1 / 27

Universal HIV Testing Closing the Gap

Universal HIV Testing Closing the Gap. Peter A. Leone, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of North Carolina Medical Director, NC HIV/STD Prevention and Care, NCDHHS. Number Infected Number unaware of their HIV infection Estimated new infections annually. 1,039,000-1,185,000

cora-vinson
Télécharger la présentation

Universal HIV Testing Closing the Gap

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Universal HIV Testing Closing the Gap Peter A. Leone, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of North Carolina Medical Director, NC HIV/STD Prevention and Care, NCDHHS

  2. Number Infected Number unaware of their HIV infection Estimated new infections annually 1,039,000-1,185,000 252,000-312,000 (24%-27%) 40,000 Awareness of HIV Status among Persons with HIV, United States Glynn M, Rhodes P. 2005 HIV Prevention Conference

  3. Source of HIV tests and Positive Tests • 38-44% of adults 18-64 yrs. have been tested • 16-22 million aged 18-64 yrs. tested/yr in U.S. HIV Tests HIV+ Tests • Private MD/HMO 44% 17% • Hospital/ED/Outpt. 22% 27% • Public clinics 9% 21% • HIV C&T 5% 9% • Correctional facility 0.6% 5% • STD clinics 0.1% 6% • Drug treatment 0.7% 2% National Health Interview Survey,2002; Suppl; to HIV/AIDS surveillance,2000-2003

  4. Former CDC Recommendations Adults and Adolescents • Routinely recommend HIV screening in settings with high HIV prevalence (>1%) • Targeted testing based on risk assessment • Routinely recommend HIV Testing for all persons seeking treatment for STDs • Annual testing for sexually active MSM

  5. Criteria for Targeted screening among 12,038 STD Clinic patients % of % of HIV Patients Patients Prev tested identified tested Risk factors in 10% 39% 7.5% patients or partners Sex Transm Dis, 1998

  6. Criteria for Targeted screening among 12,038 STD Clinic patients % of % of HIV Patients Patients Prev tested identified tested Risk factors in 10% 39% 7.5% patients or partners Risk factors and all40% 79% 3.8% Patients > 30 yrs Sex Transm Dis, 1998

  7. Criteria for Targeted screening among 12,038 STD Clinic patients % of % of HIV Patients Patients Prev tested identified tested Risk factors in 10% 39% 7.5% patients or partners Risk factors and all40% 79% 3.8% Patients > 30 yrs All patients 100% 100% 1.9% Sex Transm Dis, 1998

  8. Texas: Targeted Opt-In Testing Prior to 1996 • Clients with high risk behaviors ( e.g. MSM, IDU,GUD) • Clients requesting an HIV test • Separate consent form required

  9. Texas Focus Groups • Pre-test counseling identified as a deterrent to HIV testing • Many thought they were tested and assumed they were HIV negative after their STI clinic evaluation • Focus group participants strongly recommended making HIV testing routinely part of STI screening

  10. Texas Law • Sec. 81.105 requires informed consent • Sec.81.106 clarifies that general consent is sufficient and specific consent form for HIV testing is not required

  11. Routine Opt-Out Testing Phased Implementation 1996-1997 All clients tested unless: • Client known HIV + • Recently tested (30-90 days) • Client declined test General consent for all STD service (includes HIV testing)

  12. Reasons for Changing to Opt-out • ~50% of HIV+ not tested in some STD clinics • Only ~50% of clients accepted opt-in HIV testing • Routine opt-out testing historical norm for other STD screening • Opportunity for early diagnosis of HIV and screen high risk clients

  13. Results opt-in opt-out N(%) N(%) %change • STD visits 31,558 34,533 +9 • Eligible 19,184(61) 23,686(69) +23 • Pre-test 15,038(78) 11,466(48) -24 • Tested 14,927(78) 23,020(97) +54 • Post-test 6,014(40) 4,406(19) -27 • HIV+ 168(1.1) 268(1.2) +59 Eligible STD Clients Tested 2003-2005 93-96%

  14. New CDC Recommendations forScreening for HIV infection: • In all health care settings, screening for HIV infection should be routinely performed for all patients age 13-64 • Providers should initiate screening unless the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection in the patients they serve has been documented to be <0.1%. • All patients initiating treatment for TB should be routinely screened for HIV infection • All patients seeking treatment for STDs, including all patients attending STD clinics, should be routinely screened for HIV during each visit for a new complaint, regardless of whether the patient is known or suspected to have specific behavioral risks for HIV infection.

  15. CDC Recommendations • Diagnostic testing is performing an HIV test based on the presence of clinical signs or symptoms. • Screening is performing an HIV test for all persons in a defined population. • Targeted testing is performing HIV screening on subgroups of persons at higher risk • Opt-out screening is performance of an HIV test after notifying the patient that the test will be done; consent is inferred unless the patient declines.

