1 / 33

Dileptons and Photons

Dileptons and Photons. Huan Z Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Los Angeles Department of Engineering Physics Tsinghua University. Collision Dynamics. Photon Sources in Quark-Gluon Plasma. “Naïve” Leading Order Processes: q + q (g) → g (q) + γ. q. q.

davis-hebert
Télécharger la présentation

Dileptons and Photons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dileptons and Photons Huan Z Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Los Angeles Department of Engineering Physics Tsinghua University

  2. Collision Dynamics

  3. Photon Sources in Quark-Gluon Plasma “Naïve” Leading Order Processes: q + q (g) → g (q) + γ q q g [Kapusta etal ’91, Baier etal ’92] But: other contributions toO(αs) collinear enhanced Dg=(t-mD2)-1 ~ 1/αs Bremsstrahlung Pair-ann.+scatt. + ladder resummation (LPM) [Aurenche etal ’00, Arnold,Moore+Yaffe ’01]

  4. p p γ γ p,a1 r p r p p,a1 Photon Sources in Hadron Gas • Photon-producing reactions: mostly at dominant (q0>0.5GeV) gauge invariance! q0<0.5GeV a1-strength problematic Hadron Form Factor Important for photon yield

  5. p γ p γ p K K* K K* (ii) wt-Channel p γ Gwrplarge! potentially important … w [Turbide,Gale +RR ’04] r p More Meson Gas Sources (i) Strangeness Contributions: SU(3)F MYM ~25%of pp→ργ ~40%of pr→pγ! (iii) Higher Resonances Ax-Vec:a1,h1→pg,Vec:w,w’,w’’→pgother:p(1300)→pg f1→rg, K1→Kg K*→Kg a2(1320)→pg

  6. Sp r > Sp > Baryonic Contributions • use in-medium r –spectral funct: • constrained by nucl. g-absorption: g N → p N,D gN gA B*,a1,K1... N,p,K… g N → B* p-ex [Urban,Buballa,RR+Wambach ’98]

  7. HG Emission Rates: Summary • wt-channel (very) important • at high energy • form factor suppression (2-4) • strangeness significant • baryons at low energy mB=220MeV Though EM is well understood, photon production in collisions complicated dynamics !! [Turbide,RR+Gale ’04]

  8. PQCD photons Initial hard production: pp → γX scaling with xT=2pT /√s , + power-law fit[Srivastava ’01]

  9. Au + Au QGP ?! Hadron Gas “Freeze-Out” Naively Thermal Photons  T The higher temperature, the more thermal radiation ! But the relation between initial T and photons is non-trivial !

  10. Predictions for Central Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV ‘pre-equilibrium’ contribution from parton cascading  major contribution QGP thermal radiation  1-2 GeV (maybe)

  11. Direct g in d+Au PHENIX • p+p and d+Au spectra compared to NLO pQCD • ratio to NLO pQCD • consistent with 1 • No indication for nuclear effects 2 No surprises !

  12. Direct Photons Surely There! p0 suppression  helps Lines Nbinary Scaling

  13. Direct Photons • Direct photon spectra over centralities • Systematic Error: ~15-20% • Clearly seen that we measured photons over the order of 1027! • See the scale please.. • Again, Thickness-scaled NLO QCD calculation describes all the spectra very well • From Central to Peripheral • No exception within current errors • Yellow bands show uncertainty on NLO pQCD calculation and thickness function

  14. Results (RAA) • Photon RAA is consistent with unity over all the centrality. • the yield follows thickness-scaled hard scattering • p-p reference from NLO pQCD Calculation • 0 RAA decreases to ~0.2 at Npart=320 • Dotted line shows uncertainty of thickness function • Error bars show total error (systematics + statistical) except thickness function error • Yellow shows uncertainty on pQCD calculation Direct g p0

  15. Comparison with calculations • Any of pQCD calculations describe data well • Adding kT broadening makes factor of ~2 difference • Around same factor as E706 • Calculation suggests that slopes of the spectra at RHIC and E706 are same • Jet Photon included calculation (Fries et al., PRL 90, 132301 (2003)) is also shown • Fits very well above 4GeV! • Assuming existence of hot dense medium • Prompt partons scatter with thermal partons • The line approaches to simple pQCD calculation in high pT

