1 / 6

Marshall Public Schools

Marshall Public Schools. Response to Intervention February 21, 2011 Holly Knudson & Kelly Konietzko. Essential Components. Universal Screening Multiple tiers of intervention Progress Monitoring Problem Solving team approach Integrated data collection/assessment system

dale
Télécharger la présentation

Marshall Public Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Marshall Public Schools Response to Intervention February 21, 2011 Holly Knudson & Kelly Konietzko

  2. Essential Components • Universal Screening • Multiple tiers of intervention • Progress Monitoring • Problem Solving team approach • Integrated data collection/assessment system • Scientific, research-based interventions • Fidelity • Professional Development

  3. Where Are We Now? Universal Screening • AIMSweb assessment given September, January, and May to all students. Multiple tiers of intervention • Tier 1: Classroom instruction for all students • Tier 2: Approximately 15% of students at each grade level K-8; interventions provided by Title1 teachers, ELL teachers, Fast Forwordparas, SpEdparas and Kindergarten paras. • Tier 3: Approximately 5% of students at each grade level K-8.

  4. Progress Monitoring • Completed by classroom teachers weekly or bi-weekly on students receiving interventions. Problem Solving team approach • Monthly grade level team meetings to study student data. • Monthly problem solving team meetings to review needs of students not yet successful. Integrated data collection/assessment system • AIMSweb data correlated with MCA and NWEA assessment data. • Working to develop a method to more easily compare classroom data with test data.

  5. Scientific, Research-based Interventions • Interventions specialists are researching and learning possible interventions. • Summer project will be to develop an intervention inventory. Fidelity • Implementing interventions the way they were designed to be used for the duration of time they were designed to be used. • Currently we have no method to monitor the fidelity of testing, core instruction or interventions.

  6. Professional Development • Two Prong Approach: • Staff development on RtI and test data • Conducted over 09-11 by SWWC RtI staff and K. Konietzko • Need to continue training staff on understanding RtI model and how to interpret student test data • Staff development on reading and reading strategies • We have begun to provide teachers with reading training, however, a strong need exists to continue training teachers on reading instruction and on reading interventions. • A need exists to revisit our core reading curriculum and to determine areas of strength and weakness and to stress the importance of the curriculum being taught with fidelity.

More Related