1 / 2

David Marchant

Journalism is a noble profession, and it should be respected. Unfortunately, that respect isnu2019t always reciprocated, and some journalists have abused the trust of their readers by publishing fraudulent content. Visit : http://www.col-taher.com/fraud-journalism-why-david-marchants-offshorealert-lies-is-a-virus-that-we-played-host/

Télécharger la présentation

David Marchant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. David Marchant 11 Signs You Are Reading Fraud Journalism Journalism is a noble profession, and it should be respected. Unfortunately, that respect isn’t always reciprocated, and some journalists have abused the trust of their readers by publishing fraudulent content. In this post, we will take a look at eleven signs you are reading fraud journalism and what you can do to avoid being misled. From articles with fake sources to headlines that seem too good to be true, these are all red flags that something is not right. If you see any of these signs in an article you read, it’s important to take action and investigate further. It may just be that the journalist has misled you for financial gain, but chances are high that something is amiss. Be vigilant and don’t let yourself get taken advantage of by unscrupulous journalists. You feel outraged by the article When you read an article that makes you feel outraged, it's likely that the article is written with the intent to deceive. Fraud journalism purposefully presents false information in order to create a reaction in its readers. Here are some signs that you're reading fraud journalism: The article uses questionable sources. For example, the article might quote a source who has a vested interest in the matter being discussed, or an unverified source. The article contains inflammatory and unsupported assertions. The author might claim without evidence that a certain practice is criminal, or that a certain group of people is responsible for all of society's problems. The language used in the article is inflammatory and polarizing. The author will often use strong words to drive home their points, and will refuse to back down even after receiving evidence contrary to their claims.

  2. David Marchant • You find yourself defending the reporter even after you disagree with their findings • When you find yourself defending a reporter even after you disagree with their findings, it's time to question whether the article is worth reading. Here are some signs that you may be reading fraud journalism: • 1. The reporter seems to have an agenda. • If the reporter has an obvious bias or desires to push a certain narrative, it's likely that the information in the article is false as well. In this case, it's best to avoid reading any further and look for another source instead. • 2. The article uses questionable sources. • When looking for information, it's important to use reliable sources. If an article does not cite any credible sources, it's probably not worth your time to read further. Instead, focus on more reputable articles that will provide accurate information. • 3. The article relies too much on anecdotal evidence. • Anecdotal evidence can be misleading and unreliable, so always take care when using it in articles. If an article relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, it's likely that the data isn't accurate and should be questioned accordingly. • You can’t shake the feeling that the article was designed to deceive you • 1. The author uses loaded language and victim-blaming to paint all readers as potential fools. • 2. The author fails to disclose their own financial interests in the subject matter they are writing about. • 3. The article relies on discredited sources, anecdotal evidence, and conspiracy theories. • 4. The author presents unsupported assertions as fact, leaving readers with a false impression of the accuracy of their information.

More Related