170 likes | 296 Vues
Join Aisha Jackson, Program Manager for Teaching & Learning Applications, as she discusses the D2L experience at CU-Boulder. With approximately 32,000 students and 2,100 faculty, we reflect on the selection criteria, implementation schedule, and the growth of tool usage. Key issues highlighted include the lack of communication surrounding changes, risks during migration to a new file storage system, and the importance of transparency. We explore strategies for evaluating third-party integrations and improving overall communication for future changes.
E N D
The Desire2Learn (D2L) ExperienceCommon Solutions Group Talk Aisha JacksonProgram Manager – Teaching & Learning Applications Thursday, September 19, 2013
≈32,000 Students ≈2,100 Faculty
Root Cause D2L Said… CU-Boulder said yes, but… No consideration of risk and potential impact to CU-Boulder Lack of communication about change We weren’t informed of work We weren’t given a choice in scheduling the work • Failure while migrating CU-Boulder to new file storage system
Managing After the Outage • Transparency and communication was key • Accessed the best past forward with D2L
Changing Our Agreement • Consider risk and impact when making changes • Notify us of changes that have the potential of impacting our campus
What’s next? Outage Related Non-Outage Related Framework for evaluating 3rd Party Integrations Making D2L easier to use • Facilitating department level contingency planning • Improving the management of D2L as a vendor
Discussion and Questions… aisha.jackson@colorado.edu