1 / 18

Micro correlations and tail dependence

Micro correlations and tail dependence. Roger Cooke Resources for the Future & Dept. Math TU Delft Vine-Copula workshop Dec. 16-17, 2008 .

delu
Télécharger la présentation

Micro correlations and tail dependence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Micro correlations and tail dependence Roger Cooke Resources for the Future & Dept. Math TU Delft Vine-Copula workshop Dec. 16-17, 2008

  2. Subsequently, insurers were required by September 30, 2007 to make “true up” filings based on their actual reinsurance costs and pass on to the insureds the actual savings which resulted from the expanded FHCF coverage. …State officials are perplexed over the failure of the 2007 insurance reforms to bring about meaningful rate reduction. In October 2007, the OIR served Allstate with broad subpoenas, demanding an explanation of the criteria Allstate used when it began dropping 300,000 homeowners policies starting in 2005 and justification for its rate filings. FLORIDA INSURANCE REFORM: One year after a massive legislative overhaul, is Florida any closer to finding a solution to its property insurance problems? By Fred E. Karlinsky, Shareholder, and Richard J. Fidei, Partner Colodny, Fass, Talenfeld, Karlinsky & Abate, P.A.

  3. Background: Catastraphe insurance market failure

  4. … insurers were required by September 30, 2007 to make “true up” filings based on their actual reinsurance costs and pass on to the insureds the actual savings which resulted from the expanded FHCF coverage. …State officials are perplexed over the failure of the 2007 insurance reforms to bring about meaningful rate reduction. In October 2007, the OIR served Allstate with broad subpoenas, demanding an explanation of the criteria Allstate used when it began dropping 300,000 homeowners policies starting in 2005 and justification for its rate filings. FLORIDA INSURANCE REFORM: One year after a massive legislative overhaul, is Florida any closer to finding a solution to its property insurance problems? By Fred E. Karlinsky, Shareholder, and Richard J. Fidei, Partner Colodny, Fass, Talenfeld, Karlinsky & Abate, P.A.

  5. “Here in Lee County, property insurance premiums are proving to be the straw that broke the camel's back in so many foreclosure proceedings. A mortgage is in default if insurance premiums are not paid. These high premiums, coupled with escalating adjustable mortgages, are the main reasons there were more than 1,000 foreclosures in July with no end in sight.” http://www.taylor.house.gov

  6. Micro Correlations Let X1,...X2N be identically distributed random variables with variance σ2 and COV(Xi,Xj) = c. Then ρ( i=1..NXi , i=N+1..2NXi) = N2c  → 1 (N → ) Nσ2 + N(N-1) c

  7. Eg σ2=1, c=0.01, N = 1000 ρ( i=1..NXi , i=N+1..2NXi) = 0.91

  8. Lp processes may be the ‘natural’ way to get tail dependent, fat tail distributions (X1,..) have a L1 symmetric distribution with gamma prior if, for any n, the n-dimensional marginal density is given by p(x1,…xn) = e-λΣxi-1a e-a (1/()) d. Setting n = 1 and integrating over λ, the univariate density = p(x) = a / (a+x)+1

  9. The sum of n L1 vbls is a (gamma gransform of) an Ln process The density of the sum of the n variables is p(Σi=1..n Xi = r) =  (1/(n))nrn-1e-r-1ae-a(1/())d = rn-1a(+n) / [()(a+r)+n].

  10. Tail Dependence For variables X,Y with the same distribution, the upper tail dependence of X and Y is UTD(X,Y) = limR P(X>R  Y>R) / P(X>R).

  11. The upper tail dependence of sums of N L1 variables is k,j=0..N-1 (1/2)j+k(+k+j) / [ ()k!j!] (1/2) k=0..N-1(+k) / [k!()]

  12. UTD, correlation depend on shape and on n

  13. Lower tail dependence(no closed formula)

  14. Lower quadrant conditional correlations

  15. Idem, log scale

  16. idea • Fix claims type (eg coastal) • Fix time window • Model claims aggregation as Lp process • Find aggregation level and indemnity level R st correlation Sum < R is small. • Private insurance markets can work under claim level R. • Above R, own risk or govt risk

  17. N/2 illustration N Policy packages

More Related