1 / 0

Stakeholder Involvement in CLUVA: Key Insights and Energy Identification

This document summarizes the stakeholder involvement process conducted for WP3 in April and May 2013, focusing on the presentation of CLUVA results. It explores effective communication strategies to engage stakeholders and identifies where energy and enthusiasm can enhance collaboration for the project. The goal is to determine realistic approaches to involve stakeholders meaningfully and to pinpoint areas of potential engagement that can drive the project forward successfully.

conor
Télécharger la présentation

Stakeholder Involvement in CLUVA: Key Insights and Energy Identification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summing up from yesterday WP3 – a stakeholderinvolvement in april/may 2013 What CLUVA results to present to stakeholders and how? Find the energywheresuch a processwouldbevaluable – where is it realistic? Lise Herslund
  2. Where is the energy? Include CC adaptation in structure plan in Addis – how to makethistransformative? Whatstakeholders and what processes? In Dar – masterplan processclosedprocess! but Kombesrecommendations for awarenessraising and participatory management in hazard-proneareas Whatstakeholders and processs? Lise Herslund

  3. Stakeholder engagement in strategymaking

    ”In collaboration with stakeholderscome up with strategic measures and points of action for climatechange adaptation in the CLUVA case cities…..” (from the CLUVA projectdocument)
  4. Agenda Why do weneed to involvestakeholders? Advantages and disadvantages Involving for resources, anchorage and legitimacy Questions to considerwhenidentifyingstakeholders Stakeholderinvolvement in yourcities?
  5. The process of strategicplanning Healey, 2009
  6. Youneedstakeholdersthat… Provide knowledge and input Represent formal institutions (National/localgovernment, agencies) Representbroadercommunityinterests (remember the most vulnerable groups) Youneedthem to… Definepriorities and assesstrade-offs Act as communityambassadors, messengers of public liasons for the project Communicate decisions and plans to other partner groups, governmentdepartments etc. Gettingcommitment for implementation of actions Etc.
  7. Advantages and disadvantages
  8. Involvingstakeholders for resources Relevant departments in governmentMinistriesNGOsCitizens (organised or not) Scientific expertsRegional representativesPoliticiansNational governmentsSectorboardsEnvironmentalgroupsTrade and labor unions CommunityleadersReal estate developersNews media BanksUtility companies etc.
  9. Potential localgovernmentresources
  10. Potential other public resource
  11. Potential localarearesources
  12. Potential otherresources
  13. Involvingstakeholders for anchorage If stakeholdersareinvolved in strategymakingtheyare more likely to support it -> Easierimplementation of projects Strategies
  14. Involvingstakeholders to gainlegitimacy If stakeholders have beeninvolvedtheyare more likely to consider the strategy or projectlegitimate and to conform to it Politicians, decision-makers and/or citizenscanbecruzial to gain formal legitimacy
  15. Questions to considerwhenidentifyingstakeholders Consider: Theirstake in the issue/vulnerability to CC effects Their formal position Theiraccess to/control over necessaryresources Their power to promote or block Whatcanthey bring to the process? Who has skills, interests, politicalwill to take action – aretheyinvited? Whatroles and responsibilities to whom and when in the process?
  16. Whoareimportantstakeholders in yourcities
  17. Engagement – objectives and actions
  18. Meta-governingstakeholdergroups
  19. Approaches – whatwouldwork in your city What sort of stakeholder processes wouldbe relevant in yourcities to involve the different types of stakeholders? Whocantake the lead in organising and undertake processes? What sort of organisations? (Public workinggroups, networks or?)
  20. Next in the programme Stakeholderanalysis from Addis Ababa Local councils and stakeholders in St. Louis Stakeholderinvolvement in Climate Change Adaptation – Birgitte Hoffmann
More Related