1 / 17

Clinical Research: Part 2 Quasi-Experiments

Clinical Research: Part 2 Quasi-Experiments. Reminders. Food day coming soon (5 extra credit points) Course evaluations: Solely evaluate me/lecture (you will complete a separate evaluation of Jenna /lab the day of Exam 3). Overview. How does a quasi-experiment differ from a true experiment?

cottingham
Télécharger la présentation

Clinical Research: Part 2 Quasi-Experiments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Clinical Research: Part 2Quasi-Experiments

  2. Reminders • Food day coming soon (5 extra credit points) • Course evaluations: Solely evaluate me/lecture (you will complete a separate evaluation of Jenna/lab the day of Exam 3)

  3. Overview • How does a quasi-experiment differ from a true experiment? • What are the features of different types of quasi-experiments? • When would a quasi-experiment be useful?

  4. Quasi-Experimental Designs • Experiment • Random assignment to two or more groups • Quasi-Experiment • “Quasi” = almost, so an almost-experiment • Could use non-random assignment • Group assignment could be assigned based on some contextual factor (e.g., school, class, company) • Group assignment could be assigned based on some other participant variable (e.g., diagnostic status) • Participants could self-select their group assignment • Researchers/clinicians could assign participants non-randomly (based on personal preferences) • Might only involve one group (no control group)

  5. Non-Equivalent Control Group Design

  6. Non-Equivalent Control Group Design • Choose two groups (e.g., two schools) that are similar • Make one the experimental group and one the comparison group • Examine how scores on a DV change before and after the experimental program is implemented • Because there was no random assignment, the two groups probably differ in a number of ways (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity, personality) • Confounds reduce internal validity (ability to draw causal conclusions) • Reduce the problem of these confounds by choosing a comparison group that matches the experimental group as closely as possible

  7. Intervention to reduce no-shows at Clinic A

  8. Interrupted Time Series Design • Usually no comparison group • Gather data extensively before and after a program is implemented

  9. Lopez Bernal et al. (2013)

  10. Wagenaaret al. (2009)

  11. TrafficFatalities

  12. Frank’s dog died TrafficFatalities

  13. Controlled Interrupted Time Series Design • Strengths of the non-equivalent control group design (has a comparison group) and interrupted time series design (has longitudinal data)

More Related