1 / 70

Habitat for whom?

Habitat Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental Engineering Technology Murray State University. Habitat for whom?. Habitat for Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. Channel Habitat.

desma
Télécharger la présentation

Habitat for whom?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Habitat AssessmentDeveloped by Ken CookeKentucky Division of WaterWatershed Watch Program CoordinatorModified by Mike KempProfessor of Environmental Engineering TechnologyMurray State University

  2. Habitat for whom?

  3. Habitat for Benthic Macroinvertebratesand Fish

  4. Channel Habitat

  5. In Stream Characteristics

  6. Pools and Riffles Pool Riffle

  7. Sand Gabbard Substrate Scale Gravel Cobble Boulder

  8. Name That Sediment! 2 1 3

  9. High Gradient Stream

  10. Low Gradient Stream Low-gradient streams typically have very gentle channel slopes, meandering streambeds made of fine sediments, and slow water flow.

  11. Your Stream Reach 100 m 300 ft At Least 1 Riffle

  12. Site Characterization Provides location information and site descriptions

  13. Habitat Assessment 10 point evaluation of the stream’s ecological health and fitness

  14. Habitat Assessment Measurements 1. Epifaunalsubstrate / available cover 2. Embeddedness 3. Velocity-depth combinations 4. Sediment deposition 5. Channel flow status 6. Channel alteration 7. Frequency of riffles 8. Bank stability 9. Bank vegetative protection 10. Riparian vegetative zone width

  15. Epifaunal Substrate/ Available Cover Optimal Poor

  16. Epifaunal SubstrateEpi= on top ofFauna= animalsSubstrate=material on the bottom

  17. Epifaunal SubstrateHard substrates such as: - cobble- large gravel, and Other submerged structures such as: - snags

  18. Bedrock Bottom (e.g. limestone)

  19. Available Cover for Fish (e.g. snags)

  20. Available Cover for Fish Undercut stream banks Snags and woody debris

  21. 1. EpifaunalSubstrate/ Available Cover • Optimal • 70% of substrate is favorable • There is a presence of woody debris, large gravel, cobble, and undercut banks. • Suboptimal • 40-70% mix of stable habitat • Presence of additional substrate in the form of new-fall may rate at high end of category. • Marginal • 20-40% mix of stable habitat • Poor • Less than 20% stable habitat • Lack of habitat is obvious; substrate is unstable or lacking.

  22. 2. Embeddedness Poor Optimal

  23. 2. Embeddedness • Optimal • Gravel, cobble, and boulders are 0-25% surrounded by fine sediment. • Suboptimal • Gravel, cobble, and boulders are 25-50% surrounded by fine sediment. • Marginal • Gravel, cobble, and boulders are 50-75% surrounded by fine sediment. • Poor • Gravel, cobble, and boulders are more than 75% surrounded by fine sediment.

  24. 3. Velocity-Depth Regime Poor Optimal

  25. Different Velocity/Depth Regimes = Different Stream Habitats

  26. Caddisfly in Case Hellgrammite Riffle Inhabitants Sculpin Madtom

  27. Pool Inhabitants Green Drake (Mayfly) Midge Larvae Creek Chub Longnose Sucker

  28. 3. Velocity-Depth Regime • Optimal • All 4 combinations present. • Note: If only 1 riffle, score lower in this category. • Suboptimal • Only 3 of the 4 combinations present. • Note: If fast-shallow is missing, score lower in this category. • Marginal • Only 2 of the 4 combinations present. • Note: If fast-shallow or slow-shallow are missing, score lower in this category. • Poor • Only 1 of the 4 combinations is present.

  29. 4. Sediment Deposition Poor Optimal

  30. 4. Sediment Deposition Point Bars Shoal

  31. Large Amount of Sediment Deposited Forming an Island

  32. 4. Sediment Deposition • Optimal • Little or no enlargement of islands or point bars • Less than 5% of bottom affected by sediment deposition • Suboptimal • Some new increase in bar formation, mostly from gravel, sand or fine sediment • 5-30% of the bottom affected • Slight deposition in pools • Marginal • Moderate deposition of new gravel, sand or fine sediment on old and new bars • 30-50% of the bottom affected • Sediment deposits at obstructions, constrictions & bends • Moderate deposition of pools prevalent • Poor • Heavy deposits of fine material, increased bar development • More than 50% of the bottom changing frequently • Pools almost absent due to substantial sediment deposition

  33. 5. Channel Flow Status?

  34. 5. Channel Flow Status?

  35. 5. Channel Flow Status? Optimal: Water from bank to bank.

  36. 5. Channel Flow Status?

  37. 5. Channel Flow Status? Poor:Very little water in channel and water mostly present as standing pools.

  38. 5. Channel Flow Status?

  39. 5. Channel Flow Status? Marginal: Water fills 25-75% of the available channel.

  40. #5: Channel Flow Status? 5. Channel Flow Status?

  41. #5: Channel Flow Status? 5. Channel Flow Status? Suboptimal:Water fills >75% of channel.

  42. 5. Channel Flow Status • Optimal • Water reaches base of both lower banks. • Minimal amount of channel substrate is exposed. • Suboptimal • Water fills >75% of the available channel; OR • <25% of channel substrate is exposed. • Marginal • Water fills 25-75%of the available channel; AND/OR • Riffle substrates are mostly exposed. • Poor • Very little water in channel • Water mostly present as standing pools.

  43. 6. Channel Alteration Optimal Poor

  44. A highly disturbed, channelized stream like this contains little habitat for fish and invertebrates due to no rocks or wood, uniform depth, and limited aquatic habitat diversity.

  45. Hardening Channel

  46. Stream Hardening Riprap Gabbions

  47. Stream Hardening

More Related