1 / 40

Accumulating Evidence: Simple and Complex Choices in Humans and Animals

This overview explores cognitive models of decision-making, focusing on evidence accumulation models (EAMs). It covers various areas including rapid and slower choices, stages of decision-making, and future research directions.

davidflores
Télécharger la présentation

Accumulating Evidence: Simple and Complex Choices in Humans and Animals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accumulating evidence: How humans (and animals) make simple (and some not so simple) choices or A cook’s tour of recent work. Andrew Heathcote

  2. Overview (http://www.tascl.org/) • Why are cognitive models of decision making necessary? • What are evidence accumulation models (EAMS)? • Rapid Choices: Monkeys, aging, task switching, inhibitory control in mind wandering and prospective memory. • Slower Choices: popcorn and mobile phones • Stages: Mental Rotation, Multitasking and Conflict Tasks • Where to from here? • NOT COVERED: Foundational EAM work, Law of Practice (and averaging distortion), Measuring RT Distribution, Recognition Memory, Absolute Identification, Nonlinear Dynamics, Mismatch Negativity (MMN), Brain Training • see http://www.tascl.org/andrew-heathcote.html

  3. Why Model Decisions? Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Evidence Accumulation Model (EAM) EAM

  4. Old School Accumulate-to-threshold (DDM) Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A Comparison of Sequential Sampling Models for Two-Choice Reaction Time. Psychological Review, 111(2), 333–367. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922.

  5. New(castle) School Accumulate-to-threshold Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2005). A Ballistic Model of Choice Response Time. Psychological Review, 112(1), 117–128. Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57(3), 153–178.

  6. Monkey Business Heitz, R. P., & Schall, J. D. (2012). Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff. Neuron, 76(3), 616–628. Cassey, P., Heathcote, A., & Brown, S. D. (2014). Brain and Behavior in Decision-Making. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(7): e1003700.

  7. Monkey Mixtures 5-10% of trial in the accuracy condition monkeys disobeyed instructions and went fast. Heitz & Schall (2012). Figure 3 Speed Neutral Accuracy Rae, B., Heathcote, A., Donkin, C., Averell, L. & Brown, S. (2014). The Hare and the Tortoise: Emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 40, 1226-1243.

  8. Why does it matter? • What causes slowing in people with Schizophrenia? • Slowing pervasive in Sz • Errors less studied/more equivocal • We found a tradeoff with rate effects masked by greater caution. Heathcote, A., Suraev, A., Curley, S., Love, J. & Michie, P. (invited resubmission). Decision processes and the slowing of simple choices in schizophrenia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology • Does aging slow your clock? • Diffusion-model analysis (many papers by Ratcliff and co): • slowed fingers (non-decision time), • more cautious (higher threshold), • the rate & quality of evidence preserved (except for fine perceptual discriminations). Speculation: might pre-dementia have a different signature?

  9. Caution or Inflexibility? Sub-thalamic nuclus (STN) controls caution: BOLD correlates with LBA. Forstmann, B. U., Dutilh, G., Brown, S., Neumann, J., Cramon, Von, D. Y., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. PNAS, 105(45), 17538–17542. Ability to change threshold depends on tract strength from pre-SMA. Forstmann, B. U., Anwander, A., Schäfer, A., Neumann, J., Brown, S., et al. (2010). Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. PNAS, 107(36), 15916–15920. Tract strength weakened by age (less able to be “fast-but-careless”) Forstmann, B. U., Tittgemeyer, M., Wagenmakers, E. J., Derrfuss, J., Imperati, D., & Brown, S. (2011). The Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in the Elderly Brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(47), 17242–17249. Joining the party: STN BOLD - DDM threshold correlated in task-switching. Mansfield, E. L., Karayanidis, F., Jamadar, S., Heathcote, A., & Forstmann, B. U. (2011). Adjustments of Response Threshold during Task Switching. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(41), 14688–14692.

  10. Task Switching <5 or ODD = left >5 or even = right 1 3 7 2 6 4 9 8 First application of EAM to task-switching: caution, rate and delay effects Karayanidis, F., Mansfield, E. L., Galloway, K. L., Smith, J. L., Provost, A., & Heathcote, A. (2009). Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(2), 202–215. Reduced switch costs in the aged (slower repeats as inflexible thresholds) Karayanidis, F., Whitson, L. R., Heathcote, A., & Michie, P. T. (2011). Variability in proactive and reactive cognitive control processes across the adult lifespan. Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (318).

  11. Cognitive Control Task Switching Parallel Model

  12. Unobserved accumulation The stop-signal paradigm: measure of inhibition

  13. Stop Signal Task X = press left O = press right X O O X X O O O X Success depends on the ability to inhibit and the stop-signal delay – short for the 1st (easy), long for the second (hard). Mittner, M., Boekel, W., Tucker, A., Turner, B., Heathcote, A. & Forstmann, B. U. (2014). When the brain takes a break: A model-based analysis of mind wandering, Journal of Neuroscience,34(49), 16286-16295. Badcock, J. C., Michie, P. T., Johnson, L., & Combrinck, J. (2002). Acts of control in schizophrenia: dissociating the components of inhibition. Psychological Medicine, 32(2), 287–298.

