edge current/high shear required for Grassy ELM onset? • Difference in n*: does it explain the low vs high li difference in ELM behaviour observed in JET? • Future work: • (Higher Ip) experiments at low n*! as well as QDN  SN – explore lower q95 scenarios and systematically investigate role of li.

  26. Type II ELM  Increased transport and MHD turbulence • When pedestal ~identity (62430)  long Type II ELM phase associated with increased MHD turbulence (low frequency) • n fluctuations up as well – Similar to Asdex-Upgrade Type I ELMs (62428) Type II ELMs (62430) Core MHD

More Related