1 / 28

Enabling high efficiencies Digital signal conditioning in modern RF transmitters

Enabling high efficiencies Digital signal conditioning in modern RF transmitters. Thomas BOHN June 2008. Agenda. 1. Overview 2. Peak-to-Average-Power-Ratio (PAPR) Reduction 3. Power amplifier linearisation 4. Image suppression and DC-offset compensation 5. Conclusions. 1. Overview

danton
Télécharger la présentation

Enabling high efficiencies Digital signal conditioning in modern RF transmitters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Enabling high efficienciesDigital signal conditioning in modern RF transmitters Thomas BOHN June 2008

  2. Agenda • 1. Overview • 2. Peak-to-Average-Power-Ratio (PAPR) Reduction • 3. Power amplifier linearisation • 4. Image suppression and DC-offset compensation • 5. Conclusions

  3. 1 Overview Architecture of a modern RF transmitter

  4. Conversion-Module PA-Module Digital-Module Image- & Carrier- Suppr. Modulation & Wide bandUp-conversion D/A- conv. Clipping Predistortion PA chain Wide band Down- conversion Time Delay Compens. A/D- conv. Transmitter architecture • Digital-in analogue-out RF amplifier • Signal conditioning right in front of the analogue PA chain • Easiest (cheapest) possible analogue design • Highest possible power efficiency

  5. 2 PAPR Reduction

  6. PAPR ReductionWhat is PAPR reduction ? Clipping ! • Reducing signal power peaks to a certain threshold • increasing the EVM Power @ Soft Clipping Power @ Hard Clipping

  7. PAPR Reduction Why do we perform PAPR reduction ? • PA has to be designedfor the signal peak • driving into saturationproduces intermodulation • PA delivers an averageoutput power • Black: • PAPR: 10.9 dB • 43dBm (12% efficiency) • Blue: • PAPR: 5.5 dB • 45.2 dBm (16% efficiency) Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 3GPP test model 1 (16 codes)

  8. 3 PA linearisation Digital predistortion for higher efficiencies

  9. PA linearisationHow to linearise a PA ? With (digital) predistortion ! • Principle of PA linearisation: • Amplitude distortions can be compensated up to the PA’s saturation point • Phase distortion can be compensated for arbitrary input amplitudes

  10. PA linearisationDigital predistortion - the PA • Complex baseband model for the PA: • Quasi-static nonlinear model (static in the complex baseband) • AM-AM and AM-PM distortions • Complex gain model: • x, y: Complex envelope of RF input and output signal • GPA(|x|) Complex gain depending on the magnitude of the input signal • G(|x|) Magnitude of the gain • F(|x|) Phase shift • ai Complex coefficients

  11. PA linearisationDigital predistortion - the linearisation • PA linearisation with inverse PA characteristic: • Linear PA transfer characteristics up to saturation point: • x, y: Complex envelope of RF input and output signal • M Constant real gain • Linearised PA transfer characteristics up to saturation point: • G(|x|) Magnitude of the gain • F(|x|) Phase shift • ai Complex coefficients

  12. PA linearisationDigital predistortion - the non-linearity (1) • The intervals over the input signal power: • Pout • PA transfer characteristic just for illustration • The “r” depicts the power of the current input sample in the 2nd interval • r1 r r2 r3 (max.) PIN

  13. PA linearisationDigital predistortion - the non-linearity (2) • In the interval :

  14. PA linearisationDigital predistortion - the non-linearity (3) • Block diagram of the PIPOP: • GPD calculation foreach input sample • Predistortion ofeach input sample • Issues to ease theimplementation: • f(x) (= 1 ?) • Base functionsgranularity • Interval widths(equal ?)

  15. PA linearisationDigital predistortion - the adaptation • Coefficient update formula: • For each of the four ( 0 k 3) coefficients within one interval • c - coefficient • d - step width of the algorithm •  - hermite base function • y’* - complex conjugated PD output signal (y’ is the delayed y) • e - error (y’ - w) •  - PD gain

  16. PA linearisationDigital predistortion - the system • Schematic view:

  17. PA linearisationEfficiency and spectral distortions in case of 1 carrier UMTS (1) • Blue: 46.0 dBm • 18.2% efficiency • out of spec • Black: 43.0 dBm • 11.9% efficiency • in spec • Green: 40.6 dBm • 8.35% efficiency • in spec Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 3GPP test model 1 (16 codes, 5.5 dB PAPR)

  18. PA linearisation Efficiency and spectral distortions in case of 1 carrier UMTS (2) • Green: 46.0 dBm • 18.2% efficiency • out of spec • Blue: 46.0 dBm • memory-less PD • in spec with 5dB margin Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 3GPP test model 1 (16 codes, 5.5 dB PAPR)

  19. PA linearisation Efficiency and spectral distortions in case of 1 carrier UMTS (3) • Green: 47.0 dBm • 20.4% efficiency • out of spec • Blue: 47.0 dBm • memory-less PD • in spec Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 3GPP test model 1 (16 codes, 5.5 dB PAPR)

  20. PA linearisation Efficiency and spectral distortions in case of 4 carrier UMTS (1) • Blue: 46.0 dBm • 17.8% efficiency • out of spec • Black: 31.7 dBm • 1.2% efficiency • out of spec • Green: 25.5 dBm • 0.3% efficiency • out of spec Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 4 x 3GPP test model 1 (64 codes, 5.5 dB PAPR)

  21. PA linearisation Efficiency and spectral distortions in case of 4 carrier UMTS (2) • Green: 46.0 dBm • 17.8% efficiency • out of spec • Black • memory-less PD • out of spec • Green • PD with memory effectcompensation • in spec Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 4 x 3GPP test model 1 (64 codes, 5.5 dB PAPR)

  22. 4 Image suppressionand DC-offset compensation

  23. LO(t) QM Modulator v DAC I r(t) k DCI DCQ 90°+p z(t) Q DAC Image suppression and DC-offset compensation Zero-IF transmitter and efficiency • Simple architecture with small amount of analogue components: • 1 analogue quadrature modulator (QM, also known as IQ modulator) • 1 local oscillator (LO) • Half of the signal bandwith @ DACs, Performance of DACs is best around 0 Hz • No frequency selective filters • But: QM has imperfections resulting in DC feed trough and image

  24. Image suppression and DC-offset compensation Spectral distortions in case of 1 carrier UMTS (1) • Green: 46.0 dBm • 18.2% efficiency • out of spec • ACP both • ALT low • Blue: • memory-less PD • out of spec • DC @ ACP low • Image @ ALT low Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 3GPP test model 1 (16 codes, 5.5 dB PAPR) @ 5MHz

  25. Image suppression and DC-offset compensation Spectral distortions in case of 1 carrier UMTS (2) • Green : 46.0 dBm • 18.2% efficiency • out of spec • Black: • memory-less PD • out of spec • Blue: • memory-less PD • Image suppression andDC-offset compensation • in spec Set-up: PA rated for 46.0 dBm; 3GPP test model 1 (16 codes, 5.5 dB PAPR) @5MHz

  26. 5 Conclusion

  27. Conclusion • We are working hard on increasing the energy efficiency of our products ! • What about the energy efficiency of our workshop ?

  28. www.alcatel-lucent.com

More Related