1 / 9

MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: LESSONS FOR POST-BUSAN PROGRESS

MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: LESSONS FOR POST-BUSAN PROGRESS. Matthew Martin Director Development Finance International DfID Mutual Accountability Seminar 14 January 2013. CONTEXT/BACKGROUND .

coty
Télécharger la présentation

MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: LESSONS FOR POST-BUSAN PROGRESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: LESSONS FOR POST-BUSAN PROGRESS Matthew Martin Director Development Finance International DfID Mutual Accountability Seminar 14 January 2013

  2. CONTEXT/BACKGROUND • Worked with more than 35 governments on mutual accountability frameworks and assessing aid quality (part-funded by DfID, results used in MAR) • Technical Advisor to developing country negotiators in Accra Agenda for Action, mutual accountability key focus of discussions • Member of pre-Busan Task Team and post-Busan building block on mutual accountability (now added results) • Senior Advisor to UN Secretary General on Development Cooperation as part of Development Cooperation Forum (DESA) • Major technical studies on progress/what works in MA • Based on survey covering 104 countries – of MA and results progress – results presented to DCF and BB on Results

  3. MA PROGRESS – KEY PILLARS (%)

  4. KEY AREAS FOR FUTURE PROGRESS • Most vital: targets and annual assessments for individual donors - has greatest influence on donor performance and increased results, + increased MA balance also encourages gvt progress • Enhancing domestic accountability with MA – folding MA into national structures/processes and increasing role of parliaments and civil society • Aid policies – incl. reducing aid dependence + MIC aid phaseout by enhancing domestic resource mobilisation – aid “working out of a job”

  5. CASE STUDY PROGRESS (Q1 2012) • Afghanistan 19/104 – in top 20%: • lacking individual donor targets, • needs to involve non-executive sholders • could improve devt strategy and targets • Sierra Leone 37/104 – in top 40% • no donor targets or assessment • could improve devt strategy and targets, and non-exec involvement

  6. BROAD RANGE OF DFID COUNTRIES • Quite a few DfID priority countries score highly in top 20% – Mozambique, Rwanda, Malawi, Kenya, Tanzania • Some surprising countries lagging on donor targets/assessment – Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, Liberia, Uganda, Zambia • many DfID countries virtually no progress – Nepal, DRC, South Africa, OPT, Kyrgyz, Jamaica, Nigeria, N&S Sudan, Guyana, Pakistan, Tajikistan (+ those in conflict – Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Myanmar, Zimbabwe) • HIGH CORRELATION FRAGILITY ↔ LOW PROGRESS

  7. HOW TO GET THERE: PROMOTING KEY ENABLING FACTORS • Government leadership essential: ensure clear lead institution/unity within government • Like-minded donor group and key sponsors who will push others through peer pressure • Trust – advance on key issues, sectors to demonstrate rapid progress is possible • New Deal should be key step forward for fragile states – but • must be integrated into broader MA steps; • not be used as excuse for “second-best”, but as route to full-fledged MA • Coordinate MA/transparency initiatives – eg aid databases include MA and link to results

  8. HOW TO GET THERE: OVERCOMING KEY BARRIERS • Lack of capacity/understanding among government/donor/non-exec staff • Capacity-building programmes for partner governments and parliaments/CSOs as part of broader accountability drives • Ensure strong donor HQ leadership on MA and integration into work practices and incentives (DfID a leader) • Lack of information on global best practice • Ensure continued monitoring and analysis of progress in context of Global Partnership (DCF survey and analysis to continue/expand) • Political “events” disrupting/reversing progress • very careful definition of process for rowing back and keeping funds flowing to the poor

  9. KEY WAYS FORWARD • Still a lot of work to do in DfID priority countries – especially to prioritise fragile states • Have clear minimum standards (country-led aid policies, targets + annual assessments for individual donors, non-executive inclusion, ND compliance) and adapt to country needs/circumstances • Work with other like-minded to ensure remains among top issues globally and nationally • Continue to share information on progress and enabling factors/barriers (in DfID and beyond) – DESA establishing web repository on best practice • Get the Building Block working more effectively – set targets for its results as TT did - to keep this at centre of Global Partnership

More Related