1 / 65

The Versus Comparison Framework

The Versus Comparison Framework. Kenton McHenry, Ph.D. Research Scientist National Center for Supercomputing Applications. The Problem. The abundance of file formats is a problem when preserving electronic records Why? Will there be software to load the file in the future?

darva
Télécharger la présentation

The Versus Comparison Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Versus Comparison Framework Kenton McHenry, Ph.D. Research Scientist National Center for Supercomputing Applications

  2. The Problem • The abundance of file formats is a problem when preserving electronic records • Why? • Will there be software to load the file in the future? • If not will the specification for the format still exist? • Was the specification ever available to begin with (closed/proprietary formats)?

  3. *.pdf (*.prc, *.u3d) *.k3d *.ma, *.mb, *.mp *.w3d *.lwo *.blend *.iam *.max, *.3ds *.c4d *.dwg *.vtk, *.vtp *.skp

  4. Available 3D File Formats…

  5. Converting Formats • In order to preserve content for future use one option is to convert the file to an open/standardized format that is likely to be supported for some time. • Store both this file and the original for provenance • Ideally with one file format for a particular content type it will be easy for users to view/use the data.

  6. Converting Formats (continued…) • How and which format!? • Fully supporting the many available formats is an enormous undertaking • If a file format is closed/proprietary it may be difficult to retrieve the data directly from the file • May be possible to reverse engineer and recover some of the content • Vendor file formats sometimes store application feature specific pieces of information that’s not supported in other formats • Examples include: animations, physics, … • When converting to a format that doesn’t have a place for such information we must drop it. • Information loss…

  7. Converting Formats (continued…) • There are different ways of storing the 3D content itself • Faceted: • Comprised of vertices and faces • Popular within the graphics community • Boundary Representation: • Comprised of vertices, edges, edge loops, and primitive surfaces • Popular among CAD users • Constructive Solid Geometry • Comprised of boolean operations on primitive volumes • …

  8. Converting Formats (continued…) • Translating geometry representation may not be trivial • B-Rep to Faceted • Translating involves triangulating the surfaces created from the bounded primitives (tesselation) • The resulting sampled surface will suffer from aliasing at high viewing resolutions • Can accommodate by performing a finer triangulation (i.e. more triangles and a larger file) • Faceted to B-Rep: • Translating in this direction is non-trivial! • How does one decide if a group of triangles should be grouped together as part of some larger primitive (e.g. part of a cylinder).

  9. Converting Formats (continued…) • How do we measure information loss? • Which is the best format to use for preservation?

  10. NCSA Polyglot (2009) • Conversions service based on utilizing any and all available 3rd party software • Imposed Code Reuse: Re-attaching a programmable interface to compiled software. • Scripted operations within software • GUI scripting (e.g. AutoHotKey) • Created a simple workflow referred to as an Input/Output Graph • Compared files before/after conversion to measure information loss • Distributed across multiple machines • Web access

  11. ISDA File Migration Tools • Conversion Software Registry • Software Servers • Polyglot • Versus

  12. Software that can Convert between Formats • There is a lot of software available, each with its own unique capabilities • A lot of it is not free • It would be expensive to buy a package just to check if it truly is capable of converting between a desired pair of formats • How can someone know what software to get for their needs? http://isda.ncsa.illinois.edu/NARA/CSR

  13. Adobe 3D Reviewer The Conversion Software Registry

  14. The Conversion Software Registry

  15. Adobe 3D Reviewer Input/Output Graphs

  16. Input/Output Graphs 3DS Max Adobe 3D Reviewer AutoCAD Blender Cinema 4D K-3D LightWave 3D Maya Wings 3D

  17. Input/Output Graphs Shortest conversion path

  18. Software Servers

  19. Software Server • To program against software • i.e. to write new code that can utilize functionality within arbitrary software, compiled code, where the source code is probably not available. • Imposed Code Reuse (or Software Reuse): The process of attaching an API like interface to software so that its functionality can be called within new code.

  20. Software Servers • Shares the functionality of software over the web • In contrast to services which share data: ftpd, nfsd, sambad, httpd • Similar to services such as: telnetd, sshd, VNC, rdesktop • The main difference is in the interface: • Uniform across all software http://host:8182/software/<Application>/<Task>/<Output Format>/<InputFile> • Simple • Widely accessible • Capable of being programmed against • Allows any desktop application to become a cloud based web service*

  21. Software Functionality Sharing

  22. Software Functionality Sharing

  23. Software Functionality Sharing

  24. Software Functionality Sharing

  25. Software Functionality Sharing

  26. Software Functionality Sharing

  27. Software Functionality Sharing

  28. Software • 3D Studio Max • Adobe 3D Reviewer • Google Sketchup • Wings 3D • Blender • K3D • Paraview • VTK • CyberwarePLYTool • NIST X3D Tool • Imagemagick • IrfanView • GIMP • Microsfot Paint • Excel 2010 • Word 2010 • Power Point 2010 • Publisher 2010 • One Note • Access 2007 • Wordpad • Notepad • Calculator2010 • Internet Explorer 8 • Winzip • Photoshop CS5 • Adobe Acrobat • ABBYY

  29. Polyglot • Listens for Software Server broadcasts on the network • Catalogues available input/output operations and constructs and I/O-graph • Identifies conversion paths between input and output formats • Carries out CHAINED conversions

  30. Polyglot

  31. Polyglot

  32. Versus • Java library/framework for comparing file content • Distributed architecture • RESTful Web Interface • http://<host>/versus/comparisons • dataset1, dataset2 • adapter, extractor, measure

  33. Adapters

  34. Descriptors

  35. Extractors

  36. Measures

  37. Extractor Previews

  38. Measuring Information Loss We would like to assign a value to each conversion edge … • With a “universal” converter we could convert files from every format A to every other format B • Assuming we then had a loader for both format A and format B we could load and compare the 3D content independent of how it is stored.

  39. Measuring 3D Information Loss • Adobe 3D Reviewer • Blender • CyberwarePlyTool • K-3D • NIST VRML/X3D • VTK not so good… (e.g. 0.1) good… (e.g. 1.0)

  40. Measuring 3D Information Loss • Data representation • Meshes • Loaders • Use 3D similarity as a means of comparing 3D models • Statistics • Surface Area [Brunnermeier, RTI 1999] • Spin Images [Johnson, PAMI 1999] • Light Fields [Chen, Eurographics 2003]

  41. Statistics • Use the mean and standard deviation of the vertices to represent the model • Simple but fast to compute • Sensitive to size and orientation of the model

  42. Surface Area • Use the sum of face areas to represent the model • Also simple and fast to compute • Sensitive to size, somewhat sensitive to shape. Will detect loss of faces.

  43. Light Fields [Chen, 2003] • Compares silhouettes from various viewing angles around a model.

  44. Light Fields

  45. Light Fields

  46. Light Fields

  47. Light Fields

  48. Light Fields • Fairly fast to compute • Sensitive to shape of convex hull, invariant to rigid transformations

  49. Spin Images [Johnson, 1999] • 2D histograms of the in plane and out of plane distances of vertices neighboring a given vertex. N q b a p

  50. Spin Images

More Related