  14. Prospective Memory: Remembering to Remember tree fird juse wrangle store animus gring carpet spankel hopeful jussin nergul tree fird juse wrangle store animus gring carpet spankel hopeful jussin nergul Is it a WORD or a NONWORD? (but if it contains the syllable “tor” press thumb of right hand) Is it a WORD (middle finger) or a NONWORD (index finger)? Respond with left hand

  15. Prospective Memory Heathcote, A., Loft, S., & Remington, R. W. (2015). Slow down and remember to remember! A delay theory of prospective memory costs. Psychological Review. Strickland, Loft & Heathcote (in preparation). A race model of prospective memory

  16. Context Effects Movie goers were offered a small popcorn for $2 or a large one for $7. Everyone chose the cheaper option. $7 $6.50 $2 Then a third option was introduced, a medium popcorn for $6.50. This caused people to prefer the large popcorn with comments like "We may as well get it because it is only 50c more" Trueblood, J.S., Brown, S.D., Heathcote, A. & Busemeyer, J.R. (2013). Not just for consumers: Context effects are fundamental to decision-making, Psychological Science, 24, 901-908.

  17. Multi-attribute LBA Trueblood, J.S., Brown, S.D. & Heathcote, A. (2014). The Multi-attribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multi-alternative choice. Psychological Review, 121, 179-205.

  18. Best-Worst Task

  19. Best race Parallel Best-Worst LBA Best (fastest) Worst race Worst (fastest) Independent best and worst races occurring in parallel. Best race driven by drift rates d(x), worst race driven by drift rates 1/d(x) (cf. Marley & Pihlens, 2012)

  20. LBA: Best-Worst RT Distributions Predicted Predicted Observed Observed Hawkins, G. E., Marley, A. A. J., Heathcote, A., Flynn, T. N., Louviere, J. J., & Brown, S. D. (2014). Integrating cognitive process and descriptive models of attitudes and preferences. Cognitive Science, 38, 701-735. Jones, L.G., Hawkins, G.E., & Brown, S.D. (in press) Using best-worst scaling to improve psychological service delivery: An innovative tool for psychologists in organized care settings. Psychological Services

  21. Stages Provost, A., Johnson, B., Karayanidis, F., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2013). Two routes to expertise in mental rotation. Cognitive Science, 37, 1321-1342.

  22. Complex Decisions The independent race equation: Eidels et al. (2010).

  23. Mental Rotation: Do They Match?

  24. Multi-Stage Theory Provost, A. & Heathcote, A. (2015). Titrating Decision Processes in the Mental Rotation Task, Psychological Review (invited resubmission)

  25. The Costs of Multi-Tasking

  26. The Costs of Multi-Tasking

  27. Fun Facts & Supertaskers Who Multitasks? (media and mobile phone when driving) No gender differences, rather those who can block out distractions! Positively correlated: perceived (overestimated!) multi-tasking ability, impulsivity & sensation seeking, Negatively correlated: working memory capacity(OSPAN). Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Watson, J. M. (2013). Who Multi-Tasks and Why? PLoS ONE, 8(1) Supertaskers Can do a driving simulator task and OSPAN with no decrement! Not your or me (2/1000)! Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2010). Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 479–485. Gatekeeper: the Dual n-back task from hell! Heathcote, A., James R. Coleman, J.R., Eidels, A.,Watson, J.M., Houpt, J. & Strayer, D.L. (accepted 28/4/2015). Working memory’s workload capacity, Memory & Cognition. http://psych.newcastle.edu.au/~dje593/Gatekeeper_XOR/

  28. The Gatekeeper Task “P”” “Y” Double Target Block “P” Time Single Visual Block “O” Single Auditory Block “P” Dual 2-Back with Visual & Auditory Stimuli “Y” Non-target Allow

  29. OSPAN Test 7+2=10 N 18+2=19 3+4=7 3+12=14 L C T W 8+9=17 14-6=8 A C P H 5+10=15 8+8=16 7+5=12 ? N C L T W A H P C

  30. Conflict Tasks: e.g., the Stroop Task BLUE RED GREEN XXX XXXXX XXXX GREEN BLUE RED

  31. Conflict Tasks: e.g., the Simon Task RIGHT LEFT

  32. Conflict Tasks: e.g., the Simon Task

  33. Conflict Tasks: e.g., the Simon Task

  34. Simon conflict stimulus: Left symbol at right location Simon TPEA Phase 1 (pre-response phase) Evidence accumulates but a response cannot be made as the threshold is absent/infinite (Laming’s “premature sampling”) Phase 2 (response phase) Begins at time Te when stimulus “encoded” (i.e., conflict sufficiently although not fully resolved). In Phase 2 threshold present/finite, and accumulation occurs until response. Example showing TPEA at the start of Phase 2. =LBA

  35. Stroop-Simon: Delta and CAF Increasing (Stroop) delta function associated with slow errors

  36. Stroop-Simon: Parameters Replicates cross-over bias pattern in Simon, minimal effect in Stroop. Little difference Stroop & Simon v. d’ only cause of Stroop effect.

  37. The Flanker Task ? < or > ? >><>> >>>>> >><>> <<><< <<<<< >>>>>

  38. Flanker: White et al., (2011): Experiment 1. Increasing delta function Fast errors Similar to pattern for Vertical Simon but errors VERY fast

  39. Flanker: Parameters Strong bias crossover as in Simon, consistent with fast errors. d’(congruent) > d’(incongruent) Shows strong bias crossover (causing very fast errors) can be associated with an increasing delta function.

  40. Conclusions & Future Directions • Levels of Description: The Gas Law • Occam’s Razor: “entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity” (cross-validation/MDL/Bayes1) • Back to the 80’s: COCO global memory model • Wide-wake drunk (alcohol & energy drinks) • Pre-dementia vs. Aging: • Complex real-world tasks (PM & UAVs) 1http://www.utas.edu.au/health/study/cpdu/events/cpdu/2015/june/practical-bayesian-analysis-with-bayes-factor/_nocache

More Related