1 / 0

Texas College Readiness Standards

Texas College Readiness Standards. Overview of CRS Validation Process. Courses nominated College Readiness Special Advisors consulted department heads at over 100 Texas postsecondary institutions to nominate entry-level college courses aligned with the CRS Courses submitted

darren
Télécharger la présentation

Texas College Readiness Standards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Texas College Readiness Standards
  2. Overview of CRS Validation Process Courses nominated College Readiness Special Advisors consulted department heads at over 100 Texas postsecondary institutions to nominate entry-level college courses aligned with the CRS Courses submitted 813 instructors submitted a course profile, uploaded a course syllabus, and completed an online comparison of the CRS to course content Total of 930 syllabi submitted (many instructors submitted more than one course)
  3. Specific Courses Analyzed
  4. Course Submissions by Region and Institution Type (partial and complete)
  5. What Does It Mean to Be “Aligned”? Modal faculty response in a subject area was “Most Necessary” or “More Necessary” in preparing students to succeed in the course This represents a score of 4 or 5 on a five-point scale
  6. Alignment Analysis ResultsTo what degree are the Texas CRS aligned with what is required to succeed in Texas entry level college courses?
  7. Areas of Alignment Below 97% Mathematics Geometry Likely explanation is that the three math course titles selected for comparison do not normally contain a great deal of geometry Science Physics See following detailed analysis
  8. Science Analysis Courses in each of the three science areas (biology, chemistry, physics) were analyzed against five general science key content areas and cross-discipline standards In addition, courses in each science subject were also analyzed against subject-specific content standards
  9. Subject Specific Results for Sciences SOCIAL STUDIES (127 standards)
  10. Physics Details Low # of course submissions (N=22) for Elementary Physics I Topics with the most standards identified as Inconsistently Aligned and Not Aligned: Rotating Systems 53% of faculty indicated this will be taught as new material in this course even if students have been taught it before Fluids 37% of faculty indicated this element will be taught as new material in this course even if students have been taught it before Oscillations and waves 40% of faculty indicated that this element will be taught in some detail in the class Thermodynamics 41% of faculty indicated that this element will be taught in some detail in the class
  11. Physics Summary Some topics could be de-emphasized to enhance alignment However, it is unlikely that high school students will be harmed by being exposed to these topics Vertical team of physics instructors could be convened to examine these topics more closely to determine if the physics standards should be edited to clarify how the topics should be treated at each level
  12. Conclusion The College Readiness Standards were validated as reflecting expectations for readiness in a cross-section of representative entry-level college courses from all levels of the state’s postsecondary system
More Related