  16. New CDC Recommendations In health care settings: · HIV screening is recommended in all health care settings, after notifying the patient that testing will be done unless the patient declines (opt-out screening) · Persons at high risk for HIV infection should be screened for HIV at least annually · Separate written consent for HIV testing is not required. General consent for medical care is sufficient to encompass consent for HIV testing · Prevention counseling need not be conducted in conjunction with HIV testing

  17. Communicating Test Results The central goal of HIV screening in health care settings is to maximize the number of persons who are aware of their HIV infection and receive care and prevention services. • Definitive mechanisms should be established to inform patients of their test results. • Negative test results may be conveyed without direct personal contact between the patient and provider. • Persons known to be at high risk for HIV infection should also be advised of the need for periodic retesting, and offered or referred for prevention counseling.

  18. Changes to NC Administrative Code • Providers and Laboratories to report HIV/AIDS from 7 days to 24 hrs • Remove the strict requirement for pretest counseling • HIV testing can be a part of a panel of tests without a standalone written consent just for HIV testing as long as the consent for testing specifies that HIV testing is included.

  19. CHAPTER 41 – HEALTH:EPIDEMIOLOGYSUBCHAPTER 41A – COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROLSECTION .0200 - CONTROL MEASURES FOR COMMUNICABLE DISEASES10A NCAC 41A .0202 • Testing for HIV may be offered as a part of routine laboratory testing panels where a single consent for all laboratory tests is obtained so long as the patient is notified that they are being tested for HIV and given the opportunity to refuse testing.

  20. NC Recommendations for HIV Testing • Opt-out HIV screening for prenatal and STD visits • Pretest counseling not required • Post-test counseling required only for positives • HIV tests at first prenatal visit and 3rd trimester • HIV test at L&D for all women for whom HIV status is unknown and in infant if test not obtained from mother

  21. Indirect (but compelling) Evidence for Effect in Averting Vertical Transmission • In 1st 2 years, 5 acute cases were pregnant women • 4% of all HIV cases at Prenatal/OB testing sites • ~30% of all female acute cases • All pregnant, acutely HIV infected women received urgent counseling and ART. 5/5 infants have been delivered uninfected. • During this same period, 3 of the 6 infants born HIV infected in NC were born to mothers who were tested and found to be HIV antibody negative early in pregnancy.

  22. Highlights • Every pregnant woman shall be given HIV pre-test counseling, as described in 1510A NCAC 1941A .0202(10), by her attending physician as early in the pregnancy as possible at her first prenatal visit and either in the third trimester or at labor and delivery. At the time this counseling is provided, and after informed consent is obtained, the attending physician shall test the pregnant woman for HIV infection, unless the pregnant woman refuses the HIV test. • (15) Testing for HIV may be offered as a part of routine laboratory testing panels where a single consent for all laboratory tests is obtained so long as the patient is notified that they are being tested for HIV and given the opportunity to refuse testing.

  23. Further Modification to “Routinize” HIV testing in Medical Care Setings "Testing for HIV may be offered as a part of routine laboratory testing panels where a single consent for all laboratory tests is obtained" • "Testing for HIV may be offered as part of routine laboratory testing panels using a general consent which is obtained from the patient for treatment and routine laboratory testing,so long as the patient is notified that they are being tested for HIV and given the opportunity to refuse testing."

  24. General Consent Form I hereby voluntarily consent to medical and/or dental examinations, treatments and procedures including HIV testing, laboratory tests and x-rays which are deemed necessary in the opinion of my physician and health care providers selected by my physician. I understand that no guarantees or warranties have been made to me concerning the results of the examinations, treatments or procedures. My signature acknowledges that I have been given the opportunity to ask questions about this consent form. I refuse HIV testing ________________________

  25. Incorporating AHI Screening in STD clinics: • Screen all STD clients for HIV Ab and AHI • If offering rapid HIV then offer Rapid Test “Plus” -Rapid HIV tests can be offered with symptom screen Problem: Which symptoms (fever?) What time period (2-4 wks)? What duration ( 3 days)? Symptoms at best will detect 40% - Targeted screening Risk based ( i.e. MSM, anal/vaginal sex in past 2 weeks,etc ) Site based ( prevalence 0.5% or type STD,CTS, etc.) 3. Bottom line- rapid testing and AHI screening are not mutually exclusive -Need for further research to define symptom screen and develop predictive models for AHI screening

  26. Incorporating AHI Screening : • Screen all STD clients for HIV Ab and AHI • If offering rapid HIV then offer Rapid Test “Plus” -Rapid HIV tests can be offered with symptom screen Problem: Which symptoms (fever?) What time period (2-4 wks)? What duration ( 3 days)? Symptoms at best will detect 40% - Targeted screening Risk based ( i.e. MSM, anal/vaginal sex in past 2 weeks,etc ) Site based ( prevalence 0.5% or type STD,CTS, etc.) 3. Bottom line- rapid testing and AHI screening are not mutually exclusive -Need for further research to define symptom screen and develop predictive models for AHI screening

  27. Goals • Universal testing of HIV for individuals 14-64 years of age • Opt-out HIV testing in STD and Prenatal settings • Disconnect pre- and post-test counseling from HIV testing itself • Add second HIV test in pregnancy and mandate HIV testing for pregnant women at L&D with unknown HIV status

More Related