1. Ensuring Valid Test ResultsCGCS Annual Meeting Curriculum and Research Directors July 13, 2012

2. Session Outline • Milwaukee and Wisconsin background • Strategies to prevent violations of test security / assessment protocols • Actions taken when reported violations are verified • Response to unverified allegations of violations

3. Background: State Assessment Program • Annual state test, 3-8 & 10; window opens in the last week of October and remains open until just before Thanksgiving • Schools have until the week after Thanksgiving to pack up test boxes and return for scoring • Results returned to schools in February; to the district in March • State historically did not provide erasure analyses or conduct investigations for reported violations of test security

4. Preventative Strategies—Written Documentation • Developed Assessment Ethics Policy • Developed Assessment Procedure Manual, which outlinesa. Rationale for standardized assessment protocolsb. Links to policies on assessment ethics and employee code of conductc. Specific do’s and don’ts with state testingd. Appropriate test prep activities

5. Preventative Strategies -- PD • Require annual training of all staff involved in assessment, including those who proctor, distribute, or box up test booklets • Require face-to-face training conducted by district staff of all designated School Assessment Coordinators and all School Leaders; they are required to train their staff at the sites (can use video supports CS provides) • Require sign-off documentation annually

6. Preventative Strategies -- Analyses • Conduct internal analyses of available data using several years of data • Large gains analysis • Erasure analysis • Omission analysis • Analyses are exploratory, not confirmatory but serve to build awareness of issues • Schools with higher rates of irregularities were flagged and school leaders (and their supervisors) were notified • Analytic procedures will be updated this summerbased on information gleaned from KS conference

7. Actions Taken • Various reports are received, mostly calls to the Department of Research/Assessment, by school staff, who question their own practicese.g. “I didn’t cover up the word list on the wall during testing; is that ok?” or “I found a grade 4 test booklet in the old filing cabinet of the retired guidance counselor. How do I return it to you?” • Confirmed student cheating results in an invalidated test following established protocols

8. Actions Taken • Staff reports of inappropriate practices by their colleagues result in 1. report of allegation to Wisconsin DPI2. internal investigation by Administrative Accountability3. report of results of internal investigation to DPI • Depending on results of investigation, various personnel actions are taken with affected staff

9. Response to Unverified Allegations • Internal allegations that are unverified may result in closer scrutiny of testing situation in the following year • 2012 allegation of unusual test score gains was largely refuted by an unprecedented collaboration between the CGCS, the district (and other affected member districts), UW-Madison’s Value-Added Research Center, and the Department of Public Instruction

10. Further Information • MPS Assessment website:Main MPS Home Page – Departments –Research & Evaluation – Assessment • Or contact:Deb Lindsey, DirectorResearch and Evaluation414-475-8751