610 likes | 817 Vues
Community College League of California Annual Convention & Partner Conferences November 21, 2009. “Using Design Build”. SMCCCD’s Experience with Design Build: New Buildings. Science Building with Planetarium & Rooftop Observatory, College of San Mateo
E N D
Community College League of California Annual Convention & Partner ConferencesNovember 21, 2009 “Using Design Build”
SMCCCD’s Experience with Design Build: New Buildings • Science Building with Planetarium & Rooftop Observatory, College of San Mateo • Student & Community Center and Science Lab Annex, Skyline College • 44-unit Faculty & Staff Housing, CSM • 60-unit Faculty & Staff Housing, Cañada College • Health & Wellness Building, CSM • College Center, CSM • Cosmetology, Administration & Wellness Center, Skyline College • Automotive Transmission Lab Building Skyline College
SkylineCollege Cosmetology, Administration & Wellness Center
SkylineCollege Cosmetology, Administration & Wellness Center
District Wide Athletics Improvements Athletics Facilities Upgrades 31 tennis courts 3 baseball fields 3 soccer fields 1 softball field 2 tracks 1 football field 1 aquatic center Parking & ADA Improvements Ancillary facilities (restrooms, press box, storage)
SMCCCD’s Experience with Design Build: Infrastructure Energy Efficiency Projects 12kV Electrical Infrastructure System replacement (CSM and Skyline College) Chiller Plants (CSM and Cañada College)
Sustainability and Energy Efficiency Outcomes New energy management system at all campuses Comprehensive systems commissioningat all campuses Cañada College chiller plant expansion Heating / Hot water variable flow pumping retrofits at all campuses Electrical distribution system repairs Web-based real-time monitoring and metering platform at all campuses AHU refurbishments at all campuses Underground piping repairs at all campuses Lighting retrofits : Lighting controls and circuit upgrades at all campuses Boiler repairs and preventative maintenance at all campuses Co-generation plants: CSM (560 KW) & Skyline College (375 KW)
Sustainability and Energy Efficiency OutcomesWork Completed By the Numbers… 9,551 Light Fixtures Retrofitted 113 Air Handlers Refurbished 306 Heat/Vent Units Refurbished 4 Boilers Re-tubed 206 l.f. Underground Piping Replacement 58 valves 9 expansion compensators 2,892 EMS Control Points Connected & Functioning
Project Highlights • Energy Efficiency (LEED/Savings by Design) • Upcoming New Buildings • CSM Design Build (2 Buildings) • Workforce / Wellness / Aquatic Center (5N) – 88,374 GSF* • Student Services / Admin. / Student Activities (10N) – 104,149 GSF* • Overall Campus Landscape & Hardscape • New Chiller Plant* • 12 KV Electrical Infrastructure Replacement • Total Contract Amount: $142.5 Million • SKY Design Build (2 Buildings) • Cosmetology & Administration / Wellness Center (4N) – 70,310 GSF* • Automotive Technology Building (11N) – 8,800 GSF* • Overall Campus Landscape & Hardscape • 12 KV Electrical Infrastructure Replacement • Total Contract Amount: $60.4 Million Note: * Savings by Design
Savings Summary • Operational Savings: $1.5M annually (Plus) • PG&E Energy Efficiency: $1,008,157 • CCC/IOU Partnership: $168,792.34 • Savings by Design: $129,930
Why Design-Build Delivery Method? • Compressed Schedule: move-in sooner • Satisfying Relationship between Owner/Architect/Builder • Unforeseen Conditions in Renovations: • Flexibility & Quick Response • Better Price Certainty
The Design Build Road Map Selecting a Project for Design Build Delivery BOT Resolution CCCO Project Approval / Notification Process Bridging Public Notification Prequalification Request for Qualification (RFQ) Request for Proposal (RFP) Confidential Meetings (x3) Site Surveys RFP Interviews Selection Stipend Award Guidelines / Process
Pros Simplified contracting Reduction in adversarial relationships Cost containment Speed of delivery Sharing of risk Early involvement of the builder Validate another project delivery method for the CCDs Cons Significant investment of time and effort up front and during implementation Potentially less control over design May be more difficult to compare proposals Limited institutional capabilities Approval agency capabilities Pros and Cons
Design Build Points of Consideration • Single Responsibility • No finger pointing • Eliminates Legal Triangle • Cost Control • Fixed limit of Construction costs • Feedback for better Design and Construction documents • Better Technology • Learn from the people who make and install building systems • Designer participation in practical application • Flexibility to get the most current technology • Perfect Design Build Team • Knows Design • Knows the Builder • Project Specific • What one persons knows is available to all • Contractor isn’t plotting for claims and change orders • Communications, Documentation & Costs are transparent
DB Team Qualification and Selection Process • Design Build for Community Colleges: • Education Code §17250 • Structure the RFP to Attract D-B Teams • Qualification Shortlist to 3 DB teams plus 2 Alternates • Criteria Based Selection Process
DB Proposal Evaluation Criteria FACTORS Maximum Points 1. Price and Cost Management Plan* 20 2. Technical Expertise 10 3. Life Cycle Costs over 25 Years 10 4. Skilled Labor Force Availability 10 5. Acceptable Safety Record* 10 6. Design Management Plan 10 7. Construction Management Plan 10 8. Schedule 10 9. Legal and Other Program Requirements 5 10. Risk Management Plan 5 TOTAL (Maximum) 100 points
RFQ/RFP Documents • RFQ/RFP Documents available at the project website • http://www.smccd.edu/accounts/smccd/departments/facilities/CSM_B12151734Mod_01.shtml • Project Website • Source for all information from District
RFP Documents • Developing the RFP Documentation • Format and Organization of the RFP Package • SMCCCD standard form of DB contract • Existing floor plans • Schematic floor plans • Room data sheets • Program information • Standards and Design Criteria