1 / 11

Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection

Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection. Aim: to find ALL the AGN. Wilkes, Kuraszkiewicz , Atanas , Haas, Barthel , Willner , Leipski , Worrall Birkinshaw , Antonucci,Ogle , U.T. Cobley & all. Powerful, FRII Radio Galaxies.

dandre
Télécharger la présentation

Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Revealing the heavily obscured AGN population with radio selection Aim: to find ALL the AGN Wilkes, Kuraszkiewicz, Atanas, Haas, Barthel, Willner, Leipski, Worrall Birkinshaw, Antonucci,Ogle, U.T. Cobley& all HEAD Meeting Chicago

  2. Powerful, FRII Radio Galaxies • 3CRR, z~1-2, low-frequency radio-selected • High L/LEdd, log L~1045-46 ergs-1 • Orientation is dominant variable Cygnus A HEAD Meeting Chicago

  3. Chandra X-ray Luminosities for NL+BL AGN Log Hard X-ray Luminosity Log Radio Luminosity (5GHz) • Radio (=AGN) Power comparable • X-ray (“observed”) luminosity of NL sources 10-1000* lower HEAD Meeting Chicago

  4. X-ray Hardness Ratio QSO z~0.5-1, 3CRRs NLRG • Simple Unification: • QSO – face-on: bright + soft (Γ~1.9) • NLRG – edge-on: faint + hard • Exceptions: • 2 QSOs + 1 NLRG: intermediate • 5 soft NLRG Soft Hard X-ray Hardness Ratio HEAD Meeting Chicago

  5. Compton Thick X-ray Luminosity is obscured • HR hardens as LX decreases • Weakest sources include 2ndcomponent: soft excess • Possibilities: • Scattered nuclear light • Extended emission (NLR?) (Wang et al.) • Jet-related (Hardcastle et al.) • Obscuration → decrease Lx • Hard to find + measure obscured sources • HR ≠> NH for low LX Intermediate QSOs Soft NLRG QSOs HEAD Meeting Chicago

  6. Compton Thick? : L[OIII]/LX • 4 soft + 5 hard NLRGs: • high L([OIII]λ5007)/LX • → 9 Compton Thick (CT) candidates • X-ray absorption: • HR → NH~1020-23cm-2 • L[OIII]/LX→ NH>1024.5cm-2 • LX/LR → NHestimate for low S/N sources Juneau et al. 2011 Edge-on Radio Core Fraction Face-on HEAD Meeting Chicago

  7. Radio Core Fraction X-ray Absorption vs. Radio Core-Fraction • Strongly correlated • → Observed X-rays are consistent with orientation dependent obscuration of Unified Models Edge-on Face-on HEAD Meeting Chicago

  8. NH Distribution • NLRG NH peaks at high values, >1024cm-2 • Consistent with z<1 3CRRs (Hardcastle et al 2009) • Obscured fraction ~ 0.5 higher than typical 0.1-0.3 for high Luminosity AGN • CT fraction ~ 0.2 • Consistent with CXRB models (Gilli et al. 2007) HEAD Meeting Chicago

  9. Conclusions • Orientation alone → range of *1000 in observed LX • High S/N X-ray spectra required to accurately estimate intrinsic NHand LX → both generally underestimated • Underestimation of intrinsic LX leads to: • High LXAGN: unobscured, #s underestimated • Low LX AGN: obscured, #s overestimated • Thus: • Luminosity Functions } increase towards lower LX • Obscured fractions } HEAD Meeting Chicago

  10. Luminosity Function and obscured fraction Mayo & Lawrence 2013 50% covered Change in LF if all are CT Obscured fraction vs LX HEAD Meeting Chicago

  11. Conclusions • Luminosity Functions may be flatter, high luminosity active galaxies more numerous than currently deduced • A luminosity-dependent obscured fraction may not be required to explain X-ray and optical data Take care when estimating obscuration for sources in X-ray samples HEAD Meeting Chicago

More Related