1 / 20

Developing a Vision of Teaching and Learning for 2025: Lessons Learned

Developing a Vision of Teaching and Learning for 2025: Lessons Learned. Bruce Harris Dixie State University. Teaching & Learning Conference March 2019 St. George, Utah. BACKGROUND:. Higher Education landscape is dramatically changing

cynthiab
Télécharger la présentation

Developing a Vision of Teaching and Learning for 2025: Lessons Learned

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing a Vision of Teaching and Learning for 2025: Lessons Learned Bruce Harris Dixie State University Teaching & Learning Conference March 2019 St. George, Utah

  2. BACKGROUND: • Higher Education landscape is dramatically changing • Institutions must define a vision for teaching and learning to remain viable, competitive, and relevant • DSU is no exception—did not have a shared vision for addressing changes in higher education

  3. BACKGROUND: • How could CTL be a change agent in changing the culture of teaching and learning at the university? • Developing a vision of teaching and learning for the future could influence the next university strategic plan • Current strategic plan says very little about teaching and learning

  4. PURPOSE/CHARGE: • Provost established a Task Force with the charge: • Develop a shared vision that defines and characterizes the culture of teaching and learning at DSU in the year 2025 and recommendations on how to achieve that vision.

  5. METHOD: • 3 primary sources of input for the plan • Stakeholders of the university • Benchmarking visions from innovative universities • Best practices from the literature

  6. METHOD: Used a Design Thinking Approach

  7. METHOD:

  8. METHOD: • 3 primary sources from other universities • Academic Plan: Northeastern 2025 • Stanford 2025 • Deliberate Innovation, Lifetime Education: Georgia Tech

  9. RESULTS:

  10. RESULTS: • Foundational Principles • University must be more Learner Centered • Provide lifelong learning opportunities for learners and other stakeholders—Looped Learning • Align Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILO), Program Learning Outcomes (PLO), and Course Learning Outcomes (CLO)—that can be measured and clearly validated for employers and others • Be an agile learning organization that is quick in responding to changes in the marketplace and/or higher education landscape

  11. RESULTS: • Foundational Principles • Learners will be engaged in the community as leaders, taking major responsibility for the economic, social, and cultural vitality of their communities • University must deliver on its motto: active learning, active life. All learning must be active, effective, and efficient. • Actively integrate and utilize advanced learning technologies such as AI, adaptive learning, VR, AR, etc. to advance personalized and precision learning experiences

  12. RESULTS: • Four Learning Components • Active Learning: Learners will be actively engaged through applied, hands-on, collaborative learning connected with real-world problems and activities. • Integrated Learning: Learners will be connected with local and global communities, develop competencies necessary in an every-changing marketplace, and solve complex problems. • Flexible Learning: Learners will select from an expanded array of pathways and options for a more successful learning experience. • Lifelong Learning: Learners will have access to the university throughout their lifetime, and develop a disposition towards continuous learning.

  13. ACTIVE LEARNING: • Majority of instructional time spent engaged in applied, collaborative learning • All learning spaces, technologies, and formats promote and incorporate active learning • Learning resources, faculty, and support are learner-centered • Active Learning is collaborative in a diverse and inclusive learning environment, and uses social problem solving to ensure learner success • Etc.

  14. INTEGRATED LEARNING: • Opportunity to create a business, organization, or other public impact during the learning experience • Solve complex problems through interdisciplinary and experiential learning • Learners will be engaged in the community as leaders, taking major responsibility for the economic, social, and cultural vitality of their communities • Make meaningful connections to local and global communities • Etc.

  15. FLEXIBLE LEARNING: • Provide stackable credentials and flexible pathways to achievement • Learners will be able to learn anytime, anywhere with flexible pacing and pricing options • Learners can receive credit for assessment of learning achieved outside the classroom (PLA) • Provide competency-based learning options • Learning will be personalized to the needs, pace, and goals of each learner • Etc.

  16. LIFELONG LEARNING: • Focus on foundational skills in pursuit of a mission • Develop essential skills and traits for lifelong learning (e.g. self-regulation, grit, metacognition) • Support services and learning resource infrastructure will expand to meet the growing needs of self-directed learners • University as concierge: Multiple entry and exit points for learning throughout a lifetime • Etc.

  17. LESSONS LEARNED: • A Design Thinking Approach worked effectively to achieve our outcomes • Developing an infographic of the vision was critical to communicate the vision to stakeholders—many did not read the 8-page white-paper prototype • Our target interviews with some stakeholders were not very productive—we should have focused more on the key stakeholders in the initial phases • There was more agreement for the Learning Vision 2025 than we anticipated. Results of a survey of faculty, staff, & students showed 77% agreed and 11% disagreed with the learning vision

  18. Implementation: • Established a working group to implement the Learning Vision 2025 • Prioritized the Learning items—can’t do it all at once • Active Learning • Flexible Learning • Integrated Learning • Lifelong Learning

  19. Implementation: • Currently assessing DSU’s resources and capacity to achieve prioritized Items • Next Steps • Develop strategic Plan for prioritized items • Reach out community members—Public relations and building trust • Integrate the Vision 2025 into next University Strategic Plan

  20. LINK: http://bit.ly/Vision2025DSU bruce.harris@dixie.edu

More Related