html5-img
1 / 8

SCOTSEM Draft Final 2010 Strategic Plan

SCOTSEM Draft Final 2010 Strategic Plan . Strategic Plan Development Process. First SCOTS strategic plan published in 2004 Sept 2009: “Strategic Themes” white paper developed, based on phone interviews with: Ernesto Acosta, TSA; Mark Bush, AASHTO ;

dawn
Télécharger la présentation

SCOTSEM Draft Final 2010 Strategic Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCOTSEM Draft Final 2010 Strategic Plan

  2. Strategic Plan Development Process • First SCOTS strategic plan published in 2004 • Sept 2009: “Strategic Themes” white paper developed, based on phone interviews with: • Ernesto Acosta, TSA; • Mark Bush, AASHTO; • John Contestabile, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory; • David Ekern, Virginia DOT; • Dan Ferezan, FHWA; • John Haas, Iowa DOT; • Mark Krentz, Kansas DOT; • Chuck Runyon, West Virginia DOT; • Steve Sprague, TSA; • Jeff Western, Western Management and Consulting; • Bob Younie, Iowa DOT; • Draft SCOTSEM Strategic Plan developed Feb 2010

  3. Process (Continued) • Ernesto Acosta, TSA • Bill Brownlow, AASHTO • Mark Bush, AASHTO • John Contestabile, Johns Hopkins • David Ekern, Virginia DOT • Steve Ernst, FHWA • Dan Ferezan, FHWA • Mark Krentz, Kansas DOT • Herby Lissade, CalTrans • Eileen Phifer, Michigan DOT • Laurie Radow, FHWA • Chuck Runyon, West Virginia DOT • Bryan Smith, Idaho DOT • Jeff Western, Western Management and Consulting • Bob Younie, Iowa DOT • SCOTSEM “Leadership Team” met in March 2010 in Washington, DC to discuss plan, participant included: • Draft Strategic Plan circulated to SCOTSEM members

  4. Vision and Mission Mission Be the voice and leader…in developing security solutions that assure an all-hazards approach to emergency management…through partnerships…on security and emergency management advocacy, research program implementation, policy development, and training and awareness. Vision A secure transportation system that assures the mobility and prosperity of all Americans through resiliency to threats from all hazards.

  5. Goal 1: Advocate Transportation’s Role Advocate for the important role of resilient transportation systems in security and all-hazards emergency management. Objectives: 1.A. Promote DOT role in security and all-hazards emergency management that highlights prevention, protection, response, recovery, and mitigation functions. 1.B. Promote DOT role in security and emergency management via strategic alliances.

  6. Goal 2. Research & Development Assure a comprehensive program of research and development to achieve security and all-hazards emergency management solutions. Objectives: 2.A. Work with NCHRP, TCRP, TRB, FHWA, DHS, TSA and others to ensure continued growth of a research program that supports SCOTSEM goals and includes study of best practices and solutions. 2.B. Operationalize appropriate security and emergency response and management research results into the practices of state DOTs and their partners.

  7. Goal 3. Policy, Legislation, Funding, Regulation Assist in shaping and implementing national policy, legislation, funding, and regulatory development on security and all-hazards emergency management issues. Objectives: 3.A. Provide a vehicle for coordinating proactive state DOT action on relevant national federal policy matters. 3.B. Support state DOTs in securing federal funding for key security initiatives on modal transportation systems and help with issues related to reimbursement by FEMA & FHWA for costs incurred.

  8. Goal 4. State-of-the-Practice & Awareness Advance DOT’s state-of-the-practice in and awareness of security and all hazards emergency management education, tools, and technical assistance. Objectives: 4.A. Establish a capability to share security-related information among state DOTs, AASHTO committees and private partners to encourage greater awareness. 4.B. Develop strategy for building consensus among AASHTO members on integrating security and emergency management processes and procedures into formal AASHTO documents. 4.C. Participate in, develop, sponsor, or lead security and emergency response and management training for state DOTs and their partners.

More Related