1 / 20

Measuring the value of medication reconciliation – Part 2 Discharge processes at AHS

Measuring the value of medication reconciliation – Part 2 Discharge processes at AHS. Tiing Tiing Chih Yang Liu Dr Stephen Lim (Acknowledgement: all senior pharmacists at AHS). History of Med Rec at AHS. AHS started admission MR in 2007 as part of WA SQuIRe projects

cottons
Télécharger la présentation

Measuring the value of medication reconciliation – Part 2 Discharge processes at AHS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measuring the value of medication reconciliation – Part 2 Discharge processes at AHS Tiing Tiing Chih Yang Liu Dr Stephen Lim (Acknowledgement: all senior pharmacists at AHS)

  2. History of Med Rec at AHS AHS started admission MR in 2007 as part of WA SQuIRe projects “M+M” project – medication matching AHS = first hospital to introduce KPIs for Adm Med Rec % of unintentional discrepancies = 17% Ave 17 unintentional discrepancies for 100 meds written i.e. for a patient on 10 medications, 1-2 of the medications will be an unintentional discrepancy

  3. WHO’s High 5s project from 2010 • Benefits = new measures • MR1 • 50% • MR2 • < 0.1 • MR3 • Canadian benchmark 0.3 • AHS: • MR4 • Trending down, last result = 10% • Event Analysis

  4. Event Analysis • Event analysis beneficial as a “fact finding” tool • investigate patient safety problems • to identify if there are problems with the SOP • to identify cause and effect • Multidisciplinary approach • Less labour/resource intensive than RCA • Measurable actions & changes to implement to improve patient safety

  5. It’s discharge time! • DC med rec started late 2007 • Pharmacist involvements: • Med list, CMI • Dispensing • Counselling • Community liaison

  6. Discharge Process Discharge decision made DC script Med chart MMP Pharmacist reconciliation DC Meds Med list CMI Counselling DC liaison

  7. Medication reconciliation on discharge • Proactive model • Patient shows to GP/others • Provide medication list to patient • Decision to discharge patient • Add medication list to discharge summary • Medical officer: • Checks MMP for outstanding issues • Reconciles with medication charts • Signs off NIMC • Writes PBS script for items requiring supply • Pharmacist: Reviews and reconciles : • BPMH (MMP) • Current medication charts • New medicines to start on discharge • PBS prescription • Patient’s Own Medicines • Resolves discrepancies • Communicate D/C summary with • medication list to GP Develop medication list

  8. Discharge summaries at AHS Prior to 2009: Medipal Standalone system “11th hour changes” not communicated Discharge summary sheets Handwritten by dr on pre-printed format Nil or only new meds listed ?? GP liaison ?? Patient copy

  9. Discharge summaries at AHS TEDS (The Electronic Discharge System) implemented in 2009 Pharmacists populate ADR & med list “Import” function allows direct copying of meds from most recent completed TEDS On completion, GP will automatically be emailed

  10. TEDS medication discharge list example • Current and comprehensive list of medicines • Dose changes, indications, explanations of change • Comments section: can use to provide monitoring advice • Includes stopped medications • Includes Allergies/ADRs

  11. Discharge summaries audit Big improvements since TEDS implementation in 2009 QUM 5.3,5.8, 5.9

  12. Discharge Discrepancies Omission Wrong dose Wrong drug Commission ADR

  13. One week DC snapshot Total discharges surveyed = 61 DC reconciliation = 39 (64%) • No active Pcist reconciliation = 22 (36%) • Nil MMP • Low risk pts Pts with discrepancies = 20 (51.3%) Average discrepancies per pt = 0.72 • PBS & legality check • Rx to chart matching • Med list not done by Pcist % incorrect meds per pt = 13% (i.e. at least 1 error per 10 meds taken)

  14. Comparison of Adm & DC MR errors Discharge errors Admission errors

  15. Richard’s discharge Admitted for fast AF, CCF secondary to AF, ? Chest infection Meds on admission: Thyroxine 25microg mane Salbutamol-MDI prn New meds: Digoxin 125microg mane (loading 250microg x 2) Frusemide 40mg mane Metoprolol 12.5mg bd Warfarin + enoxaparin tx dose until INR therapeutic Amoxycillin 500mg tds

  16. Richard’s DC script Warfarin & enoxaparin missing!

  17. Lucy’s discharge Admitting diagnosis: NSTEMI Meds on admission: Allopurinol 100mg mane Methyldopa 250mg bd Paracetamol-SR 1330mg tds New meds started on AMU: Aspirin 100mg mane Ticagrelor 180mg loading then 90mg bd Metoprolol 12.5mg bd DC Rx : frusemide & potassium chloride (Dr thought pt was already taking antiplatelets)

  18. Risk factors contributing to DC discrepancies • Multiple med charts • Nil MMP in place • Brand name confusion • Dr not referring to MMP when doing DC script or summary • Dr from different team handling DC

  19. Challenges for DC med rec • Time / FTE • Nil MMP in place • Dr not contactable to verify discrepancies • Late / urgent discharges

  20. Conclusion • AHS measures coincide with High 5s measures • MR6 • MR6a (% pts whose DC summaries contain a med list) • MR6b (% pts whose DC summaries contain a current, accurate and comprehensive list of meds) • MR6c (No. discrepancies per pt) • MR7 • MR7a (% pts who receive a med list) • MR7b (% pts who receive a current, accurate and comprehensive list of meds) • MR7c (No. discrepancies per pt)

More Related