  16. Any Hope for QGP Radiation? • Most realistic calculation • Including all the contributions PHENIX may be able to see QGP contribution in 1-3GeV/c PRC69(2004)014903

  17. Quenching = Jet-Plasma interaction. Does this have an EM signature? The plasma mediates a jet-photon conversion Fries, Mueller & Srivastava, PRL 90, 132301 (2003)

  18. Comparison between model and exp

  19. Lattice QCD Polyakov Loop Chiral Condensate • Coincident transitions: • deconfinement and chiral symmetry restoration • it is seen to hold also vs quark mass

  20. Chiral Symmetry How Chiral Symmetry has manifested in nucleus-nucleus collisions? We must measure vector mesons in both hadronic and leptonic decay channels! electron PID  TOF upgrade HFT – reduce conversion BK K-pi PID  TOF upgrade h and h’  EMC + high statistics Baryonic resonances (D,L(1520),S(1385),X(1530)....)

  21. Vector Meson Mass and Chiral Symmetry • mesons: No significant width change or mass shift has been observed. Measurement of both K+K- and e+e- channels. r mesons: Some kind of mass shift has been observed in STAR, but the interpretation of the shift is not clear! Measurement of r mesons in e+e- channel is needed! Measurement of p+p- invariant mass and the residual distribution after combinatorial background subtraction --- r and s mesons --- the nature of s mesons (q-qbar or four-quark) Electron measurement will be possible with the TPC and TOF -- remove photon conversion and Dalitz background !

  22. What is expected (dileptons) • Low masses receive significant contribution from radiative decays • High masses dominated by DY • Intermediate mass region interesting from QGP perspective, (Shuryak (78), Shor (89)) • Photons: similar story, but featureless spectra • Experiments: DLS, Helios, TAPS, NA38, -50, WA98, CERES, PHENIX, HADES, NA60

  23. Low Masses:Vector Meson Spectral Densities:Hot Meson Gas The spectral density is flattened and broadened Rapp, Gale (99)

  24. Very Difficult to Measure Di-leptons

  25. NA60 Comparison of data to RW, BR and Vacuum  (Broadening vs Shift) Sanja Damjanovic pT dependence

  26. Quark-Gluon Fluid Chiral Properties at Tc -- quasi-particles -- mass shift -- width broadening Dilepton Measurement -- in the low mass region 0.5-2 GeV/c2 -- very difficult

  27. The END

  28. pTassociated varies pTtrigger varies Two-Particle Correlations in d+Au STAR preliminary STAR preliminary Background-subtracted correlations between a high-pT trigger charged particle and an associated charged particle

  29. Photon-hadron correlations STAR preliminary STAR preliminary g+jet correlation in Au+Au in run4? More accurate determination of initial Et

  30. Results for p-p Bands represent systematic errors. (Subtraction) Errors on the backgrounds result in enlarged errors on the signal, especially at low-pT region. • NLO-pQCD calculation • CTEQ6M PDF. • Gluon Compton scattering + fragmentation photon • Set Renormalization scale and factorization scale pT/2,pT,2pT • Systematic Error: • 20(high pT)-45(low pT)% The theory calculation shows a good agreement with our result.

  31. dE/dx at high pT (62.4 GeV) 2/ndf = 1.5 pT > 3 GeV/c Pion-proton Separation ! rigidity (charge*dE/dx) [keV/cm] negatives positives

  32. Jet Photon overwhelms QGP? • Break-up of Fries prediction • Jet Photons overwhelms all the other contributions below 7GeV/c • Jet production rate calculated by LO pQCD with K factor compensation of 2.5 • pQCD photon calculation from LO with no K factor • Fitting too good! • In Peripheral, the calculation should fit the data as well • RAA and spectra themselves tell you what happens • Calculation is assuming existence of hot dense medium, which is not the case in peripheral!

